Two Resurrections... Two Sabbaths... Two Salvations... Two Trumps...

Twain Allegory Comparisons on this R - T TwainShew page 6:

Two Resurrections | Two Reconcileds | Two Religions | Two Rests | Two Revelations |
| Two Sabbaths | Sacrifices | Salvations | Servants | Sins | Sons | Sorrows | Spirits | Two Swords |
| Two Testaments | Two Testators | Two Thems | Two Throughs  | Two Times | Two Trees | Two Trumps

Two Resurrections, both from graves, in "verily verily" John 5:29?

Rather than leave feudal folly and blame game shame to go on to us-ward: we all are one,
they vs they would have a sides war from graves via two resurrections for them vs them?
What can we say about such Broad vs Narrow mindead twain, except it's double minded.

Two resurrections, of two opposing ways, is a graves subject; Not a grace us subject
like God is one above twain (not twain, nor one of twain) has no two ways about it.

John 5:29
all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth;
they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and
they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
 

Mention of a "first resurrection" in Revelation 20 denotes a last resurrection to find and contrast; As mention of a "last trump" denotes a first trump to find and compare; Just as a "second death" denotes a first death to find and contrast, in a two (good/better) testament twain shew, which true God cannot lie nor die is notably "excepted" (exempt) from. That God is neither double minded nor highminded: neither twain nor one of twain when it comes to Two Sons Jesus' goats/sheep division is not peace and his five reversed Matthew 12: 30-37 either or divisions are also not peace; Because God is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: Mark 12:27; Luke 20:38. Immortal God is one above twain, not twain nor even one of twain. Incorruptible God, above tempting (lawing) and being tempted (lawed), neither makes sides, nor takes a side. So neither of two resurrections from the dead are of eternal God. He will not even hear of two deaths, let alone have one of twain.


So in a new and better testament of old/new and good/better testaments it is even further purposed, above and beyond highmindeadness of twain, to shew [who is] the blessed and only Potentate by Jesus Christ in his plural "times" as the third of three things:
 (i)   son of David: had two sons: Solomon and Nathan; But a greater than Solomon is here. Yet
        greater of great/greater can also be greater damnation via the resurrection of damnation.
 (ii)  son of Abraham: had two sons: Ishmael and Isaac; But we are not children, but free.
 (iii) Son of God in heaven (higher than heavens) has one Son: Christ; But of this/that it's that Christ.

For eternal life of eternal salvation is "through Jesus-->Christ", which ends with "Christ"; But of false/true Christs arise, this/that, only "that Christ" is the Son of the God of the living is not the God of the dead: Mark 12:27; Luke 20:38... if you follow my clarifying allegory clues about the triple allegoric mystery (i) of God and (ii) of the Father and (iii) of Christ ... has lots of twists to it requiring "give more earnest heed" to escape (of "not escape" or "escape") wrath to come. Escape is not by plural rapture theories, nor by plural resurrections, but by endure unto the end (of law) already written to be eternally saved and awared by JC grace and truth; Notably the end written in every Pauline Epistle, and notably by his own (singular) hand, including Hebrews and Revelation.

So, there's twain of everything to sort out, and "also" the aspect of when "spiritual" of natural/spiritual there's still the "comparing spiritual things (law law) with spiritual (grace)" to do. For in the "new" of old/new testaments there's still a new and dead way (called "their end") to have instead of a new and living way of charity never faileth, grace never forsaketh, called merciful perfection to go on unto by leaving the principles, even those of the narrow way of broad/narrow (twain) ways which only "leadeth unto" life, which can be life of life + death (doesn't end with life) by a draw back to perdition prior to "the end" having life only is no dead end of two resurrections, both from the graves, which is a graves subject, not a grace us subject.

But law is both good and evil. Grace is good only. So we're talking law law: two resurrections for two sorts of them. And when considered as first & last resurrections, last would be the resurrection of "damnation" is defined as resurrecting law: the ministration of "condemnation" and accusation which God did "not" send his Son to do (John 3:17) nor would he do (John 5:45); Not even to the woman (church) caught in adult-ery and brought unto him to judge (John 8:3-11) as guiltless by grace; Since law judgment is "inexcusable", which leaves them all law judging "without excuse".

Both of two resurrections in John 5:29 are of "they" and "they" having their "end" shall be according to "their works": 2Corinthians 11:15, as two resurrections "of the dead", not one raising up "from the dead x2". Two Resurrections of dead, from graves, to left and right places on "high" in law law "heavens", is as if the child of hell (who gets greater damnation: desolation) sits left in Moses' seat and more the child of hell is right standing in another law of Two Sons Jesus' two laws; Whereby the second (come forth) is like the first in Matthew 22:36-40, and the first (come forth) is sin and death in Romans 8:2. For when Stephen saw Jesus right standing in law vs law, it did NOT go well for him. He was cast out and stoned to death. Even right standing in grace of law/grace doth "stand in jeopardy every hour" of being lawed (killed) again. So then, neither of two resurrections is a Christ ascension "far above the heavens" to God in heaven: higher than the heavens. Matthew 23 hypocrites, fools, vipers, blind guides, serpents, and whited sepulchres seated left on high have enemies they want killed, and "worse" standing right on high still have enemies they wanna kill, is not only child-ish in both cases, but called "spiritual wickedness" in high [places]: Ephesians 6:12. In contrast to both, in "Christ" is "the end of the law", it's one higher ascension for us all, unto "far above the heavens": to higher God is merciful: harmless: upbraideth not: does not impute trespasses. For of a truth, "there is no respect of persons with God" and that Christ false/true Christs arise is the Saviour of the world x2, even by verily verily John 4:42 and 1John 4:14.
 
The "first resurrection" mentioned twice in Revelation 20:5,6 is notably labeled "this" (of this/that), and a first resurrection where the rest of the dead "lived not": Is NOT an all live happily ever after scenario. Rather the before of before/after, the ye (do err) of ye/you, the oops of many get deceived (carried away) with rapture theories instead of endure unto the end to be saved (only) by grace (only) and awared by truth (only), rather than both saved + destroyed after by grace + law is as life + death (does NOT end with life). He that hath "part" in the first resurrection is said to be "blessed and holy"; But perhaps with the first of twain blesseds: notably a cover up, and via the first of twain Holys: notably the Ghost; Perhaps the death Comforter of two Comforters mentioned in John 14 & 15, an perhaps the 2nd of such lie/truth is the "Spirit of truth". Not to mention "they" noted therein who shall be (plural) "priests" of God and of Christ (of CJ is not JC) reign only 1,000 years [is] as 1 day: 2Peter 3:8 are the "many" deceived, and perhaps the many "priests" noted in Hebrews 7:23 who are "not suffered to continue (the human race) by reason of death". Selah.

Which is as if saying every good allegoric "mystery" has lots of twists, especially near the end. And when it comes to both "allegory" & "mystery": the allegoric mystery thereof can get very tricky, to the point of deceiving even the elect if possible. But the incorruptible cannot be corrupted. So we're exhorted to put off a corruptible crown "they" desire to put on a incorruptible crown. For "they" are them who'd have two resurrections; Whereas "we" would have only one resurrection of both the just and unjust, of all unto life only, not unto life + death(does NOT end with life). Nor would we have the resurrection of damnation(condemnation, accusation) to a high place, is actually a low place, below united heaven is higher than (divided) heavens on high, are both hellish. For it's both a "fall"(from grace) and a "fearful" thing, to "fall into the (plural)hands of God" on high in heavens. So Galatians, written "unto the churches" which are "foolish", thereby "bewitched", says in Gal 5:4 to such like: "Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace". And such admonition preceded by: it's evident from evidence that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God.

Many, deceived by many, comfort one another with a first of two comforts in 1Thess 4 & 5, via the first of two Comforters in John 14 & 15. In the case of two trumps, the dead in Christ rise first, but such speaks of the Christ of "Christ Jesus" (reverse of Jesus Christ), not of peace with God is through Jesus Christ; Not to mention "there is no respect of persons with God" and in "that Christ" of through Jesus --> Christ: the aboltion of law is also the aboltion of sacrifice, there are no dead. Perhaps in the manner there are no lost (dead) in all found (alive), in Luke 15's lost and found x3. For in him is no sin, which speaks of no law (when no law, no sin imputed: Romans 5:13), which speaks of no death, as law is both source and the strength of sin, which brings forth death (1Corinthians 15:56; James 1:15). Which is to say perhaps the life many are offered in the second law of Romans 8:2 law vs law (loser vs loser) is both life + death, via both truth (grace) + lie (law). Our goal is be raised up to God can't lie nor die; via be ye reconciled (through J --> C) --> to God. Such is via increased awareness, not via either or of two resurrections from graves. For God is one, not twain, nor either one of twain wanting to continue their feudal folly sides war from "graves".

To wit, that God was in that Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them (where no law, there no transgression: Romans 4:15): 2Corinthians 5:19. Like God, being his "express image" (not mirror image), Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to day, and for ever (Hebrews 13). He came, with grace and truth (not law and lies), to do the will of God, which is the same in both Old and New Testaments: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice". And of false/true spirits, truth is "that Jesus Christ is come", and paid a visit, not a ransom. Pure religion paid a visit to they and they afflicted with a bad case of grace + law = life + death = vain religion.

As for being raised up the third day is as the last day, it's an awakening to righteousness: grace from a sleep of death: law law night visions of Daniel going forth as night mares in Revelation; As if by re-membering of whom you are what you are thereby, via a reNEWing of the mind (from doublemindead to Christ minded), a conversion from both them vs them to one: just us; Beginning as a grace walk from Mt Sinai to Mt Sion. But since Mt Sinai is in Arabia, and since Mt Sion also has a stumblingstone to stumble on, it then becomes lay aside the weight which easily besets runners of the human race like the churches of Galatia got hindered to the point of bewitched, in order to do the end "run" to from corruptible to incorruptible, a grace run along "with patience" unto the end written having no death, especially when it is seen "we also are compassed about" (surrounded) with so great a cloud of law law witnesses. Being raised up, not resurrected, is also a chanGe of Glory: from (law) glory to (grace) glory, and a change of faith: from (blind) faith to (seeing) faith: as if going on to both saved & aware what we're saved (delivered) from: "We are delivered from the law", and in response to our prayer: deliver us from evil (concupiscence). For until we let go of law, let it be dead testator of NT, we'll "stand in jeopardy every hour".

Then [cometh] the end (of law)...1Corinthians 15 ... as if the best of good better best comes last, but not as first and last = oxymoron. The best is yet to come when better of good/better twain. When the God shew is truly ended, then "it is finished" brings forth death (not life) never happened, kinda like the real magic is at the end of the 1998 Merlin movie: when they stop acknowledging evil (law), then such childish law law vanishes along with all the dead works thereof.

Law waxeth so old in the New Testament it's so faulty and fault finding it's both "ready to vanish" (Hebrews 8:13) and "shall vanish" (1Corinthians 13:8). Only then is there oneness, one raising up from the dead, from the dead works of law law folk who believe life + death ends with life. Obviously "they" are miss-taken, taken in a fault, for life + death does not end with life. Not to mention the over-all objective is not to believe all this and that, rather to "know" the difference between all this and that portrayed in a God shew, for compare-i-son, even for comparing Gods. For the God of the living is not the God of the dead; Which is to say Grace is not of Law, Mercy is not of Sacrifice, and Peace is not of Confusion. Two resurrections is not of God is one. It's twainy.

Reconciled x2: Romans 5:10 vs Reconciled: 2Cor5

The second reconciled is notably "much more", in the same manner as where sin abounded, grace did "much more" abound; indicating there is an even higher calling than just getting it right of left/right sides of a war. For an even higher calling than being servants of righteousness instead of servants of sin, is notably being no more a servant at all. A higher calling than being children of God instead of children of the wicked, is be no more children at all. A higher calling than playing your part of their part vs your part is having no part-iality at all. So let us be not reconciled to the better of two deaths, but to eternal life void of death; Which is to say let us not be reconciled to the better of two laws if law vs law is as loser vs loser, nor even to grace of law/grace if it's loser vs winner, but to grace void of law has no losers at all, only winners all.

Much more abounding grace (than grace of law/grace) does not law impute sin to forgive, nor make or take sides to have war; In the same manner as "charity" (perfect love: void of fear; pure grace: void of law) is the "more excellent way" and the "greatest" of "three things", that "never faileth" because it does not law impute sin to forgive: "charity thinketh no evil" to forgive. For love not perfected often fails, even the agape sort of filio/agape loves tends to fail. But "charity never faileth", by being "above" things like "forgiving one another": Colossians 3. For when no law, sin is not imputed: Romans 5:13; When sin is not imputed, nothing to forgive.

Let's consider that it took stoop x2 and arise x2 to clear the room of accusers in John 8:3-11. Two reconcileds reflect the need to be twice risen or twice reconciled if twice fallen; Or the need for two uprisings if Babylon the great is twice fallen: "is fallen, is fallen". It reasons if Babylon the "great" is twice fallen to "great"<--greater<--greatest, that the ultimate reconciliation of such twice fallen Babylon, or what is commonly called 'universal reconciliation', global reconciliation unto God our Father in "heaven": higher than the heavens, requires two uprisings: first from great to greater, then (great-->greater)-->greatest. We could also perceive such as first being reconciled to the better of twain good/better, then further reconciled to what's best of (good-->better)-->best by leaving "principles" as noted in Heb 6.

Two Religions vs Religion

Impure Religion x2 vs Pure Religion

The mention of "pure religion" in James 1:27 allegorically denotes there is also impure religion to find and compare. James 1:26 calls the impure religions (laws) vain. Jesus noted the Sadducees and Pharisees were both called vipers. Solomon also notes, about law, that such is "all vanity and vexation of spirit" x7: Ecclesiates. A study of the epistles of Paul The Apostle reveals impure religion is grace + law, the law thereof being faulty, impure, imperfect, even a lie from the beginning. Since grace "is" and law "added", the only mixture plausible is grace + law, and since law vs grace are contrary things, both makes a perverted and polluted mixture commonly called an oxy-moron: one proselyte: more the child of hell, one thing with a bad ending such as life + death = a dead end. Hence it is said law, both the source of sin and the strength of sin, and the sting thereof law imputed sin is death, by law. Hence many who go with another law, of the law law in Matthew 22:36-40, have gone with another kind of vain religion. So there seems to be two sorts of vain (impure) religion: by either law of law vs law, but only one kind of pure religion, via grace of laws vs grace. Yet Noahic grace + law is not the same as JC grace + truth, so in the end it's clarified what sort of grace is with you all, against none.

Learn more about two religions: impure/pure noting pure religion paid a "visit", not a ransom.

Two Rests: Death vs Cease Divisions

The rest(peace) offered by Holy Ghost Law is supposed rest in peace of death; And many who believed law have entered such death, but perhaps not true peace(rest), as noted by the story in Luke 16:20-31 where the rich man died and afterward had torment, not rest(peace). This man may have ceased from his works in death, but his law works followed him into death, to torment him. So it is written in Hebrews 4 if Jesus had given them rest would he not afterward have spoken of another day; Perhaps  the third [day] in which he shall be perfected.

Folks, it's been the third day is also the seventh day for seven years already, beyond 2000AD. So let us put away law that we may also be perfected rather than fooled by law into death followed by potential torment that seems to last forever.

The other sort of rest is to cease from divisional works, as God did from his works, to have seventh day rest of grace void law. Such speaks of ceasing from all law vs law, and even from law vs grace divisions, since even law vs grace is division and not peace, which gives place to law. Above such divisions there is only grace, mercy, peace; Only unity and no divisions at all. Such is the only eternal rest for all in the end written, but it can also be entered into while living.

Hebrews 4 notes there remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God, by ceasing from all religious and political divisions, works that promote unrest instead of rest, as God did cease from his works. It then specifically notes we should labor to enter into "that rest", in the same manner the Bible also speaks of "that God" and "that Spirit" and "that Light", to distinguish it.

Two Revelations (Uncoverings) For Comparison

In what many commonly call Revelation or the Book of Revelation, and what some mistakenly call The Revelation of Jesus Christ, the actual title is: The Revelation of St John The Divine; And the first verse reveals a second revelation for comparison: The Revelation of Jesus Christ. Only one of Two Revelations is God given; And for a stated purpose: to "shew" things to servants(slaves), who haven't learned what's best of three things is thou art no more a servant. For even being the better sort of two servants is only better for some, not what's best for all.

                  Two Revelations (Uncoverings): For Compare-i-son
                1. The Revelation (Uncovering) of St John The Divine: title
                2. The Revelation (Uncovering) of Jesus Christ: first verse

    1. John turned back to what was "behind" him: Law ("worketh wrath" = "destruction").
    2. Jesus->Christ went on to be the Christ: "the end of the law", "Saviour of the world".

For more details on "which (plural)things are an allegory" (Galatians 4), see Revelations. For since Revelation, by definition, means to uncover, disclose, reveal, discover; We have not one, but twain uncoverings (two revelations): the uncovering(revelations) of a saint named John thought to be the divine, and for comparison the uncovering(revelation) of Jesus Christ, which is found primarily in the Pauline Epistles. It's a full monty of both John and Jesus Christ (allegorically Law & Grace compared as Lie & Truth) to see which is witch; Which one of two revelations (two uncoverings) has what it takes to be winner take all in such a shewdown. Many think closure is the answer, but revelation is about disclosure, uncovering, revealing what's been closed (classified), covered up, hidden; And when proper fully monty revelation comes to a theatre near you, there's nothing hidden that is not also revealed: Luke 8:17; 12:2. Of twain: Law or Grace, Christ is our peace who made of twain one new man that's Grace us.

Two Sabbaths of Easter Week vs Eternal Sabbath

And it came to pass on the second Sabbath after the first, that he (Jesus) went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands.

The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and [that] they might be taken away.

Unknown to many Christians, who usually think of Sunday (first of the week) as the Sabbath, is there are at least two Sabbaths during Passover-Easter Passion Week: An annual Sabbath (Passover) in the midst called an "high day" ("that Sabbath" John 19:31), and a weekly Sabbath (seventh day) before Easter Sunday considered to be a higher Sabbath. Yet what few seem to even know is: in the New Testament we find, concerning teo high things which are both highminded, Pauline exhortations to "mind not high things" and to "be not highminded" x2, since highminded is notably listed among "unholy" things to "turn away" from in 2Timothy 3. High things would include a Hebrew GOD (Majesty) on high who notably both spake/spoke in time past/last days to them/us via prophets/Son: Hebrews 1; As well as old/new high priests thereof such an awful lawful God on high. What even fewer of the so-called elect few seem to know is: Sion is not Zion in the Old Testament KJV, where it's also mentioned Sion (Hermon) is higher than Zion (City of David); But Zion is not even mentioned in New Testament KJV, where it's mentioned a stumble stone is laid in (higher) Sion for you-->all to watch (Mk 13:37) out for, lest you (of ye/you), all the kingdom of God located "within you", stumble on such a stumble stone (rock of offense) and have a humpty dumpty fall noted in Galatians 5:4. For then Christ(is the end of the law) is of "no effect" to you (of ye/you). An example of "no effect" would be "not escape" in 1Thessalonians 5:3, notably happens to them of them/us in 5:3/5:9.

So even after exhortation to leave the (plural) principles in order to go on in Hebrews 6, we also find exhortation to pick up the pace of the race from walk to run, in Hebrews 12: notes doing the end "run" along "with patience" (does the end run at a "much more" pace than walk), requires a "weight" loss, since such dead weight many priests carry obviously besets them from continuing the race: "not suffered to continue by reason of death": Hebrews 7:23. For obviously "endure unto the end", to be "saved" only (Matthew 24:13; Mark 13:13) instead of being both saved + destroyed after as all them Exodus folk (Jude 1:5), requires continue the race, and notably at a faster pace than a walk through the valley of the shadow of death. For Enoch, the seventh, notably "walked" with God, and was later "not found" = "lost" = "dead" in Luke 15's lost(dead) and found(alive) scenario. David also walked, in Psalms 23; But David is not even ascended into the heavens: Acts 2:34, let alone seated with Christ above such L/R heavens. So let's pick up the pace of the race, from walk to run, when seeing we also are compassed about (surrounded) by a great (law) cloud (confusion) of (false) witnesses, be they many or few. Let us compare Two Sabbaths of Easter Week vs the Eternal Sabbath of God.

So then, let's consider three: High Higher Highest Sabbaths; With Highest being neither High nor Higher, in the same manner All (no partiality) is neither Many nor Few, Us-ward (accounted as salvation) is neither of Them vs Them, Christ (is the end of the law) is neither Adam1 nor Adam2 (since "as in Adam all die"), Grace (neither tempts nor can be tempted) is neither Law1 nor Law2, and an Eternal Sabbath (having neither even-ing nor mourn-ing) is neither an Annual Sabbath nor a Weekly Sabbath. For what even fewer than either many or few seem to know is "the seventh day" in Genesis 2 has no mention of evening and morning (pun: even-ing and mourn-ing), as six other days all being good x6 in Genesis 1 notably do. For although what God saw in Genesis 1 was (only) "good" x6, not both good and evil, what God saw the 7th time, even  in Genesis 1, was notably "very good".

In the same manner the seventh Bible: Holy Bible (KJV) was notably made from six good, by Tanslators of the Bible, learned men all; But not as one better nor purpose driven (like many purpose 'driven' sheeple of many purpose 'driven' churches); Yet the seventh Bible did have a notable purpose: to make God's holy truth the more known to the world God so loved, perfectly: also merciful (not also merciless).

Revelation(Uncovering), which begins as Revelations, takes place on the weekly sabbath. Such is evident from seven benedictions ("blessed is ...") therein. Customarily 18 benedictions were spoken daily at the temple, by priest within and people without, but only seven on the weekly Sabbath (seventh day). Seven benedictions in Revelation reasons it takes place on the weekly Sabbath; Yet perhaps Revelation also begins as a Sabbaths (last day) shewdown. For there's two Sabbaths (annual and weekly), perhaps three, to compare in the Holy Bible; Even two Sabbaths the week of the crucifixion ('high' day of Passover and 'higher' seventh day ending week). Yet perhaps of three things high higher highest; the firstly pure sort of wisdom is the highest of three things: high higher highest. So, let us consider there may be two higher Sabbaths; one being as a black Sabbath (which Son of man is "Lord also" of, such a Sabbath made for men) requiring us to go on from a higher Sabbath unto the (Eternal) Sabbath.

So, considering high Sabbath (Passover), there seem to be two: one for Sadducees and one for Pharisees, both notably called vipers. Considering higher Sabbath, there also seems to be two: a black Sabbath called "the day of the LORD is darkness and not light", and a day of God compared in 2Peter3; But which God of two Gods of Passover-Easter Week? So, we find ever more clarity as the God shew continues beyond the two last days of 2Peter 3. For the "last day" (which is non millennial) is neither of two "last days" (which are millennial); And we've already now gone beyond peril us times of both millennial last days, by going beyond 2000AD to the third day of AD-->only goes one way, is as the seventh day is the last day. But which last day, if there be a last day shewdown still going on, beyond the last days, where even global weather is pendulum swinging to<-->fro to get our attention. Selah.

One Sabbath is eternal, called "the day (light) of God" converted Peter exhorts is the day we all ought to be looking for and hastening unto. The other sort, "the day of the LORD", is oft presumed millennial (from misunderstanding Revelation 20's mention of 1,000 yrs), but is not millennial: see Day of the Lord vs Day of God. And since "the first of the week" (Sun day) can also be translated as the 'First of Sabbaths' in Greek; And not to mention Sabbath is sometimes plural, sometimes singular in Greek (such as Mt 28:1 & Mk 16:1), well then "the Sabbath" of Sabbaths is perhaps not the better of twain, but what's best of good better best things; Kinda like one of twain servants seems better sort of two sons, but Galatians 4:7 notes being a son (Christ) is neither of two Sons (Jesus). In the same manner be no more children is neither of two sorts of children. Yet even though being born again invovles man of child/man, clarity says God is not a man. So it's be ye reconciled (through Jesus-->Christ)-->to God: 2Corinthians 5. For God is not a man that he should lie(law), neither Son of man that he should repent(change): Numbers 23:19. So although reconciling the world to God is done "in Christ" (not in two Sons Jesus did not give them rest), reconciled is neither to Jesus nor to Christ, but rather to God. For reconciled to God requires neither mediation nor intercession. But which reconciled, if there be two in Romans 5:10, and it's take away the first to establish the second?

The eternal sabbath (seventh day), described in Gen 2 , as well as other places ("that day"), has no mention of evening and morning (as six days in Gen 1). Such a day (light, understanding) of God, speaks of God rested (at peace), but not before God ended blessed and sanctified; to ensure God at rest, is one, who made a decision, to be, the God of all grace: the living God of the living ...for that God knows you can't get any real rest, true peace, with any in-laws around, so there first has to be an end to them and their plural heavens, sides war thereof, along with a better blessed (which is not a law benediction) : Ps 32: 1,2 / Rom 4: 7,8 for man kind of such child/man kinds; even a sanctifying of the will of God (to perfect it), from I will have mercy, and not sacrifice; to "grace with you all" (no sacrifice, not even mention of it in end).

The non eternal & non millennial sabbath (seventh day, day of the LORD) described in Revelation, as well as other places in the Scriptures,  is oft spoken of as a day of "wrath" ... evidently a day of "law", since "law worketh wrath" (Rom 4:15). But God hath "not" appointed us unto wrath (1Thes 5:9) ; so day of the LORD isn't the day of God in 2Pet 3's comparison of two sabbaths. Rather the non eternal sabbath is simply imagined, via mixing two laws (Rom 8:2), thereby becoming law law; and in Revelation 13 it gets even law<--law as first<--second takes place, creating a second up rising of "law worketh wrath" in diverse places, like S.E. 'Asia' perhaps.

Hence what's allegorically portrayed in Revelation of John (Uncovering of John) as a worse case scenario to a void is only a 'phantom' menace, a "shadow" (dark version, lie) of good things to come, not the very (true) image. And once we (God will raise us up on the third day) get many (deceived by many) to realize it, they may recover themselves (2Tim 2) from such imagination (contrary to knowledge of God: "grace is sufficient"), and it'll be a flame out: poof goes the dragon, when televangelastic deceivers (Mt 24:4,5; Lk 21:8) such like Jack of the Impe family (JVI Presents) who say they want to 'vanish' (rapture), vansih, like the dead sea is now rapidly doing the vanishing act. Let them vanish: click (by using your remote)! Such hastens us all to the day(light) of God wherein there's no misunderstanding, nor wrath from merciful(perfect) God.

Two Sacrifices: Good/Better: God will not have

The biblical mention of "better sacrifices" in Hebrews 9 implies two sorts of sacrifices are being compared, and of the (good/better) twain, one of twain is the "better" sort. For example a "living sacrifice" mentioned in Romans 12 would be better than a dead sacrifice. Yet even that mention is followed by mention of the "perfect" will of God. So when it comes to what's best of good better best, to God and Son "of God", especially in context with his will and perfection, then it's "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" (Hos 6; Mt 9) and "thy will be done", not only in heaven, but also on earth. Hebrews 10 mentions Lo, I come to do thy will O God, and in context with "he taketh away the first that he may establish the second", and it also clarifies that God was 'never' pleased with sacrifice (Eg: Ps 40:7), which is "of the law". A living sacrifice may seem a better sacrifice, but when it's allegorically revealed as being a living sacrifice(law), then it(law) soon becomes a latter end worse instead of some thing better, via the two beast scenario of Revelation 13's LAW<--Law. So a living sacrifice(law) gives place and power to vengeful LAW, to vengeance is mine, I will repay, saith the LAW(LORD), which things are an allegory.

So we see, of (Mosaic/JC) law/grace compared as lie/truth (Jn 1:17), grace(truth) does not compromise with law(lie); Rather abolishes the law (Eph 2) to the point of "blotting out" (Col 2) such enmity, even everything written in stone and in ink: 2Cor 3 is to be "done away", because law worketh wrath, destructive wrath (1Thes 5:3), the no escape sort, which God hath "not" appointed us unto: 1Thes 5:9. And of sacrifice/mercy, of such (lie/truth) law/grace, mercy does not compromise with sacrifice either; Rather casts it out in the same manner that love(God), of fear(LORD)/love(God), of such begin/end of fear... love does not compromise with fear either; Rather casts out all fear to be "perfect", because fear hath torment.

So of two sorts of sacrifice, even though one of twain is the better sort, both are as martyr-DUMB in the Bible when it comes to what's greatest of great greater greatest. And in it's in the same manner as law law of Rom 8 (midst of Romans) perceives one law as the better sort of twain, but in the end of Romans there is notably no mention of any law, as in all the conclusions of all the Pauline epistles, including Hebrews and Revelation. Selah.

To understand such a radical concept better, perhaps take a look at the two sorts of servants, and then at be no servant, rather a son in Gal 4:7; Also look at the two sorts of children, then at be no more children in Eph 4, rather be man kind, the perfect ("merciful") sort that Christ (the end of the law) is. Yet also remember when it comes to man/God, God is not a man that he should lie. Ever more clarity via ever more light... until it's all light and no darkness at all.

Two Salvations: Temporal & Eternal Salvation

Biblical mention of "eternal salvation" in Hebrews 5 obviously implies another sort of temporal salvation for comparison & contrast: Temporal Salvation: Saved + Destroyed afterward and Eternal Salvation: Saved(only) by Grace(only) the non eternal  Mosaic sort, the Noahic sort, the temporal sort: salvation + destruction (after) witch was evidently a dead end for all those saved in the flood story because Noah was dblemindead, and also for all those saved out of Egypt because Moses was dblemindead.

        Temporal Salvation: Saved(Graced) + Destroyed(Lawed) = Life + Death.
        Eternal Salvation: Saved(Graced) only, and thereby Life only as "the end".

Saved(Graced) + Destroyed(Lawed) afterward in Jude 5 obviously ends badly, as badly as good + evil, as blessed + cursed, as love + fear, and as grace + law being life + death = dead end. Hence our Lord JC is not the author of such dead end law law, but rather the author of "eternal salvation" (Heb 5:9): being made (Gen 1:26) perfect (merciful: Mt 5:48 / Lk 6:36) , by abolishing "the law"(singular) of "commandments"(plural) in Genesis 2:16 vs 17, abolishing Genesis 2:17's surely die law from his flesh (Eph 2:15), he (Christ: the end of the law) thereby became the "author of eternal salvation".


Eternal Salvation, what we ought to account as "salvation" according to converted Peter, is the long-suffering of the Lord to us-ward, just us thereof, and so none perish. All other salvation is temporal, such grace + law a sacrificial dead end, what God will not have, nor does the Bible. All who think other wise, of two wisdoms, can bend over and kiss their divided ass bye bye; for no amount of lying, crying, or dying will ever change the "immutable" will of God.

Two Servants: But we're exhorted be no servant

There are two servants compared in Romans 6: 17,18: the "servants" of sin and the "servants" of righteousness, with clarity the first sort is unto iniquity, the second is unto holiness. In Romans 6:19 the "unto" in each case being as if draw back to perdition or go on to perfection, unto iniquity(law) or holiness(grace). And as noted in Romans 6:20, when ye were servants of law imputing sin, then ye were free of obedience to righteousness (grace), and when servants of righteousness (grace) then free of obedience to law imputing sin and death thereof. However there's a twist many miss: a "servant" of righteousness is NOT "free", but bound.

Notably the end of the first sort, servants of law (sin and death thereof), is as if being servants of death, faithful to law unto death, have a dead end thereof. The end of the second sort can also go either way: a dead end or a living end; the living end being by go on, to being no servant at all, but rather "a" son, which speaks of true freedom (liberty) of true Son of God (Christ) higher than the Son of God (Jesus) on high, by know-ing is above and beyond faith-ing and hope-ing; As "charity never faileth" is the "greatest" of three things (great->greater)->greatest, the "greatest" being neither great nor greater law law, but "grace" which is neither of two "law"s in Mt 22: 36-40; As charity is neither of the two "love"s therein; Which is to allegory say "more excellent" is neither broadmindead nor narrowmindead.

3. Thou art no more servant, but a son; true Son of true God being "higher" than "on high"
2. Servants: of righteousness (servants of righteousness of another law are still bound by law)
1. Servants: of sin (servants of law: sin and death, are faithful to law unto death: a dead end)

So of this/that sorts of servants, that sort is "some better thing" of good/better things God hath provided for two sorts of them, or two sorts of children, who like "servants" have to be told what to do-eteronomy & don't-eronomy. Yet when considering three things, instead of just comparing two, such as good better best instead of twain this/that, thereby perhaps puffed up unto "another law" of twainy law/law instead of unto grace of law/grace; We find "exhortation" of edified->exhorted->unto comfort (void of dis-comfort) is as if being up lifted from above (exhorted) rather than just built up from below (edified); Being exhorted not to be any servant at all, in the same manner it's Pauline exhorted be no more children. Why? Even children of God on high (God our Destroyer: Law: Enmity: Ministration of death) do childish (devilish) things, like add "law worketh wrath" to "grace is sufficient". A child, even though he be heir of all things, differeth nothing from a servant, as long as he is a child (of child/man). Hence we are not to be a servant, but a son: Gal 4:7; Nor be children, but "man" kind: 1Cor 13:11. For God said "let us make man" (not child). Being made free, made perfect, is no servant at all. Selah.

Two Sins of 1John 5: 16,17

Sin: Unto Death and Sin: Not Unto death ?

First let's define what "sin" is. "Whatsoever is not of faith is sin": Rom 14:23..."the law is not of faith": Gal 3:12. So by connecting biblical dots the law is "sin"; And the law(sin thereof) is "evil": Our Father..."deliver us from evil"(Mt 6:13)..."we are delivered from the law"(Rom 7:6).

Yet do please note such deliverance(salvation) from the law(sin, evil) is  also the "us" part of them/us and the "we" part of they/we: which is (you)r part of ye/you, man part of child/man, new part of old/new, incorruptible part of corruptible/incorruptible crowns they/we seek, spirit-u-all part of soul/spirit, immortal part of mortal/immortal, eternal part of temporal/eternal salvations, be ye "perfect" of imperfect/perfect, "also merciful" of merciless/merciful parts. So in comparing sin(unto death) & sin(not unto death) it's as if we're talking about the nature-u-all part of natural first/spiritual afterward: as if talking law(sin) law(sin) unto carnal childish folk, "them": "forgive them" who "know not" what "they" (of they/we) do and say, "them" (of them/us) who know not what "they say" (Peace & Safety in Law Law) is the cause of sudden ("law worketh wrath") "destruction" of the "no escape" sort coming upon "them": 1Thess 5:3, upon "them all": Lk 17, all them vs them (scape-goats vs dumb-sheep) who know not the second(law: sin) is like the first(law:sin) in Mt 22:36-40's law law, and thereby in Rom 8:2's law law since the first(law) is "sin and death", the 2nd sin(law) is also sin "and" death, as deadly as the first law(sin) iff death thereof is not death unto the law to become alive unto God rather than death by the law. For sin(law), when "it is finished", brings forth death: James 1:15. The wages of sin(law) is death: Romans 6:23. Law(sin) is both the ministration of condemnation and the ministration of death: 2Corinthians 3:7,9. Yet note "adult"-ery is about adults; and it's only the "man" part of child/man that's "not justified by the law" in the sight of God: Galatians 3. Law of law/grace is the childish part of child/man, servant part of slave/free. A child differeth nothing from a servant as long as he remaineth a child: Gal 4:1. But when Paul became a man, he notably put away childish things, such as law(sin) law(sin).

So in saying there is a sin unto death & a sin not unto death, in which things(2 sons of Abraham by 2 mothers are 2 covenants) are an allegory, it's "as" if allegorically saying there is a law unto death & a law not unto death. And in saying "law", which is "sin", it's on the lower(natural) compare-i-son level of them vs them, law vs law, sin vs sin, children vs children, servants vs servants. Whereas "above a servant" is what's truly free of law(sin). Above such law law compare-i-son of Son of man vs Son of God on high in plural divided heavens is the higher exhortation from heaven above to mark & avoid them which cause division: Rom 16:17, "come out from among them": 2Cor 6:17, "mind not high things": Rom 12:16, "be not high-minded": Rom 11:20 & 1Tim 6:17 since "high-minded" is among "unholy" things: 2Tim 3, so "be no more children", to be "no more a servant(slave)" to law(sin thereof, death rider thereof, with hell to pay following such a rider obviously rode in on a horse allegorically called law). So be ye as perfect: Mt 5:48 (also merciful: Lk 6:36) as your Father in "heaven" ("higher than the heavens") is, and as perfect as the perfect man Christ(the end of the law) is, who notably "ascended far above the (law law) heavens" to appear to "God in heaven" for "us".

It's allegoric "mystery" with the over-all more-all "grace is sufficient"(no law req'd). So "go(depart) ye(do err) and learn"(from scriptures "written aforetime for our learning"); "learn what meaneth I will have mercy, and not sacrifice"... "go(learn) and sin(law) no more": Jn 8:11. For by such law law, you're damned if you do it & damned if you don't do it all, all of the time.

"All unrighteousness is sin": 1John 5:17. So all law is sin; For "where no law", there no transgression: Romans 4:15 and "when no law", then no sin imputed: Romans 5:13. So law is the root source of "sin(law) is the transgression of the law"; For "whosoever commiteth sin transgresseth also the law": 1Jn 3:4. Where & when no law(sin)? In Christ: "the end of the law": Romans 10:4. Also in "the end" we're told to endure unto, to be saved(only) by grace(only), since those who added law to grace is sufficient, after being saved(delivered) from the law, got both saved and destroyed after (by such grace + law is as life + death): Jude 5.

Try & fail to keep all law all the time is sin(fail-u-are), since if you breach any law it's as if you breached all the law: Gal 3:10; Jam 2:10,11. And if you even go there, you become a debtor to do the whole law: Gal 5:3. So anyone's sin results in all being generationally "accursed": Deut, unto the third and fourth generation: Ex 20, by the "curse of the law", makes sinners all, none righteous, no, not one (we all are one), if any fail to keep all law all the time: a mission impossible. And if law is the "strength" of sin's death sting: 1Cor 15:56; Then law is allegorically the "strong man" to first bind in order to spoil the strong man's house (of law: sin and death) in Mt 12:29. Whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: .So bind law, and you bind sin and it's death sting (the wages of sin is death: Rom 6:23; for sin, when it is fininished, brings forth death: Jam 1:15). So basically anyone who goes there, to law, becomes debtor to do all the law: Gal 5:3 all the time: Deut, or else such law imputed sin demands the death penalty. So it's damned if you do and damned if you don't. So of laws(ordinances), Paul says: "touch not, taste not, handle it not".

Yet in saying there's a sin unto death and a sin not unto death, we're allegorically saying there's a law(sin) unto death: namely "the law of sin and death", and a law(sin) not unto death: namely "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus", or the second and better of two laws in Rom 8:2. However in Mt 22: 36-40's law law we're told the second(law) is like the first(law): it's "law"; And "law worketh wrath"(Rom 4:15), which "God hath not appointed us unto"(1Thess 5:9). So we're only talking about the better sin(law) of good/better sins(laws), not about what's best of good/better/best (three things). We're talking of being the better sort of two children: "children of God", instead of "be no more children". We're talking of being the better sort of two servants: "servants of righteousness", instead of "thou art no more servant, but a son". We're talking of being the better sort of two thems, instead of "come out from among them". We're talking of being right of two left/right things on high which are both law(sin), instead of grace that is higher than the (plural and divided) heavens. So we're talking of a fall, from grace, even if the better of two things, which is still not what's best of three things, as grace is. And since grace is neither of two laws(sins), it is by grace ye are saved. Yet it's grace void of law, if led of the Spirit, since "ye are not under law, but under grace, if led of the Spirit". Selah.

So in Christ(is the end of the law: Rom 10:4) there is no sin, because in Christ  there's no law to impute any sin(transgression, trespass). To wit: that God was in "Christ"(the end of the law) reconciling the world unto himself(that God of this/that Gods, the God of all grace, the God of all comfort, the only true God of false/true Gods, the only wise God of foolish/wise Gods, the living God of dead/living Gods, the blessed and only Potentate of such law and grace), NOT imputing their trespasses unto them: 2Cor 5:19. So "that God" is light having no darkness at all (understanding having no ignorance at all) does not nor did not law impute sin, no, not even to "them"(male and female "Adam": Gen 5) who did sin(trespass: go beyond grace is sufficient). Why not? Because law imputed sin makes sinners all, none righteous, no, not one. God is one.

So it reasons God cannot die is allegory for Grace cannot law. It also reasons Christ could not be holden of death, if law is the strength of sin's death sting and Christ(the end of the law) abolished the law, and as if doing the will of God to receive the promise (comes after doing the will of God), the prize, for all, by being first finished a human race all run but one gets the prize.

Two Sons: Son of man vs Son of God

Allegory: The Two Sons of Abraham are The Two Covenants

The "Son of man" is not the "Son of God", for "God is not a man" that he should lie(law) or die(law). So when it comes to the Son "of God", one only, such is not the "first" begotten nor "of the dead", but the "only" begotten and "of the living" God. And God gave His only begotten Son that none should perish. For if even one dies it would be some perish instead of none perish, and if one died for all, then were all dead; which speaks of extinction, not of salvation.


Sons(plural) of God can only occur in heavens(plural) where the "sides" war takes place. Above such, in heaven (higher than the heavens), their are neither sons nor sides to even take, hence no war plausible. Plural "sons" can also speak of plural Fathers, such as the first ascension (of twain ascensions) speaks of ascending to plural Fathers and Gods: my Father "and" your Father, my God "and" your God; whereas the second ascension, to heaven, is notably to appear in the presence of God for us, of them/us; For them speaks of heavens. There are lots of twists in the "mysteries of God", especially near the end; Perhaps even two Lords of the Sabbath: the Son of man notably being Lord "also" of the Sabbath. Yet perhaps such is simply the false of false/true Sabbaths; for the day of God is eternal, not millennial.

Abraham had two sons, by two mothers: these "are the two covenants", and such things are an allegory: Gal 4. But what the script-u-are (of plural and contrary scriptures) saith is: cast out the bondwoman (this Agar = Mt Sinai = law) "and her son" (the result of  law: sin & death). Since such things are an allegory, we're talking His grace does not compromise with law, but rather when grace and truth come law gets "abolished": Eph 2, to the point of "blotting out" ordinances: Clo 2:14, to the point all Mosaic law written in stone and ink is to be "done away": 2Cor 3, to the point what's old, faulty, "ready to vanish": Heb 8:13 "shall vanish": 1Cor 13:8. So, notably in every Pauline Epistle conclusion, including Hebrews & Revelation, there's no mention of law.

2Corinthians 7:10
For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of:
but the sorrow of the world worketh death.

Matthew 24:8 and Mark 13:8 mention several things as being only the beginning of "sorrows" (plural), followed by a myriad of afflictions, killings, hatred, offences, betrayals, more hatred, false prophets rising, deception of many, iniquity abounding, love waxing cold,  and mention of this sort of gospel (plural sorrows thereof) being preached world wide, followed by a question being posed: then shall the end (of sorrows) come? Sadly the answer is no, not yet. Rather it gets worse, by the abomination of desolation being seen standing in the holy place, and those seeing such being told to flee. So another question is posed: then shall be great tribulation, to the point those days have to be shortened for anyone to be saved; Whish is to say is this what you want, sorrows, by having laws? Because even then people will still say law here and law there; But if they do, believe it not., for there (of here and there) shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and perhaps due to whatever you loose on earth being also loosed in heaven. Followed by I told you so, before it happened, along with a second reminder not to go after those saying Christ is in the desert, nor to believe those saying Christ is in the secret chambers. Reason: where the fallen and the dead corpse is, there the high flying vultures will be gathered. So two more questions are posed: then shall be darkness (like in Amos 5:18-20)? and then shall the sign of vengeful Son of man appear in heaven, by which all the tribes mourn? Further warning: do you want this unknown day and hour to be like the days of Noah?  Sorrows? It seems there's no end of sorrow when there's two types of sorrows due to two kinds of laws.

2Corinthians 7:10 mentions and distinguishes two sorrows:  worldly sorrow and godly sorrow; along with clarity worldly sorrow worketh death, but godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation that is not to be repented of. So we're not talking the better of two laws in order to have the better of two sorrows, but of leaving laws for grace, and thereby having no sorrow.

1Timothy 6:10 speaks of plural "sorrows" again, due to some people being led astray by love of money, led away from truth to error, result being sorrows again. So depressed Timothy is warned not to be highminded, but rather to keep on truckin, till in the end (of law) written it's only grace; and no mention of sorrows due to no mention of laws. Grace with you all. Amen.

Two Spirits: Spirit of Error and Spirit of Truth

In 1John 4: 1-6 two spirits are compared and contrasted: spirit of truth -vs- spirit of error; one of such twain being "of God", the other wise "not of God", but rather of anti-christ, of false prophets, which there are evidently "many" (Mt 24: 4,5; Mk 13: 5,6; 1Jn 4:1) of, and who come in the name of God & Son (grace) and say oxymoronish things like I am + am not (Lk 21:8), or sucker: you too can have partiality with an impartial God, or foolish things such as the 2nd of two comings isn't come.

Evidently Jesus Christ, 2nd of twain Adams (1Cor 15) "is come", "greater" of great & greater prophets/kings (Mt 12: 41/42) "is here". All who think other wise (via devilish wisdom: Jam 3) are "false" prophets, spirits "not of God", but of "anti-christ", which is the Spirit of Error.

    Spirit of Error: The Law (was: given by Moses)... Another Law is as Another Error
    Spirit of Truth: Grace (came: by Jesus Christ)... Only the truth shall make you Free

The spirit of truth is evidently (from the biblical evidence given) also the spirit of grace; Whereas spirits of (ye do) err (not k now ing) stem from satanic ministerial folk still mixing contrary things like grace + law, witch ends badly for "them": their end shall be according to their (grace + law) works (2Cor 11:15); for when they shall say peace & safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon "them" (1Th 5:3), a no escape snare ending as badly as good + evil (Heb 5:14), as blessed + cursed (Jam 3:10), as saved + destroyed (Jude 5), as life + death (Heb 11: 13,29), a dead end all bestial dinosaurs had: "was, and is not".

Two Swords Allegory: Sharp & Sharper Swords: Law & Grace:

Sharp twoedged sword: Law  & Sharper sword of the Spirit: Grace

A sharp twoedged sword coming out the mouth of the (arnion) Lamb who bites and smites in Revelation 1:16; 2:12; 19:15 is not the sword of the Spirit is the word of God: Ephesians 6:17, which is sharper than any twoedged sword: Hebrews 4:12. So a twoedged sword is allegorically Law, and the sword of the Spirit: the word of God: is sharper than any twoedged sword: is Grace. Law: the twoedged sword: executes vengeance upon the heathen and punishment upon the people. Grace: the sharper (smarter) sword of the Spirit: having no partiality, is neither vengeful nor cruel. However the sword of the Spirit (which is the word of God) does divide asunder soul<-->spirit and joints<-->marrow to get to the heart of the matter: the heart should be established with grace (above), not laws (beneath), because laws have not profited them occupied therein: Hebrews 13:9. So, in saying the word of God (the sword of the Spirit) is "sharper than any twoedged sword", Paul The Apostle is allegorically saying Grace is smarter (sharper) than either of two Laws. For the second (another law) is notably like the first (law of sin), and the first is sin and death: a dead end.

So of two swords mentioned in Luke 22:38, the only sword that is of God (and the Lamb of God) is the sword of the Spirit: is the word of God: Grace; Which explains why JC said God said both:
    - put away thy sword (law), for all that take up the sword (law) shall perish: Matthew 26:52
    - and he that has no sword (grace), let him sell his garment (law) and buy one: Luke 22:36

              The Two Swords Allegory: Division (Confusion: unrest) vs Peace (rest):
        Law: sharp twoedged sword: bites and smites both ways of Law vs Law ... Confusion
        Grace: sharper sword of the Spirit: upbraideth not (neither bites nor smites)... Peace
        Law brings division: partiality. Grace (will have mercy multiplies peace) brings unity.
        For God is not [the author] of confusion (unrest), but of peace (rest): 1Cor 14:33.

So we know a sword (that's not peace) Jesus (made under the law) brought in Matthew 10:34 is Law, because Luke 12:51 says he brought division, not peace; And John 7:43 says there was division (unrest), not peace, among the people "because of him". Revelation 1:7 also says there shall be global wailing of all kindreds of the earth "because of him", which is to say because of law. There's flaws when there's laws, but where no law, there no transgression to punish: Romans 4:15.

Two Testaments: NT called "Better Testament"

The most obvious twain of all in the Holy Bible containing Old and New Testaments is the two testaments thereof called old/new. As Hebrews 8:7 notes about such first/second covenants, if the first (old) was faultless (perfect), there would have been no need for the second (new). It is also noteworthy the "two covenants" (testaments) are both "allegory" (Galatians 4). The allegory of such law/grace, via Moses/JC, is: they are compared as if lie/truth: John 1:17.

   Good Testament: Old Testament: Grace is as if dead testator, so the law may be of "force"
   Better Testatment: New Testament: Law is made dead testator, in order to establish grace

The fault (imperfection) of the Old Testament? Evidently "the law" (given by Moses: Jn 1:17) was added to "grace is sufficient" (no law req'd), making an Adamic "transgression": Rom 5:14 by which death came upon all: Rom 5:12; 1Cor 15:22. But "where no law, there no transgression": Rom 4:15. Selah. Then more law was "added" again (Mt Sinai: 10 laws) and again (613 Mosaic laws; torah), and "because of transgressions": Gal 3:19 (to make it more obvious law had been added in first place. For the woman to be "in the transgression": 1Tim 2:14 there obviously had to be a law added (where no law, there no transgression). Selah.

Solomon, in his Ecclesiastes, sums up the grace + law(added) "works" of the Old Testament as being "all vanity and vexation of spirit", noting such plural works are "under the sun": earthy, and by allegorically noting "nothing new under the sun", nothing is made perfect by law added. In comparison and contrast the heavenly (singular) "work" that God sent His Son to do, and which notably got "finished" even before the cross where law got nailed as enmity, is a work of grace only, truth only thereof, the knowing thereof said truth(about the law), making you free, makes you as perfect (Mt 5:48), as merciful (Lk 6:36), as the God of all grace is perfect.

Paul The Apostle sums up the conclusion of the Old Testament as "God(law) concluded them all in unbelief", also sinners all, "none righteous". Problem: if the penalty for sin is death, well, such Old Testament, such Law & Prophets, leaves the reader with a hopeless dead end, fear thereof; and since "fear hath torment", tormented. In comparison and contrast, we find that God ("the God of all grace") was in Christ ("the end of the law") reconciling the world unto himself, and notably by "not imputing their trespasses unto them".

Of good/better things, the New Testament is called a "better testament" notably also having a "better hope" of all living happily ever after via a better spokesman, namely Jesus Christ, by which came grace and truth, in comparison and contrast to the law and lie given by Moses. And the better testament ends with his angel playing the last trump it of twain so none perish.

Two Testators: Make The Law Dead Testator of NT

In Hebrews 9, one of the most difficult things I've ever tried to get any Christians, especially ministers thereof, to either see, acknowledge, or understand, is the simple fact there are twain testators, one for each testament; And the testator of the will of God is neither God (who cannot die) nor JC (who could not be holden of death). A testator has to die, stay dead, for a testament to be of any "force", anyone to get their inheritance; else stuck in probate. It says in


Ok, two testaments, so two testators. But only one will of God, immutable x 2, and the same will in both old and new testaments; and by two immutable things, the first allegorically being: God cannot lie(law): "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" (Ps 40:6; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13 ... with a go figure what such meaneth). It meaneth I will have grace, and not law. Heb 10 pretty much clarifies God took no pleasure, none, in any offering or sacrifice, which is "of the law"; and "in him there is no sin"; and whatsoever is not of faith is sin"; and the law is not of faith; so it computes all the way through the Bible. So, for law to be of any force, grace had to be testator of the Old Testament. And for grace to be of any force at all, law has to be testator of the New Testament. It computes, for as Paul clarifies, if you add any law to grace, then grace no more grace. As a little leaven leavens the whole lump, a little law laws the whole grace of God. Paul says it frustrates the grace of God. Law had an expiry date, expired long ago.

In the final analysis there is no law, only grace, which is, is the eternal king in 1Tim 1:17, the only wise God. Wisdom from above: Grace unto you... from God our Father. Grace is, on a throne of "grace", as what your head is crowned with when you embrace understanding in Prov 4. And such is to be firstly pure, then peace-able in James 3. But for the sake of the shew , we have two testators, and when law added in Gen 2:17 it made for transgression, going beyond grace is sufficient, to an oxymoron, a paradoxical war, the result being grace + law = life + death = dead end. And such produced fear (deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage: Heb 2:15). And fear hath torment, which is why, the because, God (perfect love) casts out fear; which is also allegorical for casting out the law. Gal 4 reveals the script u are saith: cast out the woman (this Agar = Mt Sinai = the law) and her son (result of the law: sin and death, fear of death, torment).

In the New Testament we have a testator, law, which got a deadly wound at the cross, nailed (Col 2:14) for being against us, abolished (Eph 2:15) for being enmity; done away (2Cor 3) for being a ministration of condemnation and death; for that which is in part (the counter part of grace) is to be done away when that which is perfect is come. JC is come, so law ought be done away (1Cor 13). Law is old, faulty, ready to vanish (Heb 8:13), and shall vanish (1Cor 13:8). Poof goes the dragon, a flame out. It was only a Phantom menace, a Ghost law, or as Heb 10 calls it a "shadow" of things to come, not the very(true) things. Yeah though I walk through the valley of the "shadow" of death, I will fear no evil (law). It's an allegory, with a moral, also a mystery played out as a shew, "written aforetime for our learning" (Rom 15:4).


Problem is, Christians and ministers thereof keep reviving the law off the cross, where it was nailed as the curse (of the law); so what was, is not, in Revelation, becomes was, and is not, yet is. And as l-o-n-g as such a beast yet is, it manifests all sorts of wrath (law worketh wrath: Rom 4), as if getting shit on from above. The wrath of God, is simply return to sender of any law sent His way via praying amiss, for as the God of all grace, His opinion of law is: none for me thanks. It behooves us all to probate the will of God, see there are two testators, and law has to die for all to have eternal life.

Two Thems:  them vs them  who "oppose them-selves": "them twain"

In such a them/us allegoric mystery, wherein a plural God spake/spoke different things to them/us by prophets/Son, there are also two sorts of them (Adam = them: Genesis 5) distinguished in the shew. Here's some examples where two different sorts of them (male and female Adam) are referenced and distinguished:


In Hebrews 10:39 Paul mentions two sorts of "them". Yet Jesus Christ, Paul, and Peter all clarify it is not them-ward (neither sort of two thems) the Lord is long-suffering unto, but rather unto "us" of "us-ward"; For God hath given "us" the victory through Jesus -> Christ: the end of the law for righteousness. God also declared the end from the beginning saying Let "us" (not them) make man (not child, for what them make is one proselyte: twofold more the child of hell). So be aware the calling out: come out from among "them"(autos) is to come out from even the better sort of them; And search the scriptures, for in "them" (autos, in "Adam": Gen 5:2, in "created" of created/made things) ye think ye have eternal life. Evidently not, for there's only temporal life in them (Adam), even in the better sort of two thems (Adams). For Christ is neither of two Adams (Thems), because as in Adam (Them) all die; Which is to say as in Law all perish.

In the same manner Paul distinguishes two servants in Romans 6; But later clarifies "thou art no more servant" (neither of two sorts) in Galatians 4. He also distinguishes two laws in Romans 7 & 8; But later clarifies "ye are not under the law" (neither of two sorts), but under grace. He also distinguishes two children in Romans 9 (from Matthew 13); But later clarifies "put away childish things" and "be no more children" (neither of two sorts). Allegorically such twain things are as two ways mentioned in Matthew 7; But the third way called "a more excellent way" is neither of the broad nor narrow ways (because a double-minded man is un-stable in all of his ways), just as "charity" is clarified as the "greatest" of "three things", which is neither great nor greater. The third way is also called the "new and living way"; For even the narrow way only "leadeth unto life" as the new of old/new ways; Just as greater of great/greater things "leadeth unto" what's "greatest" of "three things". So also the "us" of "us-ward" is just us: neither of two thems, as man of 1Cor 13:11 is neither sort of child-ren in Matthew 13 and Romans 9 (because the children get cast out in Matthew 8:12), and the "grace" of Jesus->Christ and "charity never faileth" is neither sort of two laws in Romans 7 & 8:

3. Us-ward: Neither of thems; Yet "of them who believe to the saving of the soul".
2. Them: who believe to the saving of the soul... children of God; servants of righteousness;
1. Them: who draw back to perdition ... children of flesh (law); thereby servants of sin

Both of two sorts of them are as Cheribums witch overshadow the -->mercy seat<-- from both sides; and thereby both ends are as a childish latter end worse, due to both sorts of children and both sort of servants being law law: whether law --> law or law <-- law, either way it's a latter end worse. And when it comes to the left/right sides of the divided (against itself) kingdom of Son of Man; Vengeful Son of Man has Revelation 1:7 "wailing" planned for "them all" (for both sorts of them): destruction for them all: Luke 17. Eg: when they shall say Peace and safety, then sudden destruction comes upon them (autos): 1Thessalonians 5:3. So it's not wise to be either sort of two thems. For it seems both sorts of them end in a hall of shame, not fame; and for playing the blame game.

Two Throughs:  Through Jesus-->Christ and Through Christ-->God-ward

Concerning world reconciliation in 2Corinthians 5, it's be ye reconciled (through Jesus --> Christ) --> to God; For it's also noted both peace with God and the eternal sort of salvation are "through Jesus --> Christ", only "in Christ" thereof. Yet it's also further noted thrice it's through Christ --> God-ward that we get to our final reconciliation destination: God. So then there are two trhoughs: through Jesus-->Christ and also through Christ-->God-ward, to be reconciled to God.

Mention is also twice made of "through Christ Jesus", but when analyzed such is in connection with sin imputation and false peace that passeth understanding; Whereas reconciling the world does not law impute sin to them and also doesn't bypass get it: understanding. For the biblical objective is to get it: understanding, and to the point there is no misunderstanding at all; so there be no schism in the body. Not to mention CJ is mirrorly reverse of JC, and JC is the only foundation laid to build on, and eternal salvation is through Jesus Christ. Also mediation for disagreement involves the man CJ, and all who will live godly in CJ shall suffer. So let's not go there, to suffering and mediation; and especially not to reconciled to death unless we take away reonconciled to death to be reconciled to life that is eternal life. For temporal life + death is a dead end, and God did not send his Son to bring us a dead end, but a living end via the end already written, which is the end of law: sin and death, once and for all.

So let us get the order correct: Through Jesus-->Christ, then also through Christ-->God-ward. Many will say, but Jesus is God. Not! God is not a man that he should lie (law), neither Son of man that he should repent (change). So let us not even go there, since two Sons Jesus did not give them rest (peace), but rather division and not peace. So concerning reconciliation it's firstly through Jesus-->Christ to be in Christ, and then through Christ-->God-ward to "be reconciled to God". Such is as if firstly through good-->better for some, and then also through better-->best for all. Same goes for great-->greater-->greatest; As only the greatest of three things never fails. So let us not be twice fallen as Babylon the great<--greater<--greatest; Nor stop at greater can also be greater damnation of damnations. Let us go through great-->greater, and then also through greater-->greatest. For the greatest of three things never fails. Not ever.

Two Trees in the Garden: Life or Death

In Genesis 2 there is a tree of  life and a tree of death, one being good for food, the other only pleasant to look at; for in the day that thou eastest thereof thou shalt surely die. The tree of knowledge of good + evil obviously has a bad ending: evil, so it reasons we ought not go there, not even to the good, if such good + evil ends with evil, such as evil concupiscence , the curse thereof, fear thereof, torment thereof; nor the sin thereof, sting thereof, dead end thereof. JC said God said:

Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt (Matthew 12). Either make the tree grace(good only) or law(evil: corrupt: both good and evil).

Twain trees are also talked about in connection with twain ways in Matthew 7. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit and an evil tree cannot bring forth good fruit. He is talking about grace and law being contrary things, not being able to co-exist, at least not in peace. Hence Shakespeare said: to be or not to be, that is the question; which is a matter of life or death, not life + death. Hence, as Jesus taught, it's grace or law, not both, for they do not mix except as life + death, witch is a dead end, which the Bible does not have.

Two Trumps: the trump of God: Law & the last trump: Grace

If there is a "last trump" mentioned in the Bible, it allegorically denotes there is also a first trump to look for and compare; in the same manner as when the only wise God mentioned, there must also be a foolish God to look for and compare foolish/wise Gods, false/true Gods. This concept seems to reveal two mentions of trump: "the trump of God" in 1Thessalonians 4:16 and "the last trump" in 1Corinthians 15:52. But a study seems to also reveal the trump of God is Law, and the last trump is Grace, when giving more earnest heed to what's said about each; As if the trump of God is the first trump of first trump/last trump in a before/after shew.

Not obvious to many,  the last trump of two trumps is NOT called a trumpet, but rather called a "trump": 1Cor 15:52. Likewise the "trump of God" in 1Thes 4:16 is not a trumpet. In the verses mentioning the last trump, both trump and trumpet are used. So we should not assume the last trump is any shofar or any trumpet sounding any uncertain sound. Rather the last trump is allegory for the conclusion of every Pauline epistle, which is also the conclusion of Revelation, which concludes the New Testament and the Holy Bible containing Old & New Testaments. So the last trump is: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Even less obvious to many is the biblical fact the word "and" occurs often in scriptures, implying two things are being allegorically shewn, for comparison, as the Bible is a comparative teaching about what grace is, in comparison to what it's not: law; kinda like a before/after shew of old/new testaments, each having a (dead) testator thereof; Yet so much more, for it's a two part shew about a third part: what's best, of good better best, for all.

                        Two Trumps: uncertain trump et should not be given "Amen":
                        First Trump et: The Law "was": notably "against" us all. No Amen!
                        Last Trump it: His Grace "is": "with you all". "Amen" (to "that" only)!

In such a before/after shew of law/grace in such old/new testaments, law was allowed to go first, yet when in the new testament of such old/new things, it's what's behind you of ye/you, pure grace being what's up front, as the very (true) thing to come of false/true things to come. So the two trumps are allegorically law/grace, the last trump it being played by Paul: his witness unto all men, yet also faithful steward of the mysteries of God, his angel: Revelation 1.

See the related web page: Paul The Apostle Plays The Last Trump It in every Pauline Epistle, especially Revelation..