Two false/true Christs to compare vs be reconciled to God

In Matthew 24:24 and Mark 13:22 it mentions false Christs shall arise, who will shew great signs and wonders, and to deceive (seduce) the very elect if possible. As told before, appearances can be deceiving, so judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. Included with mention of false Christs arising is what man will say: if any man shall say law here or law there (concerning Christ is the end of the law) the advice regarding such crap is "believe it not". True Christ, and true Christ-ians thereof, will not accuse (John 5:45), nor condemn (John 3:17; 8:11); Which is to say true Christ and true Christ-ians will not law impute sin for the hell of it, nor ministrate condemnation (damnation) to any. For there is no partiality with God and law judging is self-condemning with consequences like tribulation and anguish. Such happens to them saying Peace and safety in law (worketh wrath). It's a lie. God hath not appointed us to wrath; Which is to say Grace hath not appointed us to law. Grace will have Mercy, which multiplies Peace. In comparison and contrast Law will have Sacrifice, which multiplies swordy Division, and blood shed that does not purge all things.

So we should learn the difference between Christ Jesus, which end focuses on swordy two Sons Jesus brought division, not peace; And Jesus Christ, which end focuses on one Son Christ is our peace, not divided. For many are the Jesus fanatics who say Jesus (division) is Christ (peace). Unconverted Peter said it, and was called Satan shortly afterward. So let us learn that God is not [the author] of confusion (unrest), but of peace (rest). Peace with God is through our Lord Jesus --> Christ, in Christ thereof; Not through Christ --> Jesus, in Jesus thereof. The difference is as between harmful law and harmless grace. Harmful law, being both good and evil, can bring both salvation and destruction. Harmless grace, which is good only, brings only salvation; And encourages all to endure unto the end (of the law).

Reconciliation unto God is done "in Christ"; But in the final analysis reconciled is by and unto that God can't lie nor die, not to Jesus lied and died nor to false/true Christs arise from the grave; Also a grave subject involving sacrifice, which higher God will not have: not then, not now, not ever. So above and beyond what is only authored by the true Christ of through our Lord Jesus --> Christ is the reality of true peace authored by that God can't lie nor die. For eternal life of eternal salvation authored by true Christ is not life after death, but life void of death; Which is pure grace void of law, which is mercy void of sacrifice, which is peace void of division. Such is to say grow in grace higher than divided grace in law/grace heavens, through Christ --> God-ward; For only in the heaven higher than the heavens is it "harmless". Such is to say not only get it right of left/right things on high, but also go on unto what's higher of high/higher: perfection. For there's no false/true parts, no partiality nor any hypocrisy in the perfect-ion of God's first pure wisdom from above. So when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part (even grace of law/grace) is to be done away. For even grace of law/grace is still division, not peace; still part-iality, not perfect-ion; still a sides war, not true peace above. Higher God neither makes sides nor takes a side in a sides war; as all sides wars have side effects to both sides. So in the final analysis, we even leave plural divided God on high for higher God is neither plural nor divided; Which is to say leave the living God with plural hands (is both fearful and a fall) for the God of the living is not the God of the dead. For the only way we can establish that God: the God of all grace, is let the God of divided law/grace be dead testator.

What the Spirit saith "unto the churches"(division) vs Christ and "the church"(unity)

The Apostle Paul frequently uses both "churches" and "church", but finally makes a distinction between "churches" and the unified body of "Christ" called the "church" in Ephesians 5. For when dealing with plural (double minded) "churches" he often has to contend with carnality, partiality, and divisions among childish saints who have not yet understood Christ is the end of the law, Christ (the end of the law) is the head of the church, and Christ is the head of every man, not child. God (the head of Christ) said let us make child/man; So in Ephesians 4 Paul says be no more children. Paul to childish Corinthians: when I became a man (grace), I put away childish things (laws: cover ups, carnality, partiality, divisions).

In the allegorical last state of man worse (more the child of hell) called the Revelation (Uncovering) of John we find these (seven) things are in the "churches", which are "without": Revelation 22:15,16
1. dogs: turn back to their own vomit: law
2. sorcerers: like magicians, do lying signs and wonders
3. whoremongers: claim to be espoused to grace, but whore with law
4. idolaters: idol-ize religious and political leaders
5. murderers: prefer sacrifice, thereby condemn the guiltless, thereby condemn themselves
6. makers of lies (laws)
7. lovers of lies (laws)

Two Sons Jesus was head of children (them: male & female Adam); So childish plural "churches" focus more on Jesus (children vs children division) of mediator Christ --> Jesus than on the Christ (peace) of reconcilor Jesus --> Christ. One Son Christ is head of the "church" (Head & Body). So Paul notes we are "the body of Christ" (not body of Jesus). Jesus was made under the law, and of woman. Christ is the end of the law, and thereby the end of transgression also. We are not under the law, but under grace; Is to allegory say we not under Jesus (division), but under Christ (peace).

    The gospel of Paul is notably not the gospel of Jesus (division); Which focuses on being right of left/right division.
    It is the gospel of God: Grace and the gospel of Christ: Peace.; Which focuses on being higher of high/higher.

Plural "churches" usually end up bewitched (deceived). Example: Galatians. Seven times, unto seven "churches" of Asia, we find: He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the "churches". Since Galatians is the only book written "unto the churches", what the Spirit saith "unto the churches" is thereby found in Galatians, not in Revelation. Both are written and signed by Paul, but Revelation is allegorical satire on "servant" John turning back to law behind him; For in John 15:15 servant is a kNOW not, and not a friend. In Galatians it is noted the law is not of faith, no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, and if justified by the law, then Christ (the end of the law) is of no effect to you.

It's sad that in sending ppl to churches, as evangelastic Billy (goat) Graham does, what they're often sent to is confusion, partiality, hypocrisy, accusation, condemnation, sacrifice, tithing, shuning... all sorts of swordy "division", not peace. Granted, not all hypocrites are in churches, but most got this way (leavened) from legalistic ppl of bewitched churches.

I've visited many churches having many Pop-$ickle flavors of Protestant & Roman Catholic christianity, also several Messy-anic & Orthodox Jewish sin-agogues. I found some truth in all such, but never the truth in any. Yet the more global minded churches become, the less partiality they have. So let us focus on global reconciliation unto God, which is done in Christ (not Jesus), but in the final analysis it's reconciled by and unto that God can't lie nor die. So churches still have to real-ize life eternal of everlasting punishment/life eternal is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life. Eternal life is not life after death, but life void of death, by grace void of law, is mercy void of sacrifice, is peace void of division. That sort of peace, true peace, is not right of left/right, but higher of high/higher: above: higher than the heavens: is harmless.

Two Comforts: Both Comfort + Discomfort -vs- Higher Comfort void of discomfort

Many take comfort in believing there is Peace and safety in rule of Law; But Law worketh wrath (Romans 4:15), and wrath is destructive (harmful) rather than constructive (harmless); Also destructive after presumably being constructive. Eg: Jude 1:5 notes Exodus folk: them saved out of Egypt, notably got both saved and destroyed, destroyed afterward. So God hath not appointed us to wrath (law); For when they shall say Peace and safety (in rule of law), then sudden destruction (law worketh wrath) comes upon them. Law tends to puff up and then cast out even those right of law/law rather than edify up to grace of law/grace and exhort to go on higher of high/higher where it is harmless (comfort only).

    Prophecy (Law: good and evil): has both comfort and discomfort... the worse-end to a-void
    Prophesy (Grace: good only): edifies and exhorts to comfort only... "the end" to endure unto

Because law is both good and evil (bad end), law has both comfort and discomfort (bad end). Law seems to have seven kinds of comfort that end in discomfort if law is not put away as a childish thing (blessed + cursed = accursed) that ends being made one proselyte: twofold: more the child of hell; the last state of man that is worse instead of better. Eg: The Revelation (Uncovering) of St John as a "servant", as if a servant in Mt 18 that's both forgiven and unforgiven by schoolmaster law fails every student; As if a dog that turned again to his own vomit: law ("behind" him): 2Peter 2:22. For law is inexcusable: law also condemns those who law judge others. Law also imputes unpardonable sin, making eternal salvation a mission impossible until law is abolished (put away, done away, blotted out, to the point of vanish). In the same allegoric manner God said let us make child/man, the chanGe of servant/friend in John 15:15 is as law/grace. Only when we have grace void of law: mercy void of sacrifice: peace void of division do we have allness of that God upbraideth not: neither bites nor smites. Thereby we have comfort (grace) only instead of comfort and discomfort (law).

    Eg: Luke 16:16 notes a chanGe: The law and the prophets were until John (the Baptist: aka Elijah),
    [but] since that time the KofG (JC grace and truth) is preached and every child/man presseth into it.

In comparison and contrast to Law is destructive (harmful) when studied out, Grace is constructive (harmless) when studied out.  Because Grace is good only, Grace has comfort only. Yet the sort of Grace that is harmless (comfort only) is only in heaven higher than the heavens, above all the law vs law and law vs grace sides wars on high have side effects. So we should not remain right standing in grace of law/grace, as it stands in jeopardy every hour of being lawed again; And life eternal (Matthew 25:46), right of everlasting punishment/life eternal, is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life. Such childish grace of law/grace division is actually disgrace when studied out. For grace of law/grace is still division, not peace; still partiality, not perfection; still a sides war having shame as a side effect for playing a blame game. So instead of being right of left/right (division), we should focus on being higher of high/higher is harmless (comfort only). In other words we should be no more children of children vs children, and be no more servants of servants vs servants. For children of the kingdom get cast out: Mt 8:12, and a servant in Matthew 18 got both forgiven and unforgiven after. Two Sons Jesus (division: unrest) was head of children; But One Son Christ (peace: rest) is head of every child/man.

Jesus was seen right "standing" by Stephen in Acts 7:55. Such resulted in Stephen being cast out and stoned to death.
Christ (Colossians 3) "sitteth" above (higher than L/R heavens) where it's harmless (unity) instead of harmful (division).
 
 Standing right on high denotes unrest (division). Jesus brought division, not peace. Jesus did not give them rest.
 Sitteth right (above) denotes rest (peace, unity). Christ is our peace (not war). Reconciliaiton is done "in Christ".

God is one, but a mediator is not of one (God). Jesus is mediator in Sion, but Sion has a stumblingstone to stumble on.
God is [the author] of peace (rest); And peace with God is "through our Lord Jesus --> Christ", only in Christ thereof.

Instead of being either of them vs them oppose themselves with law vs law, or better of law/grace provided for them/us is still division, not peace, our focus should be us-ward is unity of the Spirit above all the sides wars, and is neither of them vs them, nor us of divided them/us on high. For even us of them/us still has partiality, and is still division, not peace. So we should leave both of the two comforts mentioned in 1Thessalonians 4:18 and 5:11, even though 5:11 comfort edifies up-right of them/us is better than cloudy rapture theories comfort of 4:18 lead to destruction of them in 1Th 5:3. Prophesy unto men edifies (up-right) and exhorts (go higher) unto comfort only above what's right of left/right division. Comforts in both 1Th 4:18 and 1Th 5:11 are 'parakeleo' comfort, which has potential for both comfort and discomfort; But 'paramuthia' comfort above all sides wars speaks not only of being perfected, but also of strengthened and settled. Such is to say a more excellent way is neither broad nor narrow minded of the two broad/narrow ways on high; Since James 1:8 tells us plural ways (broad/narrow ways: Matthew 7:13,14) is as being double minded: unstable both "ways".

Two Comforters: in the "verily verily" gospel according to (doubleminded) John

"Comforter" is only mentioned in "the gospel according to John", which is notably the only "verily, verily" gospel account (others are "verily"), wherein John is more beloved, but it's only "according to John", who's later allegorized as still being a servant (not friend) and a dog turned again to his own vomit (law) by Paul in The Revelation (Uncovering) of St John. In "verily verily" John two Sons Jesus plays two parts: Son of man and Son of God in John 5, which also notably has two resurrections, both from the grave. The latter of this grave subject: resurrection, is the resurrection of damnation. Such isn't said to bring accusation (John 5:45) or condemnation (John 3:17; 8:11) to verily verily John or two Sons Jesus, but to enlighten and put up a caution sign when reading John's writings; especially his mentions of Comforter. Mention of "another Comforter" denotes more than one Comforter to sort out, like Paul's mention of "another gospel" denotes more than one gospel to sort out, even though another is no gospel (good news), like "another law" isn't grace.

    The first Comforter is Two Sons Jesus' Father sent, namely the Holy Ghost ... Law (comfort + discomfort)
    The second sort of Comforter is One Son (Christ) sent, namely the Spirit of truth ... Grace (comfort only)

    We are not under the law if led of the Spirit: Galatians 5:18. God is a Spirit (not a Ghost).
    He taketh away the first (Law), that he may establish the second (Grace): Hebrews 10:9.

John allegorically notes the difference between Law and Grace as if Lie and Truth in John 1:17:
The law (lie) was given by Moses,              ... law has both comfort + discomfort
but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.   ... grace and truth have comfort only

An example is law comfort mentioned in 1Thessalonians 4:18 is soon followed by discomfort in 1Thessalonians 5:3;
But a second comfort which edifies (instead of puffing up with rapture theories) is mentioned in 1Thessalonians 5:11.

Comforter1: Prophecy (Law: good and evil): has both comfort + discomfort.  ... Holy Ghost ... highmindedness
Comforter2: Prophesy (Grace: good only): edifies and exhorts to comfort only ... Spirit of truth ... higher minded

Sadly many still take comfort in Ghostly Law, which eventually turns out to be both comfort + discomfort: ends badly. When studied out, Law is the sort of schoolmaster that fails every student, and the Holy Ghost gets nasty if provoked. So let's note the gospel of Paul is not the gospel of Jesus, but the gospel of God: Grace and the gospel of Christ: Peace. Paul isn't hung up on what's right of left/right "division", but focused on what's "higher" of high/higher: "unity of the Spirit".
For what's right of everlasting punishment/life eternal in Matthew 25:46 is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life.

Two Commanders of Noah: LORD (LAW) vs God (Grace)

Scientists globe trotted to see what, if anything, is common to man, and found only one thing common to man: a legend of the deluge (flood). Every tribe of every culture seems to have a legend of a great flood. Yet more literate folk looking at Noah's Ark allegory in Bibles don't seem to notice Noah had contrary commands from two contrary Commanders about loading the ark. God (Grace) said two of each, not perceiving any unclean, nor requiring any sacrifice afterward. LORD (LAW) said take by twos and sevens, sevens of clean and fowl, evidently for sacrifice (slaughter) afterward.

    God (Grace), being good only, saw only good x7 in Genesis 1, very good the 7th time.
    LORD (Law): being both good and evil: double minded,  sees both clean and unclean

Clever Noah did both "all God commanded" + "all the LORD commanded"; But such Grace + Law later turned out to be Life + Death for him also, after the sort of grace he found in the eyes of the LORD (LAW) saved only eight souls. Albeit this grace Noah found in the eyes of the LAW kept seed alive until Christ; But this sort of grace was not merciful. When studied out, even the saved got destroyed after, like Exodus folk got both saved and destroyed afterward: Jude.

So we find Noah listed in Hebrews 11's blame game hall of shame, which concludes God hath provided some better thing for us than playing a blame game ends in a hall of shame. Yet when looking at what this plural divided God on high provided for them/us, at some better thing provided for us, it's still not what's best for all. For even if we get it right of them/us (law/grace) on high, it's still division, not peace; still part-iality, not perfect-ion; still a sides war having jeopardy; still a blame game. So we're Hebrews 6 told leave highminded law/grace (them/us) principles to go on unto perfection.

Example: Hebrews 1:
spake<--GOD-->spoke
law<--GOD-->grace
to them<--GOD-->to us
time past<--GOD-->last days
by prophets<--GOD-->by Son ("better")... but "go on" unto perfection (what's best for all)... endure unto the end.
So in going on, we leave plural divided GOD on high, for higher God is one, not one of twain, but one above twain.
For it is now the third day, which is neither time past nor last days, as the last day is not plural nor divided, but one.
The seventh day (last day) has no mention of evening and morning (plural: darkness and light) as six other days do.
So also that God is light, and in him there is no darkness (day of the LORD) at all. So be reconciled unto that God.

Example: 1Thessalonians 5:3 vs 5:9 (them/us scenarios):
5:3 when they shall say Peace and safety (in law), then sudden destruction comes on them
5:9 God hath not appointed us to (law worketh) wrath ... (better for us)... but go on to what's best for all in the end.

Such is to say leave being right of left/right division on high, for higher of high/higher is "harmless", as our high priest did. For in Matthew 25:46 what's right of everlasting punishment/life eternal is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life. God said let us make child/man. Blessedness of man says: blessed the child/man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. The law and the prophets were until John, but since that time the kingdom of God (JC grace and truth) is preached, and every child/man presseth into it. When I became a man, I put away childish things. Christ is the head of every child/man. So we should put away childish grace Noah found in the eyes of the LORD (LAW), for higher Grace having no law, and true Peace thereof, in the same manner that God is light, and in him there is no darkness (day of the LORD) at all.

When speaking of plural "commandments" in Ephesians 2:15 and of contrary Commander(s) for comparison, allegoric reference is not to 10 Commandments nor 613 laws in the Torah, all of which were added because of the transgression; But rather to plural and contrary "commandments" spoken of in Ephesians 2:15, which refer to Genesis 2: 16-vs-17; and to Christ (the end of the law) abolished "the law" of  such grace vs law "commandments" to become "our peace". For law and grace are contrary things that can't co-exist in peace, and mixture of contrary things makes an oxy-moron.

        Ephesians 2:15
    Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, [even] the law of commandments [contained] in ordinances;
    for to make in himself of twain one new man, [so] making peace

    Genesis 2: 16 -vs- 17 (every tree -vs- not every tree)
    Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat  ... grace
    But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it:  ... law
    for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Contrary things cannot co-exist in peace, grace + law thereof being contrary things, taken together make an oxymoron: every tree -vs- not every tree. When a line is drawn between Gen 2:16 -vs- 2:17, we find what's above is the grace of God: "of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat"; and such by itself ("my grace is sufficient for thee") is impossible to disobey, till a law gets added below it, and by a LORD not only attaching to, but usurping God as a LORD-God, thereby making such LAWED-Grace not only an oxymoron, but impossible to obey, and the end thereof such grace + law is a dead end: "surely die". The law thereof is the accuser and condemner of all who go there.

Hence our Lord JC did not even go there, neither obeyed nor disobeyed law, gave law no place (eg: Matthew 24:21: was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be) other than a counter part (to be done away) in an allegorical comparative teaching shew, to shew us what grace is, compared to what grace is not: law.

It reasons there had to be a law way back there somewhere, and even before the ten commandments and torah laws, if told "the woman being deceived was in the transgression" (1Timothy 2:14), and "where no law, no transgression" (Romans 4:15), and the (other) law "was added", and "because of the transgression" (Galatians 3:19); And furthermore "the law" (Christ abolished) was given by Moses (John 1:17), not received by Moses as the 10 commandments were.

Since all other law was added, and because of the transgression (because of the law in Genesis 2:17 given by Moses), abolition of the law (of commandments): one lousy tree law, effectively abolished all the law written in stone and ink (which Paul notes should be done away in 2Corinthians 3; put away as the put off, blotted out to the point of vanish).

It reasons if Christ abolished the law (Genesis 2:17) of commandments (Genesis 2:16,17), then no need to add 10 more at Sinai (which was so Horeb-bull even Jews requested abolition of law: Deuteronomy 18:16,17), nor 613 more Torah laws to make it painfully obvious the law given by Moses caused the woman (church) to be in the transgression. All law written in stone and in ink is to be done away as if so old (stale dated), faulty, and vexing that it's not only ready to vanish (Hebrews 8:13), but shall vanish (1Corinthians 13:8), as mirrorly a counter part in a law -vs- grace God shew,
to shew us what grace is, compared to what grace is not: law; and by shewing us what mercy is, compared to what mercy is not: sacrifice; and by shewing us what peace is, compared to what peace is not: division. When the shew is ended properly, as written, with no mention of law: sacrifice, division, then it never happened, nor ever will happen.

Two Crowns: Corruptible Law Glory vs Incorruptible Grace Glory

Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain. And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible. I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air



Of two glorys: corruptible -vs- incorruptible crowns: law -vs- grace: they -vs- we "run" the human "race" to obtain, actually only the incorruptible crown of grace glory is even obtain-able in the l-o-n-g run... which endureth unto the end. For if one endures to the end of Revelation, which is authored by Paul, there is no corruptible crown (law) mentioned. All that diligently tried to attain righteousness of the law failed to attain it: Romans 9:31, Because their schoolmaster: law was the sort of master that fails every student (I will forget you and I will forsake you), and should be put away: Galatians 3; For when they say Peace and safety (in law), then sudden destruction cometh on them: 1Thessalonians 5:3. Only in a short run is law glory even plausible, but not for long, since law worketh wrath is destructive, not constructive. So we hear this about law priests: not suffered to continue by reason of death: Hebrews 7:23. Not to mention they who run the human race to obtain a corruptible crown: law, run not unto the end of sorrows, but to the beginning of sorrows.

Two law/grace crowns are pictured in biblical emblems I found on Old and New Testament title pages in an old Bible; But the two smaller (childish) crowns are before a book open proper. A Large Crown pictured in a changed biblical emblem is undivided Grace. That Crown contains the volume of two law/grace crowns previous, as if to picture better blessed man (of child/man) finally put away harmful left/right division for higher of high/higher is harmless unity of Spirit.

Solomon the wise guy says get (obtain) wisdom, but also exhorts "with all thy getting, get understanding", which is above and beyond puffed up knowledge of devilish wisdom: law. He clarifies in Proverbs 4 that when understanding is embraced the result is thy head (Christ the head of every man) gets "crowned" with grace glory of two glories Paul allegorizes as two crowns. Paul The Apostle speaks of "the race set before us", and of their part vs your part, and a "prize" to "obtain" by win (be first "finished") the race, a l-o-n-g and lively "run" along "with patience": Hebrews 12, which endures unto the end, where there is no corruptible crown: law, only incorruptible grace that's with you all.

Two Damnations: Greater Damnation and Eternal Damnation

Damnation is only plausible by law: Romans 5:13. Merciful grace does not damn (law) anyone: 2Corinthians 5:19. Damnation is childish of child/man: Blessed the child/man to whom the Lord will not impute sin: Romans 4:8; But also occurs with double-minded man who can't make up his mind about child or man: law or grace: damnation or salvation.

First mention of damnation is "greater damnation", allegorically as if from greater law, unto those who sit in Moses' seat: Matthew 23. They're called child of hell hypocrites, fools, vipers, whited sepulchres, serpents, and blind guides (if blind lead the blind, both fall) who shut up the kingdom of heaven to all with their law; Also compass land and sea to make one proselyte twofold more the child of hell: last state of man worse, not better. Greater damnation is to such like.

Jesus, made under the law (Galatians 4), notably said this about himself: a "greater" is here: a greater prophet than Jonah (only had a great fish story), and greater king (of the Jews) than Solomon (only built a great temple of doom). So Jesus, using law more lawfully, first brings "greater damnation"; But not to those made worse, rather to those who made them worse, to those who sit in Moses' seat, which is merciless, for all who despised Moses' law died "without mercy": Hebrews 10:28. In another place Jesus says to them who forbid (law) children that a "millstone" necktie drowning would be a better end for them. Moses was only a "great terror"-ist. If you're into the horror of Horeb-bull law, Jesus was greater at it as King of the Jews. He gave his Olivet Discourse seated in a graveyard (Mount of Olives) over against the temple he doomed first; And to them who wanna be right of his left/right division thereof, notice what's right of such everlasting punishment/life eternal is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life. So Jesus was a greater law-yer, a master at reversing things, like with(grace) or against(law) in Matthew 12:30, ends bad when applying Hebrews 10:9's take away the first to establish the second, kinda like the second law in Mt 22:36-40 many Romans 8:2 folk like to establish by take away the first; Not knowing it's like establishing the resurrection of damnation (John 5:29). In comparison and contrast to Jesus (made under the law) and his greater damnation to those who sit in Moses' seat, Christ is the end of the law (damnation), and the head of every child/man. For the law and the prophets were until John, but since that time the kingdom of God (grace and truth) is preached, and every child/man presseth into it: Luke 16:16.

So when it comes to greater damnation of greater law, Jesus was greater at it because he's "Lord also" of the Sabbath made for man (since man can have a last state worse); And therein such a Sabbath having a Lord also (Son of man) he's an 'arnion' Lamb who bites angels and smites nations in Revelation, which is allegorically like a black Sabbath called the day of the LORD (LAW), which is darkness and not light in Amos 5:18, with woe (stop it, or else) to those who desire such a LAW<--Law last day. So let's avoid such grave darkness, by letting law be the dead testator so grace may be of force to all. If tempted to go to Revelation (Uncovering) of John for a peek, let us first be sure we can endure unto the end of such johnny law dog darkness, the end where there's no mention of law (darkness) at all, thereby no damnation to any: neither great tribulation of law nor greater damnation of law.


Eternal damnation is only plausible by blaspheme against the Ghost: speak against the Holy Ghost (Law), which hath never forgiveness, neither in this world nor the to come (as if law were the to come); Since forgiveness is actually a mission impossible by the law when studied out. By the law it's you first forgive to get forgiveness (eg: Lord's Prayer); But by grace it's God hath forgiven you for Christ's sake, and while you were yet a sinner. Such unconditional forgiveness is only plausible by abolition of law, since law also imputes unpardonable sin, which doesn't pardon anyone. So those who speak against Ghostly law, instead of flusing law as dung, are said to be in danger of eternal damnation. For law was a schoolmaster which failed every student: all who diligently tried to attain righteousness (grace) of the law failed to attain it; So this sort of master should be dismissed, for Christ is the end of the law, not the mend of law.

Damnation seems to be inexcusable (inescapable) by law also damns (laws) them who damn (law) others. If eating and drinking unworthily (trying and failing to keep all the law all the time to a 1000 generations), then law also damns you: Damned if you Do-teronomy and Damned if you Don't-eronomy. Furthermore, by the curse of the law, if any try and fail to keep all law all the time, it's damn every one, or as Galatians 3 puts it: "cursed every one that hangeth on a tree". Law is both good and evil: ends evil: lawed to death by law: the strength of sin's death sting: 1Corinthians 15:56. So law, being both good and evil, is the ministration of death: 2Corinthians 3:7, which is to be done away to have life only instead of both life + death = dead end. It's called the inescapable damnation of hell (law) in Matthew 23:33; For both law law and law vs law eventually become Revelation 13's LAW<--Law via Psalms 110:1, which dictates second Law has to "sit" while first LAW takes "vengeance is mine, I will repay" (saith the LAW to the Law); And the only seat for Law to sit in on high is Moses's seat, which is neither up-right nor merciful. So we are told "be not highminded", for the wickedness which occurs in left/right high places can be damned if Do-teronomy and damned if Don't-eronomy. So we should flush all law as dung to avoid any damnation to any, lest damnation to some become greater damnation to us, or lest we be in danger of eternal damnation of law, which is a gotcha either way. Higher Grace does not law impute any damnation to any, and isn't over against any in any childish left/right sides war having side effects to both sides. So let us leave even what's right of left/right for what's higher of high/higher, since only what's higher is "harmless"; Which is why our new high priest (of old/new high priests) went higher to be seated above, and why God said let us make child/man.

Two (Last) Day(s): The day (darkness) of the LORD (LAW) <--vs--> The day (light) of God (Grace)
As if two Sabbaths to compare in the short run, then pick 1 to hasten (run) unto as your end run of the human race:
they <--vs--> we: they run to obtain a corruptible crown (law), but we run to obtain an incorruptible crown (grace).
But in the l-o-n-g run that endures unto the end of law to be saved, only the incorruptible crown is obtainable for all.

Two Deaths: Die to the law or else Die by the law

If the Bible speaks of a "second death", as it does four times in Revelation 2:11, 20:6, 20:14, 21:8, there is obviously two deaths to consider, compare, contrast. Two biblical allegoric definitions for "second death" are:
- death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death (Rev 20:14);
- the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and
  all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death (Rev 21:8).

Revelation 2:11 mentions not being hurt of the second death by overcoming. Revelation 20:6 has even more than one twist to it, in saying he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years:
Twist1- Lazarus had a first resurrection from the grave, died again, and the place he went was neither unified nor merciful; So the first resurrection, from the grave, is not eternal life, but life of life + death, thereby has a second death. Furthermore "part", partiality thereof, is not perfection. When perfect-ion comes, part-iality is done away: 1Cor 13.
Twist2 - saying a second death hath no power is like saying a second law is harmless, but it's not harmless; Or like saying an 'arnion' Lamb (Son of man) is harmless, when it bites angels and smites nations. Rather what is harmless is not what is right of left/right, but what is higher of high/higher. So our new high priest went higher to be harmless.
Twist3 - saying "they" triggers a warning, for "they" run to obtain a corruptible crown: 1Cor 9:25, and when "they" shall say Peace and safety, then sudden destruction comes on them in 1Thess 5:3. On their part God is evil (law) spoken of. As for law priests (ministers of Satan), their end shall be according to their works: 2Cor 11: 15, which in Hebrews 7:23 is not suffered to continue by reason of death.
Twist 4 - a thousand years [is] as one day: 2Peter 3:8, so the "reign" mentioned is not millennial, but one day called the day of the LORD, comes like a thief. Such is darkness, not light: Amos 5, which speaks of law (death), not grace (life).
So let us not be fooled, deceived, seduced, bewitched, beset by lies (laws) that have partiality, but go on unto perfection and lay hold on eternal life (is not life after death, but life void of death) by let law be dead testator, in order to establish grace will have mercy to all, which multiplies peace to all.

First death is allegorically dying to the law, so we don't die by the law and thereby have problems associated with a first resurrection from the grave being life of life + death, and a second death, or with a second resurrection being the resurrection of damnation (law). Paul says dying to the law is as becoming alive unto God (Grace). Paul also said he died daily, which is to allegory say he flushed law as dung every day. For law is a grave subject. Hence two resurrections from the grave both involve law: the ministration of death. So we ought to put away all law to put away all death, in order to lay hold on eternal life, which is not life after death, but life void of death.

If we all die the first death: die to the law to become alive unto God (Grace), as Christ did and thereby became the "author" of "eternal" salvation, the second death (surely die lie of Genesis 2:17) will have no effect on us. For where no law, there no transgression (Romans 4:15); and when no law, sin is not imputed (Romans 4:8; 5:13). Where no law and when no law is hereafter (Ephesians 2) and now (Romans 8); For when no sin imputed, as in the second and better blessed (Psalms 32:2; Romans 4:8), then there can be no death sting of sin, which law was the strength of (1Cor 15).

            The law and the prophets (servants) were until John, [but]
            since that time the kingdom of God (grace & truth) is preached,
            and every man (of child/man) presseth into it. Luke 16:16

We all ought to reckon ourselves dead to sin (law): Romans 6:11, lest we all become dead by the law killeth (2Cor 3).

Genesis 1 has two earths: "earth" created (Genesis 1:1), and "Earth" made (Genesis 1: 9,10); the latter being called the dry, appears when waters under heaven are let gather together in one place. In Genesis 2 both what's created and made seem to have an end (Genesis 2: 2,3) prior to God rested his case. The end for what's "made" occurs on the seventh day, has no mention of evening and morning (as six other days do in Genesis 1). So, the end we are to endure unto to be saved: eternal grace only, seems to be the end of law (non eternal) for us. However a "finished", for the host of them, for their heavens and earth created, seems to occur after the 6th day, but also before the 7th day (Genesis 2:1). Go figure. It can be confusing if not led of the Spirit; But when led of the Spirit then we are not under the law, but under grace. For God is a Spirit (not a Ghost); And God is not [the author] of confusion (unrest), but [the author] of peace (rest).

    The end (sunteleia) of the world... law prophecy (destructive)... press Delete to take away the first (law)
    The end (teleos) to endure unto... grace prophesy (constructive)... press Save to establish the second (grace)
    Hebrews 10:9 He taketh away the first (law), that he may establish the second (grace) ... Hebrews 13:9,25.

The main thing is what's "created" also gets destroyed, since it's seen as both good and evil: ends bad. What's "made" is not good and evil, but seen by God as "good" only. So in Genesis 1 we find God saw good x6, the 7th time very good. The point of such allegory is God (Grace) doesn't see both good and evil (both clean and unclean), but good only (clean only). So God (Grace) and the LORD (LAW) are two contrary Commanders in the Noah's Ark allegory. Mixing such contrary things (Grace vs Law) not only makes an oxy-moron, but one proselyte with a bad ending. So of an earth created, and an Earth made, let us see what is made perfect is good only, not both good and evil: ends bad. Such is to allegory say let us see grace only, not law. His Grace will have Mercy to all, which multiplies Peace to all.

    So let us begin our Faith --> Hope --> Charity (never fails)
    with hopeful Grace instead of hopeless Law fails everyone,
    so our agape Love is made perfect in Christ, sees only good.

In 2Peter 3, where two days are compared (the day of the Lord vs the day of God), converted Peter talks of not being ignorant of one thing, this, then mentions two things, this and that; And in 2Peter 3:10 he speaks of (twain) heavens and (one) earth being burned up whenever the day of the Lord (Ez 7:19; Zeph 1:15; Job 21:30; Prov 11:4; Psalms 110:5; Rev 6:17), allegorically when "law" worketh "wrath" (Romans 4: 15), cometh as a thief (John 10:10) in the night (Gen 1:5; 1Jn 1:5; 1Jn 2:9) . Go figure. The "elements" 2Peter speaks of are defined by Paul in Galatians 4:3-9 as the bondage of going back to the non eternal days, months, times, years of "law" worketh "wrath" that God (Grace) hath not appointed us to (1Thess 5:9). So we ought to focus only on the eternal (grace), by let non eternal things (laws) be past, as we go on unto perfection.

Two Ends: Dead End (Law) vs Living End (Grace)

There's two ends to consider in a Holy Bible containing Old/New Testaments; As if a Before/After (Law/Grace) shew:
(i)  the end of the Old Testament: fear (torment) of a dreadful day of the LORD (LAW)... all perish by law... their end.
(ii) the end of the New Testament ... the end (of law) to endure unto to be saved... none perish by grace ... y(our) end.
So the New Testament is called a "better testament" having a "better hope" of all living happily ever after, in such a before/after (natural/spiritual) shew. But because "law is spiritual" also, and Son of man is "Lord also" of the Sabbath made for man can also have a last state worse, it's only after you all endure to the end of the law in the New Testament. Such is to say endure unto the last trump in Revelation portrays a black Sabbath called the day of the LORD (LAW), which in the end of the Old Testament the LORD of hosts threat-end would come via the prophet Malachi. So to avoid such dreadful prophecy, we let NT Law be dead testator, lest such LAW<--Law smite the earth with a curse (law). If this happens even the weather gets nasty, and we hear of the beginning of sorrows (instead of the end of sorrows) on the news: sides wars, rumors of wars, famines, pestilences, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, volcanoes, etc.

The Old Testament end (law: both good + evil) ends as bad (evil) as Solomon's conclusion of the whole matter (of law): "fear God", which is an oxy-moron if God is perfect love hath no fear at all, as pure religion (grace) has no law at all, as merciful mercy has no sacrifice at all, as true peace has no divisions at all. For that God (of this/that Gods portrayed) is one, not twain (plural) nor even one of twain (right of left/right), but rather one above all the law vs law and law vs grace sides wars on high. That God "upbraideth not": neither bites nor smites with a curse (law) like plural divided God of the Old Testament did. So two ends are about two different Gods: Law & Grace.

Two ends also occur in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24 & 25; Mark 13; Luke 21):
(i)  the end (sunteleia) of the world ... destruction (law worketh wrath) ... worse-end ... dead end
(ii) the end (teleos) to endure unto to be saved ... salvation (grace) ... the end written ... living end

So in Hebrews 10:9 it says he taketh away the first (law), that he may e-stablish the second (grace). Yet such involves endurance & continuance on y(our) part: endure: continue: go on unto the end where you all are graced so none perish. It's allegorically called us-ward which the Lord l-o-n-gsuffers unto so none perish, but all come to repentance (chanGe). So it's the l-o-n-g run which endures unto the living end, not the short run which does not continue by reason of death. The other wise: their end of their part, seems to be "not suffered to continue by reason of death" (law: sin and death). So we should not go there to law's sin and death: dead end, since eternal life is not life after death, but life void of death; Nor should we be satisfied with what's right of left/right division isn't peace, but go on to what's higher of high/higher. God said let us make child/man. Only what's higher of high/higher is "harmless". What's right of left/right division in Matthew 25:46 is notably not harmless, since the "life eternal" of such "everlasting punishment/life eternal" is neither "unity of the Spirit" nor "eternal life". Such Olivet Discourse is given from graveyard, over against a doomed temple.

The end of ends, much like the Lord of Lords, is one in which all live (in him there is no law: no sin: no deadly sting), all live happily ever after we realize the fault of Melchisedec type priests was they died by the law instead of to the law; After we grow up unto the fullness of Christ (all grace, no law at all), the head of the body which is the head of every child/man who puts away childish things (laws); After we realize God said what he meant, and meant what he said, in saying I will have mercy (grace), and not sacrifice (law). So the end of law to endure unto is also the end of sacrifice. Sacrifice is by the law, and what's evident from the evidence is that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God. Therefore when man of child/man, put away childish things: laws: sacrifices is required to avoid man can have a last [state] worse if one proselyte: twofold more the child of hell (law); worse-end by seven spirits return with one cast out. For the man who does not put away child and childish things is double-minded, as if an unstable childish-adult, as if an oxy-moron; And there are no oxy-morons in the kingdom of God whose Christ is notably the head of every child/man, which is not what's right of left/right division is neither true peace nor perfection, but is higher of high/higher is harmless. For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace. Peace with God is through Jesus-->Christ, in that Christ (not in Christ of Christ-->Jesus: mediator is not of one), in whom that God (can't lie nor die) reconciles the world unto himself:

Two Enochs: 3rd and 7th from Adam, in whom all die

There's two Enochs and two Lamechs in Genesis 4 and Genesis 5:
Enoch 1: Adam - Cain - Enoch1 - Irad - Mehujael - Methusael - Lamech1 (took two wives)
Enoch 2: Adam - Seth - Enos - Cainan - Mahalaleel - Jared - Enoch2 - Methuselah - Lamech2 - Noah

So Enoch 1 is the third from Adam via Cain, and Enoch 2 is the seventh from Adam via Seth. Similarily Lamech 1 is the seventh from Adam via Cain, and Lamech 2 ninth from Adam via Seth. But there is no respect of persons with God. Both (twain) are from Adam (them), in whom all die. The point of such is this: there is no eternal life in either side of law vs law: divided against itself, nor yet in either side of law vs grace: is still division (not peace) and still partiality (not perfection). Perfection is what we go on unto by leaving twain things, like good + evil resurrection of the dead; Since both are from the grave and the latter of two resurrections is "resurrection of damnation", which not only continues a them vs them sides war from graves, but also damnation of them all. For the kingdom of God isn't right of left/right division, but higher of high/higher which is harmless. In the same manner us-ward, which is accounted as salvation (whereby none perish), is neither of them vs them. For when they shall say Peace and safety (in division and partiality), then sudden destruction comes on them, and they (who presumed they'd escape destruction) shall not escape. So it was with Enoch 2 when studied out. He did not escape destruction he prophesied for others. So also with Noah. His grace + law, which is blessed + cursed, became as life + death to him also. So we find both Enoch and Noah in the hall of shame, notably for playing the childish blame game. For this sort of "godly" is "childish", which is based in law, which James calls "devilish" wisdom.

Many say Enoch 2 did not die because he was raptured, favored because he pleased God. But Romans 5:14 says death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression. Furthermore Enoch 2 wasn't raptured, but "translated", and later appears in the hall of shame for playing the inexcusable blame game: Law. So Enoch 2 is listed in Hebrews 11, which says about them: Law heroes: these all died and received not the promise; Also noting God provided some better thing for "us" than to die and receive not the promise. For Hebrews 10 notes receive the promise comes after do the will of God: have mercy, not sacrifice; is to say have grace, not law; is to say have life, not death, because death is followed by hell: Rev 6.

Thereby let us know that God is not twain, nor even one of twain; Rather God is one above twain. For God is not [the author] of confusion (two Enochs: Hanochs: Henochs; and two Lamechs), but of peace; And God's Christ is not the head of children vs children, but the head of every man (of child/man).


To compound the confusion in the law and the prophets, confusion which God is not the author of, in Hebrew Enoch (Chanowk: dedicated) is also Hanoch and Henoch. So in Genesis 25 & 46 there's also two Hanochs: one of Midian and one of Reuben. Furthermore there are two Henochs in 1Chronicles 1; And Enoch 2 (the seventh from Adam) is therein listed as Henoch 1. Go figure. For of two laws, it is said the second is like unto the first; Also that the first shall be last (via Mt 23 LAW-->Law) and the last shall be first (via Rev 13 LAW<--Law). But of two sorts of grace to compare, the second (JC grace saves only, not saves + destroys; and saves all, not a favored few) is not like the first (Noah grace, found in law, and his grace + law both saved + destroyed 8 souls). So of two ends in the olivet discourse, the end to endure unto, and to be saved only, notably clarifies The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ [be] with you all. Amen. Such is called the last trump; Not first and last. What's first and last state worse, is one proselyte: twofold more the child of hell. How does this relate to two Enochs? Enoch 2 prophesied law judgment and punishment upon others, to his own condemnation; For law judgment is inexcusable in Romans 2:1. It doesn't excuse accusers of the brethren; And Law hath never forgiveness, neither in this world nor the to come. So we shouldn't be like either of two Enochs, but like Christ is the end of law, and thereby our peace.

Of Enoch 1, nothing more is said than a city was named after him in the land of Nod, east of Eden.
Of Enoch 2, Genesis 5:21 notes Enoch 2 walked with God "after" he begat Methusselah (son of the dart, as if to say son of the wicked; for we put on the shield of faith to quench fiery darts of the wicked). Genesis 5:24 notes Enoch 2 walked with God, and he [was] not, for God took him. 1Chronciles 1, which notably has two Henochs, lists Enoch 2 as Henoch 1, the seventh in an ascending genealogy unto Abram, who became Abraham (the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is the God of the living: Grace, as opposed to the God of the dead: Law); And Matthew 1's genealogy, which further ascends 40 (not 42) generations unto "Christ" (not Jesus), notably begins with "Abraham". (Note: Matthew is the book of the "generation" of Jesus-->Christ, not the book of "generations" of Adam, as noted in Genesis 5, which talks of Enoch 2). Luke 3 lists Enoch 2 in the descending genealogy of Joseph, but as the "supposed" father of "Jesus". Hebrews 11:5 notes by faith Enoch 2 was translated that he should not see death; and was not found (not found = lost, and lost = dead in Luke 15's lost and found scenarios), because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God (Law). But Hebrews 10:31 previously notes it is both "fearful" and a "fall", to fall into either of the plural L/R "hands" of the living God: Law. So being translated from left to right of left/right division is still division, not peace. Jude 1:14,15 notes And Enoch 2 also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, to execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard [speeches] which ungodly sinners have spoken against him. The interesting thing about Jude is he's a "servant". In John 15:15 a servant is a kNOW not, for servants know not what their master doeth. So chanGe noted therein is from servant (law) to friend (grace). Jude as servant, is not friend. True grace has no servants; neither servants of sin nor servants of righteousness; For both servants have this in common: servants: prophets, know not what their master (law) doeth. The law and the prophets (servants) [were] until John (the Baptist, Elijah2), but since that time the kingdom of God (JC grace and truth: friends) is preached: Luke 16:16. Grace makes us free of bondage (servants: law) by also revealing we are delivered from the law, and in answer to prayer: deliver us from evil. For law: both good and evil: ends badly.

Two Eternals: "Life Eternal" (Law) is not "Eternal Life" (Grace); And Eternal Damnation (no forgiveness) is not Eternal Savlation (no law).

There's mention of "life eternal" & "eternal life" by two Sons Jesus: Son of man & Son of God. One difference many sheeple don't notice is "life eternal" is mirrorly the reverse of "eternal life", as if applying "many first shall be last and the last first". Tricky allegory. Life eternal is also what's right of everlasting punishment/life eternal in Matthew 25:46's left/right division of goats/sheep. This division (not peace), having partiality to sheep, is not of true God has no partiality and is only merciful, and unto all. Rather it's of a plural spake/spoke God on high: Law: is both good and evil. It is a "fearful" thing to "fall" into the (left/right) "hands" of "the living God" (Law) on high, a fall from "the God of the living" (Grace) above. If fallen to the living God in Christ-->Jesus, it becomes necessary to be risen to the God of the living through Jesus-->Christ, and seated with that Christ above all the left/right sides wars of law vs law (loser vs loser) and law vs grace (division). For right standing with Jesus on high can "stand in jeopardy every hour", the jeopardy (danger) of eternal damnation: hath never forgiveness, which is only plausible by the Holy Ghost (Law), drives people to desiring this right of left/right division, makes others wrong, and just for the hell of it; As if desiring the day of the LORD (LAW), which Amos 5:18 says is darkness and not light. So it is with bewitched churches today, who continue law imputing sin and death for the hell of it; Not knowing iniquities they impute to be forgiven and sins they impute to be covered, get unforgiven and uncovered by their law is both good and evil, ends badly, with evil concupiscence and death. Yet they would be reconciled to death, so they can continue their sides wars from graves, and have two resurrections, the latter of twain being resurrection of damnation, so that they can even have war in heaven by two wonders appearing in heaven results in Michael vs Dragon: angels vs angels; Not knowing such servants vs servants is a kingdom divided against itself: falls to desolation (ruin). Thank God the word worst doesn't occur in the New Testament, where a worse-end ends grace us,
when such scape-goats vs dumb-sheeple both put away their law law for grace is sufficient. For such law vs law can result in Revelation 13 LAW<--Law, and vengence is mine saith LAW to Law.


Eternal salvation is not life + death followed by resurrections from graves, but rather life only by grace only, eternal life void of death instead of life eternal: endless life + death + hell follows death. So let us have eternal life of eternal salvation in higher heaven instead of endless hell (law) on earth by being cast out of left/right heavens on high having childish sides wars, side effects to both sides by remaining children vs children instead of hearing the higher calling to be no more children at all, since God said let us make child/man, and his Christ is the head of every child/man, and because the law and the prophets were until John, but since that time the kingdom of God (grace and truth) is preached and every child/man presseth into it; As there are no children vs children sides wars nor childish-adult (oxy-morons) in the kingdom of God. Neither a child (differs nothing from servant) nor his lord (as long his lord has servants remains childish: hellish) can inherit the kingdom of God. For grace of law/grace isn't much better than law of law/law, which is loser vs loser; Because when studied out JC grace is not against any, but with you all, and Noahic grace of law/grace is division, not peace, also partiality, not perfection. So standing fast in Noahic grace of law/grace does notably "stand in jeopardy every hour", which is about the time space of so many sin-agogue and church-y (Gog and Magog) services still law imputing sin's death sting (surely die lie) for the hell of it; Not knowing such inexcusable law not only imputes sin, but unpardonable sin unto all, not some only. So there's no accuse others and excuse me in inexcusable law, but eternal damnation to all who do.

So let us not have two eternals such as eternal damnation (law) and eternal salvation (grace), especially if eternal damnation hath never forgiveness via a Holy Ghost and eternal salvation is above forgiving one another via a Holy Spirit. God is not two Holies. God is a Spirit (not a Ghost). Bible compares two Holies, but in the final analysis it's not a Holy Holy Bible, but the Holy Bible. Nor let us have two eternals such as life eternal is right of left/right hands of the living God on high is fearful and eternal life is higher of high/higher of the God of the living is love void of fear. Let's have one eternal God only, whose Christ is the end of the law, not the mend of law, who authored eternal salvation only, and by abolition of law is also abolition of sacrifice; Because sacrifice is also by the law and evidence makes it evident that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God.

Two Faiths: Blind Faith (Law) and Seeing Faith (Grace)

chanGe: "from faith to faith": from trust in law to trust in grace, as if from blind faith to seeing faith
Romans 1:17 says the righteousness (grace) of God (in the gospel of Christ is the end of the law Paul is not ashamed of) is revealed "from (blind) faith to (seeing) faith" ... Similar to how we all are (being) changed "from glory to glory" as by the Spirit (2Corinthians 3:18). Such allegoric talk suggests two faiths and two glories in a twain shew (plural of show) comparing good/better faiths, better faith being much more glory us: the faith (grace) of the Son of God by which we're saved instead of saved + destroyed like grace + law Exodus folk: Jude 1:5...

"the faith [of faiths], of the Son [of Sons], of God [of Gods]"...
in the allegoric (Galatians 4:24) triple mystery (Colossians 2:2) to solve,
in plural and contrary scriptures written aforetime for our learning (Romans 15:4).

    Whatsoever is not of faith is sin: Romans 14:23
    And the law is not of faith: Galatians 3:11,12 ...

    So we should begin Faith --> Hope --> Charity (never fails)
    with hopeful grace instead of hopeless law fails every student.

    John 5:45 Do not think I (grace) will accuse you to the Father;
    there is one that accuseth you, Moses (law) in whom ye trust.

Of two faiths spoken of in the Bible one such is "little" faith, "childish" faith, which puts trust in law; which is shewn in John 5:45 and again in Hebrews 11 to be as blind faith in comparison to some "better" thing God hath provided for us, the evidential (seeing) faith by which we are saved, which is by "the faith of the Son of God".

Of then/now faiths, "now" faith is the "substance" of things hoped for, the "evidence" of things not seen. Such refers to "better" hope of good/better hopes, and the seventh of seven hopes to sort out in such an allegorical mystery as the God shew; For in Hebrews 11: 13, 29 good hope of old blind faith law heroes had only produced this: these all died and received not the promises nor the promise.

Sadly many ministers today also climb such a blind faith law ladder to heaven, as Moses did, a ladder which dead ends short of entering... they enter not in themselves, and thereby hinder all from entering since it's all or none at all with God: "there is no respect of persons with God", who will have all men saved and fully aware what they're saved from: law, and will not have sacrifice (is by the law)... see Ps 40:6; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13; Heb 10:all for confirmation and details.

Sadly we find ministers saying to people who came to them for healing and leave unhealed: you didn't have enough faith. But "all" who came to Jesus Christ were healed as he went about healing "all" manner of sickness and disease: Matthew 4:23 of "all" who were "oppressed of the devil" (the law): Acts 10:38... oppressed to the point of being sick, by such vexing law of grace + law of religious leaders, which is as if blessed + cursed with life + death, a dead end. So it reasons law is naot only the root source of sickness and dis-ease, but also death.

Paul allegorically says in Galatians 2: 20, 21:  "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by "the faith" of "the Son" of [the] "God" ... for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain". Obviously then, righteousness is not attainable by the law. All who diligently tried to attain righteousness (grace) of the law failed to attain it: Romans 9:31. So this makes law the sort of schoolmaster which fails every student. Pharisees, who themselves put faith in the law, also demanded others trust law; But JC says of such: if the blind lead the blind, both fall in the ditch.

Paul clarifies the death Christ died was to the law, thereby became alive unto God. We oughta reckon ourselves dead to law likewise, put away the surely die lie of law: Genesis 2:17, which only turns out to be a ministration of death if believed (1Cor 15:56; 2Cor 3:7; James 1:15; Jude 5; etc). Genesis 2:16+17 = oxymoron (every tree + not every tree; surely live + surely die) with a bad ending: life + death = dead end. Pick one only of good + evil (grace + law), either make the tree good or evil (grace or law), not both, since both is an oxymoron. Pick one faith of twain, the faith of perfect love [God] which is neither blind nor both love + fear, rather perfect (fearless) love, knowing "perfect" love is "merciful" love (Mt 5:48; Lk 6:36) which is harmless, and merciful is sacrifice empty.

Two "finished"s in John 17 (before the cross) & John 19 (at the cross);
both mentioned in John's "verily, verily" gospel. Human race is won by one first finished.

(i) John 17:4 ("finished" before the cross: hallows God & honors the will of God to have mercy, and not sacrifice)
I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
(ii) John  19:30 ("finished" at the cross: gives place to the devil, and to the resurrection of damnation from the grave)
When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

James 1:15 when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

Note: in a race, only first finished is win, as one who receives the prize for all; Second finished is called place. A second finished in John 19:30 gives "place" to the devil (law), by giving place to sacrifice which is "by the law", and no man is justfied "by the law" in the sight of God. So Paul The Apostle of Grace and Peace says: neither give place to the devil; as if to say neither be right of left/right division, since this sort of grace of law/grace on high is still division, not peace, and still partiality, not perfection. True peace of true perfection is above all the left/right sides wars having side effects to both sides; So we should also leave what's right of left/right division for what's higher of high/higher, since only what's higher is harmless. For when studied out, even what's right of everlasting punishment/life eternal in Matthew 25:46 is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life, but mirrorly the reverse of eternal life, as Christ Jesus is mirrorly the reverse of Jesus Christ. All who will live godly (childish) in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But in Christ of Jesus Christ there is no law, hence no persecution, for only the law persecutes people to the point of suffering.

Peace with God and eternal salvation are notably "through Jesus --> Christ", in that Christ thereof. Christ Jesus is a men and God mediator, and Jesus thereof is the mediator of a new covenant in Sion: heavenly Jerusalem; But God is one, and a mediator is not of one (God): Galatians 3:20. Furthermore a stumblingstone is laid in Sion, city of the living God (fearful in Hebrews 10:31). So our focus should be above and beyond Sion of Sinai/Sion, to where the God of the living is. For this plural God in Sion, when Judge of all, can also be an unjust judge who judges all guilty as hell. So we ought to hear what the unjust judge (law) says: sinners all, none righteous, thereby all perish.

Merciful God above and beyond Sion: that God in heaven "higher than the heavens" is harmless: doesn't law impute trespasses to them or us. That God remains invisible and inaccessible until we embrace abolition of law and let it also be abolition of sacrifice, as sacrifice doesn't purge all things, only "almost all things". Selah to those believing it is finished at the cross. For a resurrection of life from the grave also gives place to resurrection of damnation (law) from the grave, which leaves us in jeopardy of greater damnation and in danger of eternal damnation until we abolish all damnation by let abolition of law be abolition of sacrifice, since sacrifice is what God will not have because it condemns the guiltless: matthew 12:7. So we should lay aside this weight of being resurrected from the grave, which is a "grave" subject to avoid when laying hold on eternal life, which is not life after death, but life void of death. For if we don't lay aside resurrection appearances can be deceiving, we likely won't endure to the end where there is only salvation, not both salvation and destruction; Which is to say we won't likely make it through the best of spam without getting spammed ourself.

Problems with John 19:30 (finished at the cross):
Matthew 9:13: God will have mercy, and not sacrifice (which is not then, not now, not ever)
Matthew 27:46 plural God(s) in the midst of seven last utterances (a little leaven leavens the whole)
Mark 16:14: the crucified and risen Jesus still upbraided (James 1:5 God upbraideth not)
Luke 16:16 the law and the prophets ended with the beheading of John (2nd coming of Elijah)
Luke 23:46 suggests John 19:30 was cried with a loud (law) voice (a loud voice calls from behind)
Galatians 3:12 no man is justified by the law (Hebrews 10:8 sacrifice & offering are by the law)
Galations 3: 13: Cursed every one that hangeth on a tree (John 19:30 tends to law curse every one)
Hebrews 9:22 blood shed (sacrifice) only purges almost all things, not all things
Hebrews 10:36: Do the will of God first precedes receive the promise after it's done.
Hebrews 11:13,39 Those who didn't do the will of God died and received not the promise.
James 1:15: sin (law), when "it is finished", brings forth death (not life). Our goal is life, not death.
Revelation: an 'arnion' Lamb (not of God) bites and smites with a curse (law)

Example: Saul's Zeal for Law becomes Paul's Zeal for Grace
Saul of Tarsus: was zealously on fire for the law, more than peers
Paul The Apostle: was zealously on fire for grace, more than peers
So keep the zeal (fire) but change it from destructive to constructive.

Hebrews 12, which speaks of wherefore seeing (of blind vs seeing faiths)... wherefore "seeing"
    - seeing that playing the blame game inducts both sides into a hall of shame as the side effect
    - seeing that all perish by the using of ordinances, but that none perish by grace void of law
let us run (of walk/run) the human race of life or death to all that is set before us. Hebrews 12:29 also concludes with revealing what our God is (of their God: law -vs- our God: grace) : Our God is a "consuming fire". So we have allegoric parts zealously being played out in a shew, for the comparison of two fires (zeals): law fire (zeal) and grace fire (zeal); the passion of each fire (zeal) respectively being destruction and construction; Law fire zealously tearing people down by accusation and condemnation to discomfort, and grace fire zealously building people up by edification and exhortation to comfort: grace fire (passion, zeal) being the only constructive one of destructive and constructive fires. What constructive grace fire consumes is law: sin & death, by bringing things of darkness into the light, so they may be seen as destructive things to put away. So it is written the only wise God our Saviour will have all men saved and fully aware what from: Law, which was God our Destroyer when our tongue was set on fire of hell (law).

Grace fire (zeal) consumes law: sin imputation and death sting thereof, and with a passion by bringing such law things into the light. The real passion of "Christ is the end of the law", not getting beaten both back and front as Mel Gibson's bloody movie portrayed. So it is written that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, and by NOT law imputing trespasses unto them. Our passion (zeal, fire) should be likewise, for Grace will have Mercy, which is what multiplies Peace.