Twain: This/That Twain Shew (even Twain Gods)

  Dare to Compare these | A - B | Biblical Allegory things of Twain Shew Page 1:

Two Adams are compared in 1Corinthians 15:45 as first man Adam and last Adam; But in 2Corinthians 10:12 it's not wise (but foolish) to compare Adam1(soul) vs Adam2(spirit), and in if told compare spirit-u-all vs spirit-u-all, which is to say compare Adam2(law) vs Christ(grace). For Hebrews 4:12 has two dividing asunders in order to get the heart of the matter, as if first wrongly dividing the word of truth (law vs law) and then rightly dividing the word of truth (laws vs grace). things divided against itself nor wise to mix first and last = oxymoron. First/last Adams (thems) are therein contrasted as soul/spirit, also as natural/spiritual man, as if before/after; But notably also as first/second, and clarified as earthly/heavenly "image"s, leaving us with an allegoric mystery to sort out. For in Hebrews 4:12 the dividing asunder of soul<-->spirit is only the first of two dividing asunders required to get to the heart of the matter: If your heart is not established "with" grace (Hebrews 13:9), then Matthew 12:30-37's either or list clarifies it is "against"; And Romans 8:2's Law1 vs Law2 of 1Corinthians 15:45's Adam1 vs Adam2, which is also like Hebrews 10:39's Them1 vs Them2, are all notably divided "against" itself, will notably defile(condemn) itself with it's own mouth from the heart (Mark 7:18-23); And thereby end up in a hall of shame rather than fame, for playing the childish blame game. For whether it be playing their part or your part, it's still part-iality and not perfect-ion. For 1Corinthians 13:10 notes when perfect-ion is come, then part-iality is done away. Furthermore, it's revealed in 2Corinthians 10:12 that comparing  Them1 vs Them2 (Law1 vs Law2, Adam1 vs Adam2) is not wise: not a wise comparison, but a foolish comparison of children vs children and of servants vs servants who are carnally divided against themselves, or "oppose themselves" as it says in 2Timothy 2:25; Which is common and commonly called bi-polar dis-order, or PTSD, or preposterous order (teaching first and learning after) by Translators of the Bible.

In 1st Adam ("natural"man): "all" die; evidently from a bad case of grace + law = life + death = a dead end. In last Adam ("spiritual" man) is a question: shall all be made alive? The correct answer is Yes! Reason: if not "all", then none at all; For "there is no respect of persons with God", nor with Son of God. So you too can have partiality with impartial God is an oxymoronic (for morons) lie witch many churches and their leaders thereof preach as deceivers (ministers of Satan = Law). Such ministers (both religious & political) are both good + evil, for law is both good + evil; But Hebrews 5's conclusion exhorts us to use our senses to "discern(avoid) both good + evil". If it looks a bit(a little leaven leaveneth the whole) Fishy(like the license plates on many carnal cars), sounds like Horeb-bull, smells Pewy, tastes Bitter-sweet (Col 2:21), and feels like hell when even "tasted"(Heb 6:4), or worse: swallowed, then it's law: both good + evil, witch ends bad.

             Seldom Asked Question posed: "even so in Christ shall all be made alive"?
First Adam "was" a "living soul", last Adam "is" a "quickening spirit"; the allegorical difference being mortal/immortal & corruptible/incorruptible, is also the difference between grace + law / grace: this before was: "earthy", that after is: "heavenly"; similar to ye/you are before/after in 1Peter 5:10.

Mirrorly speaking (wherein left changed to right): as we have borne the image of this one man (1st Adam) we shall also bear the "express image"(Heb 1) of that one man (last Adam): the change being from glory to glory (law to grace): 2Cor 3; from  (blind) faith to (seeing) faith (is "better"); and mtn to mtn. The second (of first/second) is: the Lord (of Lords) from heaven: "that" of this/that. For two contrary things cannot coexist, not in peace, so he taketh away the first to establish the second. He is our "peace" who hath abolished the law(enmity) from his flesh (we are his flesh): Ephesians 2 (Eph 5)... concurs with Col 2's mention of ordinances(law) being blotted out.

See also the one man vs one man Twain Shew in Romans 5:12-21. By this: "one man" (Moses) came the law: death upon all; Also by that: "one man" (that Jesus Christ is come: 1Jn4) came grace: life upon all (Jn 1:17 compares law vs grace as lie vs truth via Moses vs Jesus Christ). One man had a dead end (grace + law = life + death), the other man is alive unto God (who knew grace is "sufficient" = no law req'd). The moral of such a twain compare-i-son is also "evident" from the evidence "that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, [it is] evident": Gal 3.

Genesis: twain before/after options for "Let us make man": i) "in our image" ii) "after our likeness", twain options given as a Before/After Shew; But therein such "let us make man" God also declared the end from the beginning (Is 46:10), as he did by first saying "let there be light" (not darkness, nor both light + darkness = both good + evil). One "man" kind is to be "made" (not created) by "us" (not them, neither of them vs them, for there's never any consensus among carnal folk). Such is the "man" kind (of child/man) to whom the Lord will not impute sin: Rom 4:8; the better blessed of twain blesseds compared herein.

Allegoric Moral: God's choice of twain a right hand man, as what's "right" (of left/right) and "with" (of against/with) God. But when considering three things, it's leave the principles(twain) for best of good better best. So even them being narrow minded (doubleminded: unstable, highminded: unholy) of twain broad/narrow ways should also leave their narrow minded way for "a more excellent way" of three ways. For the narrow way (of broad/narrow ways) isn't life, but rather only "leadeth unto life" by "go on unto perfection". So albeit one of twain is the better of good/better, but it's only better for some. What's best of three things is best for all.

Of Twain Adams, the 1st (Old Testament) was about plural "generations" of Adam (Genesis 5), but the 2nd (New Testament) is about the singular "generation" of Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:1), allegorically plural vs singular, grace + law vs grace. Grace is sufficient, and winner take all. For by law none enter, but via His Grace it's y'all come. Hence Paul, "apostle of JC by the will of God" and also "his witness unto all men", states what's "evident" from all the evidence to Galatians, which is allegory say they were the better of law/law rather than the best of (law/law)->grace. Law vs grace: "contrary things" should not be mixed. Contrary things mixed = an oxymoron: "one proselyte" that's "twofold": more the CHILD of hell is an example of an adult-oxymoron. Many adults "such like" oft pride them-selves in being "children of God" rather than man kind.

Two Adams are also compared in 1Timothy, but not easily seen. 1Tim 2:13 is about 1st Adam, "them" = male + female = "Adam" in Gen 5:2 ...this woman (church), being deceived, was in the transgression = in the law (for "where no law there no transgression": Rom 4:15), and such is a "great" mystery (of great/greater things). But as it states, 2nd Adam was not deceived, for Paul says he speaks of Christ (the end of the law: Romans 10:4) and the Church (neither Christ nor the Church being deceived or in the transgression = law), whereas the woman (church) of 1st Adam was deceived. It's "allegory": Galatians 4, and "mystery"(noted over 20 times in the NT), so allegoric mystery(to solve) about law vs grace (lie vs truth); And only "know"-ing the truth makes you free of "believe"-ing the lie; For devils "believe": James 2:19.

As in Adam "all" die, even so in Christ shall "all" be made alive. For God hath concluded them "all" in unbelief that he might have mercy upon (us) "all". So Two Alls; Yet we can't have both all die and all live = an oxymoron, nor all in unbelief and mercy on all, for such a contradiction is also called an oxymoron. Not to mention a contradiction (them vs them) is "of sinners": Hebrews 12:3.

Pick one all. Either way of ways it's "all" (not some only). In the God Shew we have two alls as if it's all (them) in first Adam, then all (us) in last Adam: Before vs After. Two Alls, but mirrorly for the sake of the Shew, to help distinguish what JC said about two ways lead to two ends: to destruction (of all) or to life (of all)... the first being a dinosaur end: extinction (Genesis 2:1), the latter end better being all live happily ever after in Christ: "the end of the law". He taketh away the first(Law: all die) to establish the second(Grace: all live).

When looking closer at, giving "more earnest heed" to, what's notably "written aforetime for our learning": Rom 15:4, one all is them, and the other all is us: first "them" are "created" (imperfect), then "us" are "made" (perfect). For God said let "us" make "man" (Genesis 1), one man(singular) of two one man scenarios in Romans 5; the second man kind thereof allegorically being "us":

• God hath provided some better thing for us (Heb 11).
• The word of reconciliation is committed to us (2Cor 5).
• God hath given us the victory through J->C (1Cor 15).
• God hath not appointed us unto wrath (1Thess 5:9).
• God hath not given us the spirit of fear (2Tim 1).
• The is not slack... but long-suffering to us-ward (2Pet 3)
  

But when they say Peace & Safety (Law & Order) then sudden destruction cometh upon "them" (1Thessalonians 5:3). It reasons a them/us shew is an allegory about law/grace: as if before/after, this/that, created/made, imperfect/perfect.

The first part by itself, them without us, results in failure: Rom 9:31 whereby all die, a bad ending. Begin again: ye (do err) must be born again. We shall not all sleep (die), rather we shall be "chanGed" (1Cor 15). In fact we "all" are changed from (law)glory to (grace)glory (from them to us) as by the Spirit (2Cor 3). So changed in 2Corinthians 3 is  past tense, as is perfected in Hebrews 10; So changed is already done. But what remaineth is the global awareness of it. For if any did add "law worketh wrath" unto "grace is sufficient", it would kill "all"; as Paul notes in Colossians 2:20-22 by the using of ordinances "all" perish, and James 1:15 notes sin(law), when "it is finished", brings forth "death" (not life). So thank God it's only a shew, and where sin(law) abounds grace much more.

Time itself changed from <-BC to AD->. It's now forward-> unto "us-ward", unto "perfection", so "none perish" (2Pet 3), the one all: "us": who all die to the law (not by the law), so all become alive unto God, approved unto God. For the host of "them" first "finished" in Genesis 2  (not first of two "finished"s in John) is notably after the sixth day and prior to the seventh day in Gen 2:1 (which is no place at all, which is what place we are to give to devilish law). Law being finished is an end mirrorly imagined by "them". For the God shew doesn't end badly for anyone. "Jesus" said: "it is finished", but (also) "the end is not yet": not if you're hearing of wars and rumors of wars, such as the "war" cry of the salvation army and the warfare of silly women (churches) still unaware "he(Christ: the end of the law[Rom 10:4]) is our peace (already)": Ephesians 2; And the $illy war in Iraq spawned by G.W.Bush, who said (at his second coming as POTUS) he would take his (rod of iron) rule of law global in four years; But the Bible says different: "whether prophecies, they shall fail": 1Cor 13:8. Not to mention "the end" of the shew, shewdown thereof, is already Pauline written:

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

A look at the word "Amen" in the Bible reveals the first instance is a doubleminded "Amen, amen" to be spoken by the "woman"(allegory: church), and to being both blessed + cursed = "accursed" by her priest in Numbers 5:22. The next twelve "Amen"s are by all the people to being cursed. Again in Nehemiah 8:6 is a double "Amen, Amen" of all the people to the reading of Mosaic law; notably with faces to the ground and weeping about such law law.

Hebrews, a mini bible itself, has two Amens, with the last Amen going to "Grace with you all", which is the "token" in every Pauline Epistle written by the hand of Paul himself (thrice noted) no matter who else pens the Pauline oration, which is further noted in the <end notes> of his epsitles, whcih help us figure out which of the Pauline Epistles is "the epsitle from Laodecia". Go figure.

Romans, a seven course meal by having seven "Amen"s, also has the last Amen of seven (the seventh of seven) going to the last trump: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen. In Hebrews 7:26 an high priest became seven things, 7th of 7 being "higher than the heavens". Born again also has seven criteria, the seventh of seven being "incorruptible". So the HOLY BIBLE is also the seventh of seven Bibles made better from six good.

Double Amen? Since grace "is", law was "added", and "the curse" is "of the law", then it reasons such doubleminded grace(is) + law(added) is as blessed + cursed = "accursed", as noted in Galatians 1:9. James 1:8 states a doubleminded man is "unstable" in all his ways, and James 3:10 notes blessing + cursing coming out the same (Jesus Christ is "the same": Hebrews 13) mouth "out not so to be" (should not even be said, let alone given any amen, witch is as if saying yea to a dead end).

Perhaps in saying "Moses, Moses" (Exodus 3) God in the midst was revealing Moses was double minded, unstable; For grace and law are "contrary things" which cannot coexist, not in peace. Rather he is our peace who abolished the law, ending all law vs law and laws vs grace divisions. In the case of Moses we find him located in the hALL of shame of Hebrews 11, among those who "all died" and "received not the promise" = bad ending of grace + law, which is as saved + destroyed afterward in Jude 1:5. And looking at the evidence, it seems Abraham was also called "Abraham, Abraham" when about to sacrifice(slaughter, kill, butcher) his own son (not merciful), and had to be stopped. There seem to be many instances of a double minded man in the Bible, including "Saul, Saul" who became Paul The Apostle: "his witness unto all men", and writes the majority of the NT.

The last "Amen" concluding the Holy Bible is notably a singular "Amen" to the "grace"(only) of "our" Lord "Jesus Christ" being "with" you all in Revelation 22:21 (the "last trump" it). Because of what such "Amen" goes to: "Grace with you all" makes it an alls well that ends well last will and testament; Which essentially makes all the previous amens to erroneous things null and void, similar to how any last will and testament makes the previous one null and void. For when the will of God: I will have mercy, and not sacrifice) is probated, then we'll see "the end" that God declared "from the beginning": "let there be light"(allegory: grace glory, "understanding": Proverbs 4). So the biblical objective is to get understanding to the point there is no misunderstanding in the body.

Amen to grace & law, blessed & cursed does occur in Revelation 1: 7, 8; followed by seven more amens in Revelation 1:18; 3:14; 5:14; 7:12: 19:4; 22:20; 22:21, the last being a singular "Amen" to JC "grace"(only) being with you all, against none. So there is no mention of any law whatsoever to anyone whomsoever, in what the last Amen goes to, the end of law. Where no law, there no transgression (Rom 4:15); When  no law, no sin imputed (Rom 5:13); And concerning the first fruit (Rom 11:16) of the Spirit: "love"... against such there is "no law" (Gal 5).  If only our bewitched churches would charity (no law) one another, and close their services with one last "Amen" to His grace, the world would be as one God is: grace us, mercy full, peace full; rather than being law law.

Antioch1: Syria: Saul (Acts 11): Law: Good + Evil; so first called (plural) "Christians" at Antioch1
Antioch2: Pisidia: Paul (Acts 13): Grace: Good only; so not a "proselyte" like Nicolas of Antioch1

Notice terror-ist Saul among prophets didn't become grace-us Paul THE APOSTLE until Acts 13;
For at Antioch1, where they were first called Christians (plural), they were notably still the likes of:
- terror-ist Saul: Acts 11, did not become Paul (his witness unto all men) until later on in Acts 13
- dissimulating unconverted Peter, 1st called Satan (Mt 16), also told he'd get converted (Lk 22)
- carried away Barnabas, their (law vs law) mediator (a mediator is not of one [God]; Galatians 3)
In the same manner plural "Christians" (at Antioch1) still have shame, due to playing blame games.
But converted Peter, who dissimulated at Antioch1, later says a singular "Christian" has no shame.
Moral is: be not Double-minded like Jesus (law: good + evil), but Christ minded (grace: good only).
Go on from 2 Sons Jesus brought division = not peace, to 1 Son Christ is our peace = not divided.
God saw good only x7: Genesis 1. His Christ is the head of every man (not of children vs children).

Note: first mention of Antioch is Acts 6, where seven are multitude chosen to serve tables (laws):
1. Stephen, full of Holy Ghost (Law: martyr-dumb will have sacrifice, authored by divisional Jesus)
2. Philip
3. Prochorus
4. Nicanor
5. Timon
6. Parneas
7. Nicolas, a proselyte of Antioch (Nicolaitans hated in Revelation 2; so obviously of Antioch1)
So, of this seven, all seven are leavened by the first and the last. Selah to Alpha + Omega TM.
So when 120 multitude chose Mathias by lot (voting = elect), God chose Saul to become Paul.
For the old twelve Jesus chose were a hung jury, and because one of this twelve was a devil;
And the new twelve were still a dirty dozen, and because of James, Peter, John: three top dogs.
For we are told Judas "also" betrayed him, and Peter betrayed him thrice, perhaps twice. Selah.
Paul also names three top dogs to beware, since they obviously bewitched "churches" of Galatia.

Point: plural "Christians" of plural "churches" allegory denotes "double-minded" = all ways unstable.

Antioch 1 (now Antakia): Syria: Saul: In Syria, on the river Orontes, about 16 miles from the Mediterranean, and some 300 miles north of Jerusalem. It was the metropolis of Syria, and afterwards became the capital of the Roman province of Asia. It ranked third, after Rome and Alexandria, in importance, of the cities of the Roman empire. It was called the "first city of the East", similar to how Ephesus was port of first landing to enter Asia. Legalistic Christianity was early introduced into this Antioch (Acts 11:19, 21, 24), and the name "Christians" (notably plural) was first applied here to its professors (Acts 11:26). It is intimately connected with the early history of the gospel (Acts 6:5; 11:19, 27, 28, 30; 12:25; 15:22-35; Gal. 2:11, 12). It was the great central point whence missionaries to the Gentiles were sent forth from double-minded Jerusalem Jerusalem. It was the birth-place of famous Christian father Chrysostom, who died A.D. 407. It bears the modern name of Antakia, and is now a miserable, decaying Turkish town. Like Philippi, it was raised to the rank of a Roman colony. Such colonies were ruled by "praetors" (R.V. marg., Acts 16:20, 21).



Antioch 2 (now Yalobatch): Pisidia: Paul: In the extreme north of Pisidia; that Anticoh was visited by Paul and Barnabas on the first missionary journey (Acts 13:14). Here they found a synagogue and many proselytes. They met with much success in preaching the gospel, but the Jews there stirred up a violent opposition against grace and truth, so Paul was obliged to leave the place, and go on. On his return trip, Paul again visited that Antioch for the purpose of confirming the disciples (Acts 14:21). It has been identified with the modern Yalobatch, lying to the east of Ephesus.

 

See Also discussion of Two Ascensions at Easter Page

In Revelation 13 we have two beast(s) as two coming(s), first an up rising out of the sea, secondly coming up out of the earth; the second another up rising of law (that JC told to go, jump in the [dead] sea), and as the thief witch cometh not, but for to steal, kill, & destroy.

See web page: Law <= Law: Two laws in Romans 8:2 are as two beasts in Revelation 13. Pauline Clarity of Pauline Clarity: even the better of such law law no more voids death sting of sin than a law of aerodynamics voids a law of gravity. Converted Peter concurs: being sow dog gone law law results in a latter end worse.

And the blasphemous name on all seven heads is law; for only law spake "against" us (Col 2), and "yet is" against us, but such "strength of sin", such troll toll is dwindling as awareness arises. Our only problem is such a "was, and is not" beast [law] "was, but is not, yet is" because many are still being sow dog gone law law: deceived by many who come in the name of God & Son with their evangelastic oxymorons (only for morons) such as: you too can have partiality from an impartial God; you too can be sow dog gone law law you'll say a dblemindead "Amen, amen" to being blessed + cursed = accursed by priestly grace + law of ministers of Satan(Law) who use law to impute sin for the hell of it, go about accusing and excusing, playing the childish blame game witch inducts all in the hALL of shame (you cannot excuse yourself from "we all are one", "there is no respect of persons with God", "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump").

Evidently, from Jam 3, such other wise is neither from above nor firstly pure; But earthy, sensual, devilish. It's time we let such PEW, so old (stale dated)  it's ready to vanish (Heb 8:13) and shall vanish (1Cor 13:8); let beastial law be what it's supposed to be: a dead testator.

Romans 4:6,7 (Ps 32:1,2): blesseds compared as law/grace, child/man, good/better, them/us:
(i)   blessed "they" whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered
(ii)  blessed the "man" to whom the Lord will not impute sin (no law = no sin)

(i) the law [and lie] was given by Moses ... Jn 1:17 compares law vs grace
(ii) but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ ... as if comparing lie vs truth

"He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second": Hebrews 10:9
(Not establish a second law of law vs law; Rather establish His Grace of Law vs Grace)

The first blessed is good + evil law, sin conscious, and notably a cover up. When uncovered (revelationed) it is faulty, since there is no real or lasting forgiveness in law, because there is no mercy in law (all those who died under Moses' law died "without mercy"). Forgiveness of a grace + law (Lord's) prayer is conditional upon forgiving all men all trespasses (according to Mt 6:15), and forgiveness of the Holy Ghost was a mission impossible, for everyone has, at some time, blasphemed the Ghost (spoke against the law thereof, even if only saying: it isn't fair, as a child) witch is an unpardonable sin, both in this world and the to come. When looking at the safety of what "they say" in 1Thess 5:3, which is what deceivers say in Luke 21:8, it's as the saved + destroyed of those in Jude 5 who believed such Mosaic grace + law. For law imputes sin, and such grace + law makes all sinners, none righteous. None for me thanks, I'll take only pure religion, firstly pure wisdom from above such high-minded law law on high. For the higher exhortation is: mind not high things: Rom 12; be not high-minded: Rom 11 & 1Tim6, and because "high-minded" is listed among "un-holy" things in 2Tim3's "from such turn away".

The second blessed imputes no sin, and such is to the "man" kind of child/man in 1Cor 13:11 (the reason Paul exhorts be no more children); Also some "better" thing God hath provided for "us" (of good/better things for them/us in Heb 11:40); And such is in a "better" testament having a "better" hope of all living happy ever after, after all become aware "the God of all grace" has no law: "in him there is no sin". Amen to that blessed of this/that, which speaks of that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing sin (2Cor 5:19). For that God [is] a Spirit (not a Ghost), and the Lord is now "that Spirit" (2Cor 3:17). In Romans 4:15, after twain blesseds compared, it states: where no law, there no transgression. And in Romans 5:13 it clarifies when no law, sin not imputed. And in Romans 8, it clarifies both where and when no law (condemnation): here and now. Problem is many are still unaware of it.

In Heb 12:24 two bloods speak, for comparison & contrast of good & better things: the blood of sprinkling speaketh "better" things than the blood of Abell, which speaketh vengeance.

In Heb 9:12,13 we find twain bloods, the blood of bulls & goats compared to the blood of Christ. In Heb 10:4 it clarifies it's impossible for the blood of bulls & goats to take away sins, which is to say it's impossible to be forgiven by law witch imputes sin.

Sure, it states in Heb 9 almost all (but not all) things are by the law purged with blood, and without shedding of blood no remission; But it also clarifies in Romans 4 & 5 there is no transgression where no law & no sin imputed to remit when no law; the where and when further clarified in Rom 8:1 as here and now.

In Heb 10 (from Ps 40) it clarifies God took no pleasure, none, in bloodshed or sacrifice or offering "of the law"; For God isn't into bloodshed: He will not have sacrifice (Hos 6; Mt 9), not then, not now, not ever. Consider what a bloody mess we have on our hands due to adding law to grace is "sufficient". The sacrifice required of such life + death of grace + law is a dead end, law being a ministration of death(2Cor3) to all, which that God will not have.

Twain: Two Bodys

In 1Cor 15 a natural body and a spiritual body are compared, as well as celestial bodies and bodies terrestrial having different glorys, celestial glory (grace: Prov 4) being one (not twain). There is a natural body (first Adam, earthy man, disobedient, by which death came upon all: in Adam all die) and a spiritual body (last Adam, heavenly man, obedient, by which resurrection of the dead shall come upon all: even as Christ is raised from the dead). The natural first (in our image), spiritual last (after our likeness), like a before & after one man shew in Rom 5, after like the second blessed in Rom 4: 7,8. First a living soul: corrupt, weak, mortal, sin consciousness and a cover up; Last a quickened spirit, incorrupt, powerful, immortal, uncovered to see no sin. First sown, cast down, as dead. Last raised up, as from the dead.

Fool, that which thou sowest  is not quickened except it die. A fool, Mt 23,  seems to be those who mix grace + law, as sowing life + death, a dead end. Paul says such is not made alive except it die. Elsewhere he clarifies such die daily is dying to the law as if law is spiritual dung. For until one died to law, all had a dead end by law. Paul asks where is the sting of sin: death; answers it's in the law, the strength of sin, a "ministration of death" (2Cor 3). Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God (Rom 7)... the first fruit of the Spirit is love; against such there is "no law" (Gal 5).

A "book of life" mentioned in Phil 4:3, and six more times in Revelation for a total of seven, implies the converse, a book of the dead, for comparison. Indeed we find such called the "book of the generations (plural) of Adam" in Gen 5, and for comparison the "book of the generation (singular) of Jesus Christ" in Mt 1.

Allegorically such indicates the book of life isn't about grace + law, nor any dblemindead "Amen, amen" to being blessed + cursed as the woman (church) was when both blessed + cursed by her priest. Rather a book of life is one thing: a singular "Amen" to His grace, which is sufficient and concludes the Holy Bible to make it a book of life instead of life + death which is a dead end. And near the end, in Revelation 22, we find if any "man" (better blessed and second part of child/man in Rom 4:8 and 1Cor 13:11) shall take away from the words (plural) of the book of "this" prophecy (of this/that), such as taking away the word death from death/life; then God shall take away his part (child part of child/man, law part of law/grace, death part of such life + death, out of the book of life.

A study of jewish festivals, specifically fall festivals, specifically Rosh haShanah (also called Yom Teruah, Feast of Trumpets, Head of the year, Day no man knows, etc), reveals a saying among jewish people at Rosh haShanah: "may you be inscribed in the book of life". During this time it was commonly believed the books (mentioned in Daniel 7:10 & Rev 20:12) were opened to judge, the book of life being thought to be the book of the (wholly) righteous; such not being righteous in themselves but having accepted His righteousness (Is 64:6 self righteous being as filthy menstral rags compared to God's righteousness).

The problem with perceiving more than one book is it tends to produce night visions like Daniel had; allegorically night mares, four of such mares in Rev 6, the last of such having a rider who sat upon it named Death. Let's take heed that even though the HOLY BIBLE containing Old & New Testaments speaks of books, even Holies, it's not a HOLY HOLY BIBLE, rather a HOLY BIBLE. It's one book, having one conclusion: "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all". A singular "Amen" to that of this/that makes both it and you all holy.