Prophecies Shall Fail - Holy Kiss Not Ass Kissing - ShewBread Page 4

His Angel plays the Last Trump it

Whether prophecies, they shall fail (vanish)

No fail-u-are at all in Charity Never Faileth
Nor any forsaken in Grace Never Forsakes
Holy Kiss (Not Ass Kissing) Explained
Freedom  From  Fear Hath Torment


ShewBread Page 4: Index of ShewBread Topics Click Here

Related GodShew.Org Web Pages
Shew  -  TwainShew: 2 things  -  GodShew: 3 things - Greatest of three things


INDEX OF TOPICS FOR SHEWBREAD PAGE 4

Prophecies shall fail:
Whether prophecies, they shall fail. Prophecies for Nineveh failed. Revelation prophecies shall fail.
Holy Kiss Explained - Holy Kiss is not ass kissing someone above you on some ladder to one of two heavens on high.
Freedom from Fear Hath Torment - Fear is becoming a global epidemic, pandemic, tormenting many still unaware law is the strength of sin (root cause of it), and the sting of sin is death (to all). So law is the bottom of the terror barrel, source of fear hath torment. So freedom from fear hath torment is via flush law as dung to gain Christ is the end of the law.
Grace unto you, and peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ


 Prophecy -vs-  Prophesy
Gloomed
(Destruction) vs Groomed (Construction)
Which is witch? Lie vs Truth: which will you believe?
Why believe if the objective is not believe, but know.

I find it sad that literate, educated, and churched adult Christians have been actively $upporting various activities in Israel and elsewhere, thinking to help Old Testament prophecies come true, when it clearly says such prophecies(plural: grace + law) shall fail: "Charity never faileth; but whether prophecies, they shall fail (1Cor 13:8).

So prophesy (not prophecy) unto men, for "prophesy" and "prophesyings" speak of edification exhortation "comfort" (not discomfort); whereas "prophecy" and "prophecies" tend to speak of and bring discomfort rather than comfort; the difference being as the difference between law and grace, sacrifice and mercy, division and peace, death and life, fear and perfect love void of fear, etc.

Charity edifieth, and not only itself, but the whole church. And to pass the holiness with sobriety test you need "charity never faileth" a test; not to mention the pass mark is 100% since "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump" and a heaven body such as the body of Christ doesn't want even one cancerous law cell. So despise not prophesy-ings, they lead to eternal comfort.

To understand what meaneth such we need the content & context of the chapter, which also speaks about parts (plural), imperfect & perfect, before & after; also about the first part being done away when the second part is come. And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to perceive Paul , writer of more than half the New Testament, is always talking about law & grace, rather law or grace as did Jesus divide the twain and then rightly divided which is witch, abolishing the witch of twain. In the same chapter he goes on to compare such twain things as child-ish & man-ly (immature & mature), darkness & light, unknown & known (ignorance & awareness). And when he refers to prophecies (plural) shall fail, he is allegorically referring to any prophetic mixture of grace + law shall fail:

as it did for all Nineveh in the book of Jonah ;
as it did for all those who failed to attain righteousness in Rom 9:31 ;
as it did for all those saved out of Egypt in Jude 5 (via grace + law = saved + destroyed) ;
as it did for all those who died and rec'd not the promise in Heb 11: 13,29 ;
as it did for all those Melchisedec type priests in Heb 7:23 ;
as it did for all them God concluded in unbelief in Rom 11; 32 ;
as it shall for all ministers of Satan in 2Cor 11: 15
 
I also find it sad concerning televangelists, such as Jack of the Impe family on JVI Presents, a Jack in the box who keeps popping up, claiming to have studied the Bible so l-o-n-g (especially concerning prophecy), boasting of many years ministering deceit via Lk 21:8 on national tv, and constantly saying he wants to vanish ... sad that thinking people watching such like (2Cor 11:15) are not actually more helpful in helping them who want to vanish, to vanish, by simply pressing a (change the channel) button on their remote. I'm not so inconsiderate of the wishes of such like. I help all them ye do err folk get their wish to vanish(rapture): click!

It is my opinion people get confused about prophecies by not knowing the Scriptures are written as Scripture -vs- Scripture, and written as such aforetime for our learning; which is probably also why many jewish biblical scholars are still having difficulty sorting out their expectations of a Messiah, since in one place it suggests a nice guy coming, and another place a son of a bitch is coming.

And protestant christains are the worst for mis quoting Bible verses, or having preconceived notions about such from ministers of the 2Cor 11: 14, 15 sort, which read something into such which is not there. For example many christians say and think all Scriptures (plural) apply when referring to 2Tim 3: 16, which says: "All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness". All scriptures, if erroneously thought to be the inspired word of God, would make God out to be a schizoid oxymoron, for many scriptures are contradictory and beastial cruel. The objective of such is to sort out which is witch, and know what that God is.

It was a mystery for sure, since it flat out says so; and even a "great mystery" as Paul clarifies in the end of Eph 5. But he also clarifies: "This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church" (Eph 5:31). Such compares this (Adam) and that (Adam), two different Adams and two different bodies of such heads, such lords. But concerning the will of God , the mystery of his will is "made known" unto "us" (Eph 1:9), and because the word of reconciliation is given unto "us" (2Cor 5:19), that they without "us" should not be made perfect (Heb 11: conclusion).

Concerning the prophecy (prophecies) of Revelation, they shall fail; for as it states in Rev 19:10 the testimony of "Jesus" (not Christ) is the spirit of "prophecy" (not prophesy), allegorically denoting prophecies having both spirit & letter (grace & law) are not of God nor of the Christ of Jesus Christ, but as perversion, a perverted mixture of grace + law, which is as spirit + letter, even as prophesy and prophecy, and as blessing + cursing, which is as the perverted mixture of  life + death = dead end. The Holy Bible has no such dead end, and because it has no mention of law at the end, only mention of grace, His grace with you all.

Such is not of the "living" God; not the God of all grace; not that God; but rather imaginations contrary to the knowledge of God which oughta be cast down lest they torment with fear. God hath not given "us" the spirit of fear. God hath not appoined "us" unto wrath. God hath provided some better thing for "us". God hath given "us" the victory through Jesus Christ. He will raise " us " up on the third day (Hos 6, where the will of God is also clarified). The Lord is not slack, but l-o-n-g-suffering to "us-ward", not willing that any should perish (2Pet 3:9) ...

None shall perish, for prophecies shall fail, especially when we believe God as Nineveh did, and realize abolition of the law (Eph 2:15) is as to say: it never happened, can't really happen, because the will of God immutable x 2. In fact: it was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be (Mt 24: 21). It was a phantom menace: only a shadow of good things to come, not the very image of the things (Heb 10:1); and given only as a counter part in a shew , to shew what if anyone added law to grace is sufficient, such would be as life + death, a dead end, for all; as it was for all them in the first part of the shew. But not for us.

We shall not all sleep. Rather we shall all be changed (1Cor 15:51), are changed (2Cor 3:18) from glory to glory (faith to faith: Rom 1). Many are not aware of it, still raising old glory thinking BC a great place; and it was great, but in comparison to a greater look at greatest , it's as nothing at all (2Cor 3). And when looking closer, the law was actually great terror, and by such Moses was a terrorist (Dt 34:12).

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Holy Kiss of Charity is not Ass Kissing nor being Ass Kissed

The Holy Kiss is mentioned four times by Paul in four Pauline Epistles:

- Salute one another with an holy kiss. Romans 16:16
- Greet ye one another with an holy kiss. 1Corinthians 16:20
- Greet one another with an holy kiss. 2Corinthians 13:12
- Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss. 1Thessalonians 5:26

Paul  mentions the holy kiss as greet x3: thrice,
but only mentions holy kiss as salute x1: last trump,
and perhaps as God declared the end from the beginning;
for a holy kiss salutation (token) occurs at the end of pauline epistles.

Peter mentions kiss of charity, but clarifies it as a greet-ing:
Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. 1Peter 5:14
(Such is not ass kissing sheeple ye might meet and greet)

But what's an holy kiss, or kiss of charity? Let's begin with what it's not, since biblical order is before / after, as what not to be / to be; where the first is taken away / to establish the second, and the old is put off / to put on the new, as a child / man puts away childish things: 1Cor 13. So, 1st of  7 criteria for born / born again is be child / man to blind / see the kingdom of God. Holy Kiss is not Ass Kissing nor being Ass Kissed.

Holy kiss is probably not ass kissing someone above you on a ladder to heaven which dead ends short of enter; if there is no respect of persons with God. Holy kiss is probably not kissing some popish ring.; which the late great Kathryn Kuhlman did and died shortly thereafter. Holy kiss is probably not a double cheek jesture, if being double minded is all ways unstable. Holy kiss is probably not even a physical kiss to forehead, cheek, lips, or hand, if biblical order is natural first / spiritual afterward. Yet afterward is not against of with / against; So let us not mirrorly reverse this / that, to that / this, lest it end badly: this body of death.

Holy kiss is probably what Paul says it is, firstly a holy greeting, and lastly a holy salutation, unto brethren. Paul clarifies both sanctifier and sanctified all of one, brethren all: Hebrews 2:11 Paul greets all brethren as such, even those he's ripping a new asshole for getting bewitched, such as "brethren" of the churches of Galatia, and those who did the bewitching, such as the Hebrews. In fact he refers to the Hebrews as "holy brethren", and salutes them accordingly: "Grace with you all. Amen". But he doesn't use the greeting in Hebrews because it is written as a mini bible itself, beginning with spake <--GOD-->spoke, but it also ends with law / grace.

The biblical concept of an holy kiss is unique to only one New Testament writer: Paul, who writes more New Testament than all six other New Testatment writers combined. Prior to his conversion from extreme legalism to extreme grace, Saul of Tarsus greeted some brethren with holier than thou contempt and hatred. But when he put away childish things he firstly greeted and lastly saluted all brethren with grace. But there's two sorts of holy kiss, two sorts of grace. Such are used to sandwich discussion in epistles between a force field of grace and grace, as if quarantined analysis of deadly law. The Pauline Epistle Format is similar to the standard format of head, body, foot used for writing letters, but a Pauline epistle is not a letter killeth (2Cor 3).

Head: Greeting: Holy Kiss 1: Grace unto you...
Body: Epistle discussion: grow in  law / grace
Foot: Salutation: Holy Kiss 2: Grace with you all

Holy kiss 1: Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Body: of Christ is the end of law, to end law vs law and laws vs grace divisions =  peace
Holy kiss 2: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Paul also clarifies thrice the salutation (last trump) is written by his own hand:
(i) The salutation of [me] Paul with mine own hand. 1Corinthians 16:21
(ii) The salutation by the hand of me Paul. Colossians 4:18
(iii) The salutation of Paul with mine own hand,
      which is the token in every epistle: 2Thessalonians 3:17
So, no matter who pens his apostolic orations, notably called epistles and not letters killeth, Paul himself pens the saluation (token) as his signature, to sign-ify that it's a Pauline Epistle, which means both Hebrews and Revelation are Pauline Epistles, by virtue of the token ending, notably being in every Pauline Epistle, but notably not written with (plural) hands (as it's fearful to fall into hands), rather with hand, notably the hand of Paul, thereby plays the "last trump" in every Pauline epistle, but the last "Amen" being in Revelation only, to end the shew properly.

So the salute, salutation, token, is at the end. But such is more than extending a right to right (cross over) hand shake many hypocrites do. Rather it is hallowed be thy name "grace" unto brethren all, as love unfeigned out of a pure heart, regardless of any temporal controversy.

Looking at Paul 's epistles we find a standard Pauline format used
(i) Greeting: holy kiss 1 (holy kiss of charity)
(ii) Discussion: sandwiched between holy kiss 1 and holy kiss 2
(iii) Salutation: holy kiss 2

But such is "much more" than
(i) Dear Sir
(ii) bla bla black sheep
(iii) Yours Truly

(i)   Greeting: "Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ."
(ii)  Discussion: a comparative teaching of law vs grace; yet as a steward of the mysteries
(iii) Salutation: "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen."  (the last trump)

Greeting: reflects God is not [the author] of confusion (grace + law), but of peace (grace).
Paul's greeting "Grace unto you, and (thereby) peace" is firstly "from God our Father", and notably as "first pure wisdom from above" (James 3: 17), that's first pure (grace), then also firstly peace-able of seven things grace from God is; and as by "the" apostle who is "chosen" of God (Acts 22:14), "an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God ". Paul's discussion, albeit still in allegorical comparative teaching mode, has much clarity, as if to shew you plainly of the Father (John 16:25) which is witch of grace and law, as requested and promised to be revealed; As the God given revelation of Jesus Christ part of the shew, for comparison and contrast with another revelation another prophet saw as another gospel from another Jesus, which was no gospel (good news) at all. So Paul's gospel is notably firstly the gospel of God: grace, and secondly the gospel of Christ: peace. In contrast the gospel of Jesus is division.

Salutation: reflects the token (ticket to heaven) in every epistle is not partial, but with you all.
Paul's salutation, written by his own hand, is the only plausible conclusion to whatever's discussed, as if peace from the Lord Jesus Christ results from grace unto you, and such being from " his witness unto all men ". Also as " his angel ", such is how and by whom the Holy Bible is concluded, as the last trump it played thereby; and thereby we shall not all die, but shall all be (1Cor 15), even are all (2Cor 3) changed, from glory to glory, as by the Spirit, the Spirit of grace: that is with you all, against none. For looking closer at fruit of the Spirit, the first fruit thereof: love, against such (perfect love) there is "no law" (Galatians 5).

Where no law, there no transgression nor any wrath (Romans 4:15). When no law, no sin imputed (Romans 5:13). So where and when no law, there and then no transgression, no wrath, nor any sin or any death sting of sin imputed (1Cor 15), which speaks of no death sting of sin by law (strength of sin's death sting) to anyone. But rather speaks of one dying to the law applies to all in the same manner which dying by the law applied to all. And the where and when of "no law" is clarified in 1Timothy 1:16 and17 as "hereafter" and "now". Hence there's therefore "now" no condemnation (Romans 8:1) here, after law's been  done away (1Cor 13; 2Cor 3), abolished (Eph 2), blotted out (Col 2), taken away (Heb 10), leaving only:

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Holy Kiss of Charity: Grace unto you, and peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.


Freedom of fear "hath torment" (insomnia, worry, anxiety, many sorts of dis-comfort & dis-ease) has been a mission impossible for many, even many christains, among whom it is also reported: fear has become epidemic, to the point of many saying: "I don't feel safe". Why?

The main reason is perhaps a misunderstanding about forgiveness , or a general ignorance of what freedom of fear hath torment is all about. For if unaware "ye are not under law, but under grace", and still adding law to "my grace is sufficient" in ignorance of the folly of such, it gives place to Mt 18:34 in the parable about forgiveness, we could say it gives place to the devil. And the result of ignorance is many are not getting to the root of the matter. And the result of such is many are not feeling safe, which tends for worry, anxiety, and all sorts of secret battles with non disclosed fears among many individuals, even the fear to discuss such with anyone, to arise. And the result of such closure (the opposite of 'disclosure', which is the meaning of revelation) is there's many casualties, much fear hath torment is till tormenting many, even many christians throughout christendom, many of whom are lined up at medical facilities, drugstores, churches, retreats, revivals, bookstores, ever trying and always failing to feel safe, be worry free. Are ye that free? Really free? ... if fear reportedly epidemic, perhaps even pendemic?

An example of some recent disclosure(revelation), or awareness of y(our) "common problem": "fear", "epidemic" fear, epidemic torment thereof, mega co$t added to health care due to sow many adding law to grace is sufficient, is Susan Jeffers book: Feel The Fear And Do It Anyway . Therein she tactfully discloses fear has become epidemic in America, perhaps worldwide, and offers the comfort of knowing you're not alone in such, also encouragment to work through it. Yet she discloses her own ignorance, perhaps her own fear, of not knowing the root cause of sow much fear. Therein she also throws down the gauntlet, for anyone  (else) to (fearlessly dare) disclose (reveal, expose, uncover) the "root" cause of fear. And as if the only one I know of who dares to be a Ghost Buster of such a Phantom Menace, I've taken up her gauntlet. See twain Holy(s) in the Twain Shew for a brief explanation of Ghost busting.

Since 911 took on new meaning for many since twin towers kinda had a Humpty Dumpty, such kinda became synonymous with " is fallen, is fallen "s of Is 21:9 ; Rev 14:8 ; Rev 18:2 ) . And perhaps because some islamic flavored religious fanatics perceived (and perhaps because of their fear, torment thereof, due to their own ignorance of the root cause of fear) such fanatics perhaps perceived such like may have been as great a menace to the world as Babylon II (Rev 14, 16, 17, 18)

It seems, if you'll permit me to be satirically allegorically punny for a moment, islamic fanatics did perceive such to be Babylon II, headead by a war mongering bully: George Bush II, and perhaps somehow connected to poplish John-Paul II; or the bad ending of saved + destroyed in Jude 5. And perhaps it was, for prior to such a "sacrifice" (slaughter), we find popish John-Paul II globe trotting, and on his "eighth" such journey to make one proselyte, was heard (by me) saying: "the l-o-n-g tradition of sacrifice must continue in the third millennium" ... and so it did, and such like is not only contrary to the will of God: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice", and which is immutable x 2 , but also to the will of the Lord in 2Pet 3: 9 ...  that "none perish"; so it is anti-Christ, or anti Christ, the end of the law for righteousness.

But so is what Pres Bush said afterward: "there will be sacrifice"... and his senatorial spokesman for the nation, was heard saying: America is a "nation under law", which is contrary to "ye are not under law, but under grace" of both Romans and Galatians in the Holy Bible. So, America is kinda being like Babylon II, and "is fallen, is fallen" kinda does describe what happened there 9/11/01 in AD; which is kinda like the third day (of AD), or a time when US ought be raised up (Hos 6), not raising up old glory to strike back and even first strike, nor having any Humpty Dumpty fall x 2. What is lacking is awareness and understanding, not only of the leader, but of many ministers and people thereof.
 
Thank God no 'thereafter' in the Bible, only "hereafter" in a before and after allegorical shew , and here we are, after, not realizing contrary things mirrorly for shew. Here we are, after, not daring to compare, thereby not getting understanding (Prov 4:7b) which is witch; the purpose being to "learn" (Rom 14:23) "law worketh wrath" (Rom 4:15) , and God hath not appointed us unto wrath ( 1Thes 5:9 ... or just a few verses beyond 1Thes 5:3; which as much as says God hath not appointed us unto law) , but rather to salvation (freedom) from such "law worketh wrath" and the resulting "fear hath torment" by "our" Lord "Jesus Christ", who said God said: "love one another as I have loved you" (not fear, nor love + fear one another): "be no more children" .

The tricky part of freedom from fear, torment thereof ... which many deceived by many have difficulty getting themselves free of let alone anyone else ... is getting to the root of the matter: a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor an evil tree good fruit (grace doesn't have any law, nor law any grace). We need to get an understanding of the problem prior to offering anyone else our solutions (like many churchy denominations of many churches sow do); For there's one workable solution to y(our) common problem: the law whereby all die: the life + death of grace + law is evidently a dead end.

In plain english: we gotta first bind the "strong man " ( Mt 12:29 ) of any house of sin to spoil it, or else be the one spoiled, like seven sons of Sceva in Acts 19; And the strength (strong man) of sin = the law, and the sting of sin = death (1Cor 15:56) . So we bind law , to loose grace. Or law = press delete; and grace = press save. Or take away the first(law) to establish the second(grace). For grace + law is as mixing contrary things, an oxymoron (only for morons).

For contrary things cannot co-exist in peace; but JC "is our peace" (Eph 2). Go figure, especially in Heb 10, a chapter that explains the go figure of Mt 9:13. And it plainly says in Gal 4 (in answer to SAQ #3 ) what the script-u-are saith, and what the Spirit saith unto the "churches": "cast out the woman and her son", which is allegorical (as explained therein) for cast out the law ( this Agar = Mt Sinai = the law) and the result of the law: sin & death; hence also the "fear" witch "hath torment" of grace + law = life + death = a dead end (the BIGGIE fear: Heb 2:15).

First things first: if it's "dung", flush it and make a clean wipe; then second things second: establish grace. For ya can't establish His grace, unless ya first take away law of grace + law; which JC did by abolishing the law of commandments, or deleting Gen 2: 17 of Gen 2: 16 + 17; which if taken together makes an oxymoron: every tree, but not every tree. Obey one, you disobey the other. Trying to obey both a mission impossible. By deleting the law, of commandments, he effectively took away the transgression (for where no law, there is no transgresssion: Rom 4). And if no transgression, then no need for adding more law; because it was added BECAUSE of the transgression (HELLO).

So, by deleting one law, of commandments, JC effectively deleted all law, including 10 commandments and 613 torah; or as it says in 2Cor 3, everything written in stone and in ink, is to be "done away". Plain and simple, but only if you see it, understand it; else it is really confusing, even law law, and law vs law to have twain laws eventually become LAW<--Law. What many call the law of love(God), love one another to fulfill the law (be ye perfect), is actually the love of law(lie) which fails as often as people get divorced and realtionships fail, so this of this/that compared in Romans 13:9-11. So there's two of everything to sort out, even "be ye perfect" x2 and "love one another" x2, comparing this/that, this/that Gods: Law/Grace.

Be ye perfect: x2 compared:
Law: Be ye perfect: Gen 17:1 is preceded by walk before me... this
Grace: Be ye perfect: Mt 5:48, also merciful: Lk 6:36 is preceded by follow me ... that

Love one another: x2 compared:
Law: Love(Law) one another, to fulfill the law ... this (old)
Grace: Love(Grace) one another, as I have loved you  ... that (new).

Perhaps a re-read of Hebrews would help ministers understand it starts off comparing good and better things as a before and after scenario of time past (BC) and last days (AD) ; then plainly says "leave" such "principles" (plural) of the doctrine of Christ (not leave the doctrine of Christ, which is the doctrine of God) after comparing such twain allegorical things as if before and after, the priesthood of JC being the "after" part, or "after" the order of Melchesedic (witch first ended badly for all such like priests & peoples: infirmity & death, via law of sin & death being added to "my grace is sufficient"). Compare such, then leave it to go on, forward ho, to us-ward, to "perfection" in Hebrews = "Grace with you all. Amen." (Heb 13:25) ... and even on further unto the clarity of Rev 22:21 ... which has no mention of law whatsoever to anyone whosoever, but it does have mention of and clarity about His grace:
  
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all.  Amen.

list of Shewbread topics: ShewBread 1       next page of Shewbread topics ShewBread 5
Shew Shewbread
Jokes
Revelation
Law
BibleTranslators
Hebrews
Sponsor
Founder
Graphs through
Emblems
Annuals
Sermons
Allegory
GraceUntoYou
Us-ward
Readers
Archives
Christmas
Easter
Peace Home