Beware of Dogs: Three Top Dogs: James Peter John

  Thrice Beware: Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision: Philippians 3:2

His angel plays the last trump it

Beware Of Dogs: Three Top Dogs: James Peter John

More zealous Pharisees, like Saul-->Paul, do go on unto perfection; So it is said "beware the leaven" of Pharisees, not the Pharisees. The dog is turned to his own vomit again, so of three top dogs like James Peter John it is said: "beware of dogs", not just their dogma. Philippians 3:2 notably mentions it thrice Beware, beware, beware:
   Beware
of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

Be aware is more excellent than beware; For beware tends to fear.

See More Revelatory Sermons  and  Revelatory Food  and  Revelatory Topics

Holy Kiss: Greeting: Grace unto you, and peace,
from God our  Father and the Lord Jesus  Christ

Philippians 3:2: Beware of Dogs: Three Top Dogs

Beware of Dogs

Three Top Dogs to Beware Beware Beware in Philippians 3:2

James Peter John

It may come as a shock to many who perceive James Peter John as pillars of the faith to find out these three top dogs of the dirty dozen were actually "subverting" souls, and not converting souls. For of Judas Iscariot it's thrice mentioned Judas also betrayed him, thereby noting others betrayed him also. Peter denied him thrice,
before the cock crowed twice. James and John, sons of thunder, asked to sit on his left hand and his right hand; Not knowing scape goats and dumb sheep would be placed at his left and right, and both malefactors would be crucified as thieves. So let's take a look at James Peter John to see what it is about these three top dogs we should beware beware beware: Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision (Philippians 3:2).

There is no respect of persons with God & Son: Matthew 22:16 ...Romans 2:11. No partiality. Yet in four gospel accounts we find apostolic partiality given twelve by two Sons Jesus, who also noted one of the twelve is a devil: John 6:70. In John's account Jesus portrays Judas, son of Simon, as the one who is a devil: John 6:71 & 13:27; But the one Jesus called "Satan" is Peter: Matthew 16:23. John's gospel account is the only account that's "verily verily" of four gospel accounts. Such can allegorically mean double minded: always unstable in James 1; An account wherein John thrice portrays himself as the disciple Jesus loved, but only according to John. Hence we find the Revelation (Uncovering) of St John The Divine revealing when understood it's about uncovering a saint named John (aka Johnny Law) whom many thought to be "the divine". Perhaps those thinking Johnny law is divine should consider law is the ministration of death, not the ministration of life; And there is no respect of persons with law either. By law none enter and all perish: Col 2:20-22.

Of twelve given partiality, we also find in Matthew 17, Mark 9, Luke 8, and Luke 9 there were three top dogs given even more particular partiality. James Peter John were the only three disciples allowed into a ruler of the synagogue's house where the maid's spirit came again to her.
In the case of the maid, if her spirit were grace, it would have never left nor forsaken her. James Peter John were the only three taken to an high mountain apart where Jesus was transfigured, notably after six days.  In the case of transfigured after six days, we find law giver Moses and Elias (aka John the Baptist) coming out of an overshadowing cloud to spake with two Sons Jesus about his decease.


In Philippians 3:2 Paul & Timothy warn saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi to:
"Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision".

In Galatains 2:9 Paul The Apostle speaks of three who "seemed to be pillars":
"And when James, Cephas (Peter) and John who seemed to be pillars, perceived the
grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship;
that we [should go] unto the heathen (Gentiles), and they unto the circumcision (Jews)".

In Matthew  17; Mark 9; Luke 8; Luke 9: partiality status is given to three:
The three top dogs given partiality status are named as Peter James John;
And at the transfiguration it's notably the Son of Man, not the Son of God.
Even Herodians perceived: there is no respect of persons with Son of God.
In James 3's comparison of two wisdoms, pure wisdom is without partiality.
Partiality("respect of persons'), according to James 2:1 & 9, is a sin(law) thing.

Looking at the evidence we find the dogs Paul warns Philippians to beware are the three top dogs among the apostles: James, Peter(Cephas), and John. Paul even flat out names such as subverters who "bewitched" the churches of Galatia, noting they're "somewhat (I know not what)" who "seemed to be pillars". Yet none of this is said for accusation (John 5:45) or for condemnation (John 3:17) or even to make anyone right or wrong; But rather for the awareness of those easily beset, easily duped, easily bewitched, easily deceived, easily fooled. For if a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump, it's deadly dangerous to us all if any get duped.

It may come as a shock to many Christians, especially those who think John (Johnny Law) to be "the divine", to learn their idols, biblical heroes, faith heroes, were not as grace us as believed to be. Hence the forewarning to "believe [it] not": Matthew 24: 23,26; 1John 4:1; Rather to "know" the truth and be free of believe their lies(laws).

There's evidence in Acts and Galatians revealing James, Peter, John were not converted, but perverted dogs returned to their own vomit: law, as Peter notes in his second general epistle:

2Peter 2:22
But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb,
The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again;
and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

The (true) Proverb, concerning a dog, would be Proverbs 26:11
"As a dog returneth to his vomit, a fool returneth to his folly".
And the Proverb concerning washed, would be Proverbs 30:12.
"A generation pure in their own eyes, and is not washed from their filthiness".

  A fool, and even more the fool, as whatJC described in Matthew 23:
Fools (hypocrites, vipers, blind guides) all sat in Moses's Seat: Law

What happened to this James of this Peter James John combo?
Of three top dogs James was killed by Herod. It pleased the Jews (Acts 12:3), because James would not let the Jews be free of law. In fact James, along  with chief priests and elders of the church at Jerusalem, had converted Jews extradicted back to Jerusalem for punishment. And Paul, as Saul of Tarsus before his conversion, was very active in such extradictions and punishement. Yet when Paul gets converted and starts converting Jews to grace, John refers to him and others as no Jews, but the synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2:9). On the other hand Paul allegorically portrays John as a thorn in his flesh, and a messenger of Satan (Peter was called Satan, and John his popish bishop).

What happened to Peter(Cephas) of this Peter James John trio?
Because killing James pleased the Jews Herod also jailed Peter, the only man called "Satan" in the Bible; but after the allegoric 1,000 yrs [is] as one day (notably Easter) Peter broke jail, fled, went underground using his Jesus nick name Cephas, later surfaced in Italty as the first Pope of the RCC with John as bishop over churches of Asia. Peter eventually got converted, in accordance with the prophecy of JC: "when (not if) thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren". Such conversion (from law to grace) was notably later in Peter's life, and admittedly via reading all the Pauline Epistles (2Peter 3). We know such Pauline Epistles include Hebrews and Revelation since the conclusion of To The Hebrews notes Timothy (who got duped by them) is "set at liberty"; Also since Converted Peter allegorically refers to Revelation 20 in saying "AND a thousand years as one day", one day Peter(called Satan) jailed in Acts: Easter. So even he called Satan gets converted. Sadly modern popes don't seem to be aware of such, which is why a modern bishop says of pope: returning to the middle ages is intellectual suicide.

What happend to John of James Peter John trinity?
John never did get converted. John and James (sons of thunder) caused so much trouble among the apostles it moved the ten to "indignation". Worse yet, they wanted to be left/right law/law on high, which is as broadmindead and narrowminddead. Later John, who returned to Jerusalem oft, stirred up the Jews against Rome to the point over a million Jews were killed at the fall of Jerusalem and several million were taken captive, again. Based at Ephesus (where he is buried) John subverted the churches of Galatia and wrote to the churches of Asia, speaking against Paul, as noted in Revelation 2:9 ; Also in his 3John letter (killeth) to Gaius (notably one of the seven angels of the churches of Asia), saying Demetrius spoke the truth (3John 1:12) when he bad mouthed Paul in Acts. The idea (among Jews) that John was 'divine' came from John 21: 21-23; And The Revelation (Uncovering) of St John 'The Divine' is a Pauline written allegoric satire on Johnny Law, on John turning back to what was "behind" him, loudly calling;  is essentially a gotcha for being a thorn in Paul's side, subverting the churches he established.

Beware of Dogs (Dog is mirrorly reverse of God), beware of evil workers (law workers), beware of the concision (mutilation of the body) in Philippians 3:2 speaks of beware of them like James, Peter, John, dogs returned to their vomit: law. Evil workers are law workers, the concision being not only physical circumcision but good and better sacrifice, demadning people easily beset to be martyr-dumb (faithful unto death, allegory for faithful unto another law, is also a ministration of death). We know that evil is associated with law, for Luke, whose gospel account was for clarity, lumps "lawyers" (Luke 11:46,52) with the same "Woe" as unto Pharisees, scribes, fools, hypocrites, vipers, and blind guides in Matthew 23, who all sit in Moses' seat: judgment-all accusation-all condemnation-all law; which is what the true Son of God (higher than the heavens on high) would not do: John 3:17; John 5:45; John 8:11, etc.

Who let the Dogs out? ... Death by Denomination?
The modern song: Who let the dogs out, is a satire on those returned to their vomit: law in the age of grace; Who go about accusing others and excusing themselves via a perverted mixture of grace + law(added), which Jude 5 notes is as saved + destroyed after. They impute sin for the hell of it, not knowing "it is finished" makes sinners all, and the penalty for sin by law is the death of all are one, so far one proselyte: twofold: more the child of hell.

And again for Clarity about Three Top Dogs: Peter James John
What is said here is not for accusation nor for condemnation; But for awareness. Be aware is better than beware, which tends to fear; Whereas be aware grace glorifies perfect love void of fear. The only purpose in mentioning such is to help those easily beset get understanding, for understanding reigns in heaven that is higher than the  heavens (plural divided heavens on high).

 Home Page  - We are open to scrutiny: Email Us a comment on this page - Site Map