Holy Kiss: Greeting:
Grace
unto you, and peace,
from God
our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ
Philippians 3:2: Beware of Dogs: Three Top Dogs
Three Top Dogs to Beware
Beware Beware in Philippians 3:2
James
Peter John
It may come as a shock to
many who perceive James Peter John as pillars of the faith to find out
these three top dogs of the dirty dozen
were actually "subverting" souls, and not converting souls. For of
Judas
Iscariot it's thrice mentioned Judas also betrayed him, thereby noting
others betrayed him also. Peter denied him thrice, before
the cock crowed twice. James and John, sons of thunder, asked to sit on
his left hand and his right hand; Not knowing scape goats and dumb
sheep would be placed at his left and right, and both malefactors would
be crucified as thieves. So let's take a look at James Peter John to
see what it is about these three top dogs we should beware beware
beware: Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision
(Philippians 3:2).
There is no respect of persons with God & Son: Matthew 22:16
...Romans 2:11. No
partiality. Yet in four gospel accounts we find apostolic
partiality given twelve by two Sons Jesus, who also noted one of
the twelve is a devil: John 6:70. In John's account Jesus portrays
Judas, son of
Simon, as the one who is a devil: John 6:71 & 13:27; But the one
Jesus called "Satan" is Peter: Matthew 16:23. John's gospel account is
the only account that's "verily verily" of four gospel accounts. Such
can allegorically mean double minded: always unstable in James 1; An
account wherein John thrice portrays himself as the disciple Jesus
loved, but only according to John. Hence we find the Revelation
(Uncovering) of St John The Divine revealing when understood it's about
uncovering a saint named John (aka Johnny Law) whom many thought to be
"the divine". Perhaps those thinking Johnny law is divine should
consider law is the ministration of death, not the ministration of
life; And there is no respect of persons with law either. By law none
enter and all perish: Col 2:20-22.
Of twelve given partiality, we also find in Matthew 17, Mark 9,
Luke 8, and Luke 9 there were three top dogs given even more particular
partiality. James Peter John were the only three disciples allowed into
a ruler of the synagogue's house where the maid's spirit came again
to her. In the case of the maid, if her spirit were grace,
it would have never left nor forsaken her. James Peter John
were the only three taken to an high mountain apart where Jesus was
transfigured, notably after six days. In the case of transfigured
after six days, we find law giver Moses and Elias (aka John the
Baptist) coming out of an overshadowing cloud to spake with two Sons
Jesus about his decease.
In Philippians 3:2 Paul &
Timothy warn saints in Christ
Jesus at Philippi to:
"Beware of
dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the
concision".
In Galatains
2:9 Paul The Apostle speaks of three who "seemed to be pillars":
"And when
James,
Cephas (Peter) and
John who
seemed to be pillars, perceived the
grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right
hands of fellowship;
that we [should go] unto the heathen (Gentiles), and they unto the
circumcision (Jews)".
Looking at the evidence we find the dogs Paul warns
Philippians to beware are the three top dogs among the apostles: James,
Peter(Cephas), and John. Paul even flat out names such as subverters
who
"bewitched" the churches of Galatia, noting they're "somewhat (I know
not what)" who "seemed to be pillars". Yet none of this is
said for accusation (John 5:45) or for condemnation (John 3:17) or even
to make anyone right or wrong; But
rather for the awareness of those easily beset, easily duped,
easily bewitched, easily deceived, easily fooled. For if a little
leaven leaveneth the whole lump, it's deadly dangerous to us all if any
get duped.
It may come as a shock to many Christians, especially those who think
John (Johnny Law) to be "
the
divine", to learn their idols, biblical
heroes,
faith heroes,
were not as grace us as believed to be. Hence the forewarning to
"believe [it] not": Matthew 24: 23,26; 1John 4:1; Rather to "know" the
truth and be free of believe their lies(laws).
There's evidence in Acts
and Galatians revealing James, Peter, John were not converted, but
perverted dogs returned to their own vomit: law, as Peter notes in
his second general epistle:
2Peter 2:22
But it is happened unto
them according
to the true proverb,
The dog [is] turned to his
own vomit again;
and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
The (true) Proverb, concerning a
dog,
would be Proverbs 26:11
"As
a dog returneth to his vomit,
a fool returneth to his folly".
And the Proverb concerning
washed,
would be Proverbs 30:12.
"A generation pure in their own eyes, and
is not washed from their
filthiness".
A fool, and even
more
the fool, as whatJC described in
Matthew 23:
Fools
(hypocrites, vipers, blind guides) all sat in
Moses's Seat:
Law
What
happened to this James of this Peter James John combo?
Of three top dogs James was killed by Herod. It pleased the Jews (Acts
12:3), because James would not let the Jews be free of law. In fact
James, along with chief priests and elders of the church at
Jerusalem, had converted Jews extradicted back to Jerusalem for
punishment. And Paul, as Saul of Tarsus before his conversion, was very
active in such extradictions and punishement. Yet when Paul gets
converted and starts converting Jews to grace, John refers to him and
others as no Jews, but the synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2:9). On the
other hand Paul allegorically portrays John as a thorn in his flesh,
and a messenger of Satan (Peter was called Satan, and John his popish
bishop).
What
happened to Peter(Cephas) of this Peter James John trio?
Because killing James pleased the Jews Herod also jailed Peter, the
only man called "Satan" in the Bible; but after the allegoric 1,000 yrs
[is] as one day
(notably
Easter) Peter
broke jail, fled, went underground using his Jesus nick name Cephas,
later surfaced in Italty as the
first Pope of the RCC with John as bishop over churches of Asia. Peter
eventually got converted, in accordance with the prophecy of JC: "
when
(not if) thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren". Such conversion
(from law to grace) was notably later in Peter's life, and admittedly
via reading all the
Pauline Epistles
(2Peter 3).
We know such Pauline Epistles include
Hebrews and
Revelation since the conclusion of
To The Hebrews notes
Timothy (who got duped by them) is "set at liberty"; Also since
Converted Peter
allegorically
refers to
Revelation 20 in saying "AND a thousand years as
one day", one day Peter(called Satan) jailed in Acts:
Easter. So even
he called Satan gets converted. Sadly modern popes don't seem to be
aware of such, which is why a modern bishop says of pope: returning to
the middle ages is intellectual suicide.
What
happend to John of James Peter John trinity?
John never did get converted. John and James (sons of thunder) caused
so
much trouble among the apostles it moved the ten to
"indignation". Worse yet, they wanted to be left/right law/law on high,
which is as broadmindead and narrowminddead. Later John, who returned
to Jerusalem oft, stirred up
the Jews against Rome to the point over a million Jews were killed at
the fall of Jerusalem and several million were taken captive, again.
Based at Ephesus (where he is buried) John subverted the churches
of Galatia and wrote to
the
churches of Asia, speaking against Paul, as noted in
Revelation 2:9 ;
Also in his 3John letter (killeth) to Gaius (notably one of the
seven angels of the
churches of Asia), saying Demetrius spoke the truth (3John 1:12)
when
he bad mouthed Paul in Acts. The idea (among Jews) that John was
'divine'
came from John 21: 21-23; And
The Revelation
(Uncovering) of St John
'The Divine' is a
Pauline written
allegoric
satire on Johnny Law, on John
turning back to what was "behind" him, loudly calling; is
essentially a gotcha for being a thorn in Paul's side, subverting the
churches he established.
Beware of Dogs (Dog is mirrorly reverse of God), beware of evil workers
(law workers),
beware of the concision
(mutilation of the body) in Philippians 3:2 speaks of beware of them
like James,
Peter, John, dogs returned to their vomit: law. Evil workers are law
workers, the concision being not
only physical circumcision but good and better
sacrifice, demadning
people easily beset to be
martyr-dumb (faithful unto death, allegory for faithful unto
another
law, is also a
ministration
of death). We know that
evil is associated
with law, for Luke, whose gospel account was for clarity, lumps
"lawyers"
(Luke 11:46,52) with the same "Woe" as unto Pharisees, scribes, fools,
hypocrites, vipers, and blind guides in Matthew 23, who all sit in
Moses' seat:
judgment-all accusation-all condemnation-all
law; which is what the true
Son of God (higher than the heavens on high) would not do: John 3:17;
John 5:45; John 8:11, etc.
Who
let the Dogs out? ... Death by Denomination?
The modern song: Who let the dogs out, is a satire on those returned to
their vomit: law in the age of grace; Who go about accusing others and
excusing themselves
via a perverted mixture of grace + law(added), which Jude 5 notes is as
saved + destroyed after. They impute sin for the
hell of
it, not knowing "it is finished" makes sinners all, and the penalty for
sin by law is
the death of all are one, so far one proselyte: twofold: more the child
of hell.
And
again for Clarity about Three Top Dogs: Peter James John
What is said here is not for accusation nor for condemnation; But for
awareness.
Be aware is better than beware, which tends to fear; Whereas be aware
grace glorifies
perfect
love void of fear. The only purpose in mentioning such is to help
those easily beset get understanding, for
understanding reigns in
heaven that is
higher than
the heavens (plural divided heavens on
high).