Apokalupsis InSights
About
Revelation Final Exam
|
|
|
Apokalupsis Ioannou vs Apokalupsis Iesous ChristosIt's Two Revelations (Two Uncoverings): For Comparison:The Revelation of St John vs The Revelation of Jesus Christ. As if Servant vs Son: Law vs Grace: Final Exam of the Bible. Also as if a shewdown of John: his servant vs Paul: his angel. Law prophecies shall fail, when we let JC's grace prevail. Related Pages: Revelation Verse by Verse InSights About Revelation Seven Spirits Revelation Sevens Author of Revelation is Paul, not John |
|
InSights about
Revelation Page 2 contains these InSights:
#1 #2
#3 #4 #5
InSight about
Revelation #1: It's
the Final Exam of the Bible
many deceived by many fail by ass u me John
is AuthorInSight about Revelation #2: It's the least read and least understood book of the Bible: denoting massive ignorance InSight about Revelation #3: Title isn't The Revelation of Jesus Christ, but The Revelation of St John The Divine InSight about Revelation #4: It's Two Revelations (Uncoverings): Revelation of John vs Revelation of Jesus Christ InSight about Revelation #5: Only one of two Revelations is God given: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
|
InSight
About Revelation #1
Revelation is like the Final Exam of the Bible, with all preceeding books of the Bible being pre-requisite; a final exam many deceived by many fail by ass u me John is Author. Grace unto you, and
peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ Before getting into any discussion of
verses, or various translations, or even various titles of what's
commonly called
Revelation
(Apokalupsis, Apocalypse), let's realize both acceptance of and
placement of the book by canonization councils and
Bible
Translators have aptly canonized
it as the last of 66 books collectively known as the HOLY BIBLE, also
the seventh Bible
(KJV) containing Old and New Testaments. Such learned men knew it's
like the Final Exam of the Bible; As if an endurance test called
"holiness with sobriety", to see if we can navigate through the best of
spam without gettting spammed again, as churches of Galatia soon got
bewitched by johnny law brought them another gospel: another law: love
thy neighbor, sounded good, but it was law, not grace. So the purpose
of a final exam is to see if we've learned the difference between law vs grace, no
matter how it's allegorized. For there's no spam, spammers, nor spammed
in the Kingdom of God; And what's written in scriptures is written
aforetime "for our learning", as noted in Romans 15:4.
As the last book, Revelation not only concludes the Holy Bible, but the end to endure unto to be saved (only) concludes the Holy Bible differently than wise guy Solomon, who notes seven times law is all vanity and vexation of Spirit, but then concludes "fear God" as his conclusion of the whole matter in Ecclessiastes. Fear God (love) is an oxymoron, as God is perfect love (harmless), pure grace (merciful), and upbraideth not: neither bites anyone nor smites nations with a curse. Yet to get to the end we have to endure what's written to portray a black Sabbath made for man, who can have a last state worse if childish law isn't put away to be rid of sin and death followed by hell. Much like higher university courses require courses to be taken first as prerequisite, the 65 books canonized prior to Revelation are all prerequisite for the final exam; For therein previous books is information required to solve the mystery, in time, which many deceived by many fail to do. All who wade into Revelation without having the heart established with grace fail the final exam. It's not impossible to pass, just impossible with religious blinders on. It's cleverly written allegory, and written by Paul, thank God, for if law dog John had written it, it would end bad instead of grace us! So it's not only written as a final exam of the Bible, but as a satire on John turned to what was behind him, as a dog turned to his vomit, a washed sow to her mire, a fool to his folly: law. It's like all who tried to attain righteousness of law failed to attain it, as noted in Romans 9:31. The number of notable church leaders who've failed this open book Final Exam is shocking. I studied all their theories on Revleation for seven years, and found none of their partiality theories computed. So I finally went directly to the throne of grace, where only mercy is obtainable for all, and asked for "help" accordingly, as asking higher God "upbraideth not" for pure wisdom (James 1 - James 3). Then I got it, but prior to such I neither got help from the God on high, nor got Godly wisdom from men claiming to be of God. Of men claiming to be experts on Revelation (Apokalupsis) prophecies, I found Hal Lindsey (had studied Revelation prophecies for 25 years) and Jack Van Impe (had studied it for 50 years) to be the least accurate. They were as peddlars selling spiritual food poison, and driven to do such by Ghostly law, rather than being led of the Spirit to all grace and truth. As such they failed the final exam of the Bible at the first verse. That God is
an
allness: all light and no darkness at all: 1John 1:5,
all love and no fear at all: 1John 4, all grace
and
no law at all: 1Peter 5:10,
all
mercy and no sacrifice at all: Matthew 9:13;
Luke 6:36. Such needs
to be understood by all, for nothing less than that God's allness makes
us one, whole.
So it's needful for all to get it: understanding, and understand God
hath no respect of persons, none! And that God took no pleasure in
offerings or sacrifices which are by the law, none! For the immutable
will of God is "I
will have mercy, and not sacrifice"...no sacrifice,
none! The same will, only said differently, is given in
2Peter 3:9: "The
Lord is not willing that any should perish (none!),
but
that all should come to repentance". Why? Only all live (none perish)
is accounted
as salvation. The other
wise, which isn't an
option but an as if
scenario
is "as in Adam all die", which
is to say by the law all perish. But when we endure to the end written,
there is no mention of law there:
The grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ
with
you all. Amen.
|
|
InSight About Revelation #2
Revelation, being the least read and least understood book of the Bible, denotes massive ignorance among Bible scholars that's willing ignorance. The purpose of Revelation is (y(ou)r) awareness, not blame, nor shame. Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ There's much interest in this
book of prophecy called Revelation (Apokalupsis: Apocalypse), as
much as in another unsolved mystery: The Great
Pyramid, the seventh and only still standing
wonder of the "old" world. Both have many theories written
by many so called experts. Yet it seems a working knowledge of
either is
generally
beyond most people. Massive ignorance.
Sadly a working knowledge of Revelation is also beyond most religious and political ministers, even beyond most Bible scholars, even the twenty five year veterans in Bible teaching on National TV. Eg: when asked a reasonable question about Revelation prophecy, Kenneth Copeland said: "I don't know anything about Revelation except I get blessed by reading it, according to Revelation 1:3". My thought on such would be if ya get blessed by reading about brethren suffering and dying, then you're $ick. Jack of the Impe family of JVI, who already celebrated fifty years of deceiving and fleecing many North American sheep in the name of God and Son, and by saying just what JC said such like would say in Luke 21:8, is simply fear mongering and peddling: You must have this video, and here is another one you must have, always changing, but never ending. In my seven year study of Revelation prophecy (only 25 pages), I found nobody understood it. Those claiming to all disagreed, and no theories computed with the Scriptures, Gospels, and Epistles ... including mine; Until I finally asked God for wisdom according to James 1, and then got it: understanding. Perhaps our massive ignorance of Revelation is as great as Humpty Dumpty, which speaks of a great (law) fall, kinda like a broken egg can't be put together again, not even by all the law's horses and men, like the not escape sudden destruction of 1Thessalonians 5:3 for them who they say: "Peace & Safety" safety in law "worketh wrath"... Unless we all solve it and all escape destruction. For there is no respect of persons with God, so rapture theories of some saved is not acceptable to the only wise God, our Saviour, who will have all men saved and all aware what from: law, which is both good and evil, which is double-minded and ends badly, with tormenting evil concupiscence, and eventually death followed by hell. Yet men still desire rule of law. Massive ignorance. Your ignorance is your ignorance, as (y(ou)r) is a compound word that begins with you, ends with our (Eg: "our" Father, which art, in heaven; "our" Lord Jesus Christ). We all are one. The question is: one what, besides brethren all, if the majority are willingly ignorant to the point of massive ignorance; such that most people still get tempted, deceived, seduced, bewitched by another law, the second of Matthew 22:36-40 law law, namely love (law) thy neighbor. If such still the case, then we're all "one proselyte", twofold, "more the child of hell (law)" than those who made us such. So perhaps the real purpose of the revelation (apokalupsis: uncovering), written as a "worse" case scenario to avoid by put away childish law, is to increase "our" awareness, not blame nor shame. For the more we increase our awareness, the more we decrease our blame games, shame thereof. Perhaps since your begins with you, you all in the end also begins with you, and the Kingdom of God is within you, is why JC said God said: get the beam out of your eye "first", in order to see the kingdom of God is not right of left/right division, but higher of high/higher is harmless. So grow up higher than high by grow in grace; But not childish grace Noah found in eyes of the LORD (LAW) had partiality, rather the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ has no law, hence no partiality. Get the law out of your eye (the window to the soul) to see the "greater" of great/greater "is here", "is come", and by such greater light rules the day, by that light of this/that lights, we begin our see-king; And thereby help others, brethren all (Hebrews 2:11), to recover themselves (2Timothy 2:26), in time (Hebrews 4:16), lest all suffer and many perish due to such mass ignorance. Eg: Titanic men-tality went full steam ahead in a fog into an immovable object, due to a 'dead' line, and such an unsinkable fellow ship sank instead of arrive safely at the proposed destination. All aboard thought ignorance was bliss; And it was, until disaster struck. Result: all suffered, many perished. All who will live godly (childish)
in Christ Jesus shall
suffer: 2Timothy 3:12.
Why? Because Christ Jesus (mediation) is not Jesus Christ (grace and truth). JC grace is not partial, nor over against any, but above and beyond sides wars. If you don't know anything about Revelation, if you can't pass the Final Exam of the Bible, the Bible clarifies your ignorance is also your ignorance, since we all are one collective whole and "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump". We've been in a global law vs grace race since 1967, and a third day = last day = seventh day (Sabbath) shewdown for a decade already, since 2001. We are brethren all, all partakers of the "heavenly calling": Come, ye blessed; Not depart, ye cursed; And not both is an oxy-moron. Furthermore lay hold on eternal life we are "also" called unto is a higher calling than either of children vs children and servants vs servants calling us law cursed/blessed from left/right sides wars of Mt Sinai/Mt Sion on high. High things are what we're told mind not; And highminded is what we're told to be not x2. So come "now", let us "reason" together, not quarrel; Because quarelling is as strife, and in James 3 it says "where strife, there confusion and every evil thing". When we put away left/right division (law vs law and law vs grace sides wars) for what's high/higher, then it'll be as arriving instead of striving. For all who strived for righteousness (grace) by the law failed to attain it: Romans 9:31. So law abiding is futile folly. Massive ignorance. Ignorance is not bliss. It's now AD, not BC nor any BC & AD mixture, since time past and last days are accounted opposite: <--BC/AD-->, so a mixture would be an oxy-moron, and the mystery of God's will is already "made known" (Ephesians 1:9). So if any are still failing the Final Exam, then (you)r ignorance is indeed y(our) problem. We all sink or swim together. I say all swim by doing my part, which also includes insisting you do your part, so we all get it: understanding, which in Proverbs 4 is grace glory, the glory of God which isn't right of left/right sides wars, but is higher of high/higher. For our high priest went higher to become harmless, since it's not harmless on either of left/right sides wars, which have side effects to both sides, the most common being a body bag. Many ass-u-me, thereby making an ass out of u and me; And are often sow full of shit it's coming out their mouth, when blessed + cursed = accursed coming out the same mouth ought not so to be: James 3. Rather the cursed part, the curse "of the law", the law, even the assumed better sort of Romans 8 law law, oughta be flushed as "dung" to gain Christ (the end of the law): Philippians 3:8. If it's crap (dung: law), then flush it! Even the better law of Romans 8:2 law law is notably in "Christ Jesus", the reverse of "Jesus Christ"; Perhaps thereby it's also a faulty fault-finder, another childish blame game. Perhaps even better sacrifices are still martyr-dumb. Perhaps we should all be looking at what's best of three things: good better best, and best for all, not just better for some. Perhaps we should all let go of all sides war, for even winners of such wars never have true peace. Example: Israel won a Yom Kippur war, but still has no peace. Point: no Peace and safety in law. The grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|
|
Revelation
About Revelation 3
The title is not 'Revelation', but rather "The Revelation of St John The Divine"; So it's about Uncovering a Saint named John, thought Divine; Allegorically uncovering Law which many still think is The Divine.
Much like the first verse is actually the title in many
of Psalms (Eg: Psalms 64 title = To the chief Musician, A Psalm of
David), and
such is often erroneously omitted in our modern Bibles; the title of
what we commonly call 'Revelation' or 'The Apokalupsis': 'The
Apocalypse' is officially
"THE REVELATION of St. John The Divine"... which plainly suggests we
can expect THE UNCOVERING of a Saint, named John, to know
if he's The Divine sort of person, or not. For comparison, we
also have in the first verse: "The Revelation of Jesus Christ", who is
the divine sort and does have what it takes (grace and truth) to be The
Divine sort of person we should all be. So, when looking at the title
and first verse, it plainly suggests two revelations:
two
uncoverings, for comparing. But
we also have clarification only one of two revelations is God given, to
shew servants
(know not prophets) what's God given isn't johnny LAW<--Law, but JC Grace --> Truth.
The law and the prophets [were] until John (the Baptist, alias Elijah) but since that time the kingdom of God (grace and truth) is preached, and every child/man presseth into it: Luke 16:16 Revelation, by defenition, means uncovering, revealing, disclosure, discovery, etc. Such uncovering is also a Full Monty (Eg: nothing covered that shall not be revealed: Matthew 10:26; Luke 12:2); And not just the back side of the presumed divine one some saw in time past, nor just the top layer of cover up removed from presumed divine ones these last days. As much as talk of such may off-end law law folk, raise their religious hackles, we're not only talking butt naked, but frontal too, to see if a so-called sainted divine, by a popish Cephas, actually has what it takes to be "the" divine, or whether he's perhaps just a eunuch of law in bed with the harem of his lord. Or maybe he falls a little short of the all truth is no lie at all if he says, of himself, that he's more beloved than brethren, but such is only according to John, the only one of four gospels that's a "verily verily" account, which is a double-minded thing, when viewed from above a servant, which John notably still is in Revelation 1:1, in spite of being told in John 15:15 that a servant is a kNOW not. John 15:15 Henceforth
I call you not servants;
for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth So let's debunk those saying start your Bible reading with John, instead of at the beginning of sorrows (laws) also declares the end of such darkness (law) to endure unto to be saved (only), instead of saved and destroyed afterward like them saved out of Egypt by Moses' law was both good and evil. Eg: let there be light (grace), and there was light (understanding, enlightenment). For as Amos 5:18 notes the day of the LORD (LAW) is darkness (law) and not light (grace). Confusion and misunderstanding comes when some modern KJV Bibles actually state the title as 'THE REVELATION of Jesus Christ', which the book of Revelation also is (per Revelation 1:1), but such is only the after part of such a before/after shew and shewdown; And not the right of left/right, but the higher of high/higher. The Revelation of Jesus Christ is the verse after the title; Also given to denote The Uncovering of JC is also available (from Genesis to Jude, especially in the gospels and epistles; but not in Revelation until the end of the law); Also as a Full Monty for comparison. Such is the God given revelation, uncovering, and only for the God given purpose stated: to shew (by comparison) JC's got what it takes to tell the truth; For God cannot lie nor die, and neither can His Son: JC: the same yester day, to day, and for ever... always grace us, and mercy full, and peace full; never both nice and nasty as law is both good and evil. Yet such didn't happen with two Sons Jesus, not until he became one Son Christ, went higher to become harmless. Much confusion has resulted in not using the original title, which in the Greek text is Apokalupsis Ioannou, and simply means The Revelation of John, which also means The Uncovering of John, which also means there's been a cover up which is now being uncovered to disclose, reveal, make aware something about John previously unknown; Yet done in allegorical symbolism and as a satire about John by Paul, who names John in one of his epistles as one of three top dogs who bewitched the churches of Galatia, the one he refers to as a thorn in his flesh sent to buffet him, and whom he calls a somewhat, I know not what, refering to his gospel as another gospel (another law) which is actually no gospel (not good news) at all; Also noting whoever brings such blessed + cursed is himself accursed thereby inexcusable law also condemns the accuser. So if you've thought, as many do, John to be a saint that's divine, dare to compare him with one who is divine: Jesus Christ. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|