Revelation (about Revelation)
# 28
Son of Man -vs- Son of God
Numbers 23:19
The Son of Man is not the Son of God;
For "God is not a man that he should lie,
Neither Son of man that
he should repent".
Son of man
The term Son of man occurs aprox 109
times in the Bible, and carries with it no implication of divinity.
Rather the phrase is translated in the Hebrew as Ben Adam or in the
Aramaic as Bar Enash, which is also loosely translated in at least 12
instances as man in general, or humanity, the first Adamic sort of two Adams, the
created of created/made things,
them
of them/us (two alls),
the ye do errr of ye/you,
the imperfect of
imperfect/perfect parts, child of
child/man, servant
of servant/son, old of old/new, first of first/second, and of two sons of
Abraham the one to cast out (the script-u-are saith "cast out the
bondwoman and her son": Gal
4); allegorically speaking of law of law/grace and lie of lie/truth in
such things are an allegory.
So "like unto Son of man" in Revelation 1,2,3
speaks of being like unto
first Adam, or them (which is Adam in Gen 5:2), which is like unto a
vessel fit for destruction; for them of them/us is the counter part in
such a two part shew about a third part. And once the point of such is
understood, the counter part is to be done away; Not to mention God is
one, of us, with us, for us, and hath given us the victory
thru JC.
Son of man should repent: Numbers 23:19
When looking at the
Son of Man in the OT, especially in Ezekiel (the prophet Ezekiel is
addressed as "Son of man" aprox 94 times), we find such a man and his
God(law) are pretty
much against everyone. Daniel
is also referred to as Son of man (Daniel 8:15-17). When looking at the
Son of Man in the NT we
find such to be sin and iniquity
conscious, also vengeful to those who betrayed him, divisional, ransom
orientated, a sign unto a wicked generation, cloudy, to be lifted up as
a serpent, hath no where to lay his head(God), is judgmental to the
point of two resurrections of the dead unto life and damnation (Jn
5:27-29), decends and ascends to where he was before, at the right hand
of the power(gospel) of God(law), seen of Stephen standing on right
hand of God (as if Satan), sits on a cloud (confusion) with a sharp
sickle in his hand (word of God is "sharper"), and has a "two-edged
sword" (word
of God is "sharper" than any two-edged sword) coming out his mouth, promises 12 thrones
to 12 apostles to judge 12 tribes, etc.
When the Son of Man is
revealed, as a law avenger: Luke 17:30, Jude 1:15;
Then it's destruction
for them all:
Luke 17:29; 1Thessalonians 5:3; Jude 1:5
Son of God
The Son of God neither obeyed
nor disobeyed any law at all, nor imputed any sin, paid a visit not
a ransom, hath no
respect of persons (all same, since all one, but not them all of two
alls: "them all" and "us all"; so he is long-suffering to "us-ward"). That Jesus Christ is
come, but is not come
to condemn any (Jn 3:17), nor to accuse any (Jn 5:45), such that none
are lost by being sow condemned by law, which is a ministration of
condemnation. Out of his
mouth comes the word of God which is "sharper than any two-edged sword"
(Heb 4:12),
and by him is only resurrection to life. He is merciful not merciless,
ascends higher
than the heavens, and is entered therein to appear for us in the
presence of God.
Son of God vs Son of God: Christ of CJ vs
Christ of JC
Clarity: Jesus Christ (not Christ Jesus) is the
Son of God: Mark 1:1.
By JC came grace and truth (not law and lie of Moses: John 1:17)). He
was
not sent to condemn(law) the world (John 3:17; John 8:3-11), nor would
he accuse(law) any as
Moses did (John 5:45); No, not this; But rather "that": that "through" him: through
Jesus (born under law, of woman) -> Christ (the end of
the law)
-> God (all
grace), the world might be saved (graced) only; saved
from law: sin and death: such like: sin
imputation, accusation, condemnation, death, of law: the
ministration
of death.
For further clarity (as was the purpose
of the gospel according to
Luke: 1:1-3), it is "Christ" (of "Jesus -> Christ") who is the "Son
of
God": Luke 4:41, since "Jesus" (of "Jesus -> Christ" or of "Christ
-> Jesus") is also clarified as being
the tormentor(law) of such law -> grace: Luke 8:38. Such is
confirmed
oft, such as in John 11:27; 20:31; Acts 9:20; Galatians 2:20; Ephesians
4:13.
John the Baptist saw it backwards,
saying that this (instead of this
-> that) is the Son of God, noting such baptizes with the merciless
Holy Ghost
(rather than with the merciful Holy Spirit). John the Baptist did
accuse(law)
and condemn(law); And for such lawing he was beheaded; Allegoric for
the end of law: the age of grace.
John also
saw it backwards, portraying
Jesus (1John 5:5) and the
apparition like unto the Son of man as the Son of God (Revelation
2:18), from
whom is to come wrath & vengeance, not peace nor love. John notes a
Holy Ghost God
gave witness Jesus was the Son of God. But such does not
even agree with the gospel of John: 3:17; Which is the only "verily
verily" gospel account of four accounts.
We are the body of Christ, not the body of
Jesus
The "name" of the "only begotten" Son of
God is grace (Christ: the end of the law), not law
(Jesus: made under the law). He that believeth on him is not
condemened(lawed)... ye are not under the law(Jesus), but under
grace(Christ)... which
things are an "allegory",
and a "mystery" to solve in time, lest all perish by law(Jesus) instead
of none perish by grace (Christ). ES is through Jesus->Christ.
Son
of man vs Son of God
Son of
Man is always
associated with them,
division and destruction: 1Thessalonians 5:3; Whereas Son of God is
associated with us:
1Thess 5:9 whom
God hath not appointed unto wrath (law worketh wrath), nor
destruction which comes upon "them" who say Peace & Safety (Grace
& Law), safety in
law. Not!
The law (and lie) was given by Moses,
But grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
God is not a man that
he should lie. Lie = Law.
The Son of
man is not the Son of God; For God is not a man that he
should lie(law), nor the
Son of man that he should repent(change). Notably
God never changes:
I will "never leave thee nor forsake thee", nor does the Son of God:
Jesus Christ "the same"
yesterday, to day, and for ever. It is we all who must change, are
being chanGed (as from ye
to you in Jn
8:32), changed by the Spirit: 2Corinthians 3. It is we who must take
the grace walk, "from faith to
faith" and "from
glory
to glory", as if first from mtn to mtn,
then even "higher than the heavens";
for God & Son are both on Sion in two mtns of Hebrews 12.
But at Hebrews 12:1
the walk notably becomes an end "run" unto Hebrews 13:25, as if to
what's above a
servant, or unto a more
excellent way than either a broad way or a narrow way; as the
third of three.
"Lord Also" of the
Sabbath = One Lord too many
What's
interesting about "Son of man", is he's "Lord also of the Sabbath": Mk 2:28 (see also Mt 12:8; Lk 6:5), and Revelation takes place
on the Sabbath. However when looking at such
it seems to be a Sabbaths shewdown, also
a shewdown of Lords;
which is allegorically a final final examination and shewdown of law vs
grace. Notably it was the sabbath when Jesus made the clay (Jn 9:14).
The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath (Mark 2:27).
However this sabbath is not the eternal day of God,
but the annual day of
atonement, which
speaks of the "affliction
of souls", which
speaks of impure religion: law (not pure religion: grace), which speaks
of "the law worketh wrath", which speaks of
"destruction" (not salvation), which speaks
of "them" (not us).
To better understand the twain,
and the difference between "contrary things", consider the two
ends of the last millennium, where the first (Y2K) was the false,
fearful, and costly end; which coincidentally had a countdown of 3 1/2
yrs (42 mos) from Greenwich in June 1996 - December 1999. So mid trib rapture folk missed it, not to mention both the
pre trib and post trib
folk also missed it. And what followed was the real end. With all thy getting, get it: "understanding" = "grace glory" (Prov
4).
Lord Also? Son of Man is Lord also of the
Sabbath?
So Son of man is "Lord also of
the sabbath" (the black sabbath of twain sabbaths); But only until one
of twain
Lords is
decisively made the Lord
of Lords, and one of twain
Sabbaths is made the Sabbath, the day of God (not the day of the LORD).
|
