|
|
Free Monthly GodShew Epistle
Unto Subscribers
|
Epistle: Monthly GodShew Epistle Unto SubscribersJune Topic: The mingled drink Christ would not receive: grace + law. |
|
|
Free Monthly GodShew Epistle
Unto Subscribers
|
|
Holy
Kiss: Greeting:
Grace unto you, and
peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. GodShew monthly Epistle Topic for June 2011:The mingled drink that Christ would NOT receive:Grace + Law: Good + Evil: Friend + Enmity: Freedom + Bondage: Salvation + Destruction: With + Against:Truth + Lie: New + Old: Bless + Curse: Purged + Defiled: Sweet + Bitter: Mercy + Sacrifice: Life + Death; Because what grace + truth came to do will of God is I will have mercy (grace), and not sacrifice (law). The mystery of his will that's made known unto us, meaneth I will have grace (life), and not law (death); And DO thy will O God, in earth, as it is [done] in heaven, precedes receive the promise: eternal life. (Eternal life is not life after death, but life void of death, which is only plausible via grace void of law) All previous faith heroes had not done the will of God; So these all died and received not the promise. God hath provided some better thing for us makes Hebrews 11 a hall of shame, and not a hall of fame. Such blame game players applied salvation unto themselves, destruction to others, which is partiality; But a constant theme throughout Old/New Testaments is that there is no respect of persons with God. No Partiality: either all die (law) <--or--> all live (grace); So pick one only of these two options for the making of mankind: <--them|us-->: sudden destruction comes upon them<--|-->God hath not appointed us unto wrath as in Adam (them) all perish by law<--BC|AD-->in Christ (us) none perish by grace. Harmfull: By Law God, it was none righteous, so none enter, all perish: destruction<--themward. or Harmless: By Grace God, it is all righteous, so that all enter, none perish: salvation-->us-ward. Hence to lay hold on eternal life we're told to leave resurrection of the dead to go on unto perfection. For when perfected by that God: God of the living isn't God of the dead, there's no dead to resurrect. Such is to say, when we stop this duality of Heaven + Earth, then we will have Heaven void of Earth. (where & when no law, there and then no transgression, but where and when law, there & then flaw) Until then, not one jot or tiddle of deadly law will fail to keep all grounded, in jeopardy of groundead. For there is no respect of persons with God, and a little leaven leaveneth the whole (body of Christ). A little cancer us law can and will kill the whole body. So we should not receive mingled grace + law. Eg: if any man or angel bring you grace + law = blessed + cursed, let him (not you) be accursed by it. Matthew
27:33,34 (the mingled drink
allegory = vinegar + gall)
And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, that is to say, a place of a skull, They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted [thereof], he would not drink. Mark 15:22,23 (the mingled drink allegory =
wine + myrrh)
And they bring him unto the place Golgotha, which is, being interpreted, The place of a skull. And they gave him to drink wine mingled with myrrh: but he received [it] not. Sadly many so-called christians are not even aware Christ would not receive the mingled drink. So it is our epistle goal to bring awareness about the only true God of false/true Gods and his Christ. Worse yet, if discovered, and they ask their priests or pastors about it, they're told Jesus wanted to feel all the pain of being their replacement sacrifice for their sin; So Jesus would not drink a narcotic offered to numb the pain of his death on the cross. It's Horeb-Bull: commonly called BS. Sacrifice is what true God & Son will not have: I will have mercy, and not sacrifice; And the not part is not then, not now, not ever (Ps 40:6; 51:16; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13; 12:7; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:8). The will of God to be done in earth as it is
in heaven,
in order to receive
the promise:
"I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" = I will have grace (life), and not law (death). See no evil (law), Hear no evil (law),
Speak no evil (law);
So "touch not, taste not,
handle not" law; For
by the u-sing of laws all perish: Colossians 2:20-22, perish the
thought. See no evil (law), Hear no
evil (law), Speak no evil (law). All law is as dung, to be flushed (abolished
from the flesh, done away
as the put off to put away
to be-come man-kind). For no man is justified by the law: Galatians 3:11, and
sacrifice is by the law:
Hebrews 10:8. Therefore no man is justified by sacrifice (blood shed),
because it does not purge the conscience of sin: Hebrews 9. Law demands
perfection,
but can never make any perfect: Hebrews 10. So we find
grace + law heroes in a hall of shame,
not fame: Hebrews 11;
For a mingled drink is a blame game.
So we should also not receive the mingled
drink of grace + law = mercy + sacrifice = life + death. For God did
not send his Son to bring ww condemnation and death, but eternal life void of death. To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto
himself (that God cannot lie nor die), and notably by not law imputing
sin and death unto them for the hell of it: 2Corinthians 5:19.For if you see good + evil your own mouth will defile you: The mingled drink:
Proverbs 9:1-5
Wisdom hath builded her house,
she hath hewn out her seven pillars: She hath killed her beasts; she hath mingled her wine; she hath also
furnished her table. She hath
sent forth her maidens: she crieth upon the highest places of the city,
Whoso [is] simple, let him turn in hither:
[as for] him that wanteth
understanding, she saith to him, Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the
wine [which] I have mingled. James 3:10,11 (paraphrased)
Blessing (Grace) + Cursing (Law) out of the same mouth ought not so to be. Sweet (Mercy) + Bitter (Sacrifice) coming out of the same fountain is absurd. Pure wisdom from above (Grace unto you from God)
This wisdom descendeth not from above, but [is] earthly,
sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife [is],
there [is] confusion
and every evil
work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and]
easy to be intreated, full
of mercy and
[full of] good fruits, without partiality, and
without hypocrisy.
isn't earthly, sensual, devilish wisdom: James 3:15-17. Many are the biblical allegoric examples of
the mingled drink: grace +
law;
- In Genesis
2:16 + 17 it's every tree + not every tree; an
oxy-moron having a bad end: surely
die.which is the mingling of contrary things, which only makes an oxy-moron: It's talked about in Matthew 12: either make the tree fruit good (grace) or corrupt (law), not both. For the woman, being deceived, was in the transgression, by mingling grace + law is not of God. Hence the serpent asked the woman: hath God said Genesis 2:17? She said yes, both 2:16 + 17. The woman also said double-minded "Amen, amen" to being both blessed + cursed in Numbers 5. Such is followed by twelve Amens to being cursed in Deuteromony 27, notably by all the people. So we find Jesus calling his mother "woman" twice in "verily verily" John was not a compliment. It's talked about in Galatians 1: if any bring you this blessed + cursed gospel, let him be accursed. Paul The Apostle even names 3 top dogs who bewitched churches of Galatia with mingled drink. His gospel is not the gospel of Jesus. It's the gospel of God: grace and the gospel of Christ: peace. For 2 Sons Jesus, who did not bring peace, but a twoedged sword, did not give them rest (peace). In compare-i-son & contrast the sword of the Spirit: the word of God is sharper than grace + law. Such is to say when led of the Spirit we become smarter than getting seduced by a mingled drink. Such can't be said of purpose driven sheeple of purpose driven churches, who mingle grace + law; For their purpose is hell bent on having sacrifice (law: evil) by which no man can ever be justified. Eg: John-Paul II at Y2K: "the long tradition of sacrifice must continue in the third millennium": Wrong on both accounts: Sacrifice is what God will not have, and the third day is not millennial; And Dead Wrong (LAW<--Law): Not suffered to continue by reason of death: Hebrews 7:23; Yet for his contribution to continued sacrifice, sorrows thereof, the RCC beatified him in 2011. Eg: George W. Bush (Jr) at 9/11: "there will be sacrifice". He became worse than his father. One historian said: his presidency was the worst disaster to hit America, bringing it triple ruin. He not only started pre-emptive war, but did it with this: if you're not with us you're against us. - In Genesis 6-8 it's God + LORD; an oxy-moron having a bad end: Noah ends in a hall of shame. Such is talked about in Hebrews 11, notes such law hereos all died and received not the promise. Therefore we shouldn't have both that God = light only + the day of the LORD is darkness only. - In Exodus it's saved + destroyed after; an oxy-moron with a bad end: grace + law gets no enter. Such is talked about in Jude 1:5, prior to navigating through Revelation (best of spam) unto the end. Such is also talked about in Matthew 24:13 he that shall endure unto the end shall be saved (only). - In Numbers 5 it's double Amen, amen to being blessed + cursed, followed by 12 amens to cursed. It's talked about in Galatians 1: if any man or angel bring this gospel, let him be accursed by such. Point: grace + law = blessed + cursed = accursed; But Grace void of Law = approved unto God. - In Jeremiah 34:11 it's servants and handmaids allowed to go free + they return to bondage again. It's talked about in Galatians 4:9-11 notes plural days, months, times, years are weak & beggarly. - In Matthew 12:30-37 it basically says hey folks, it's not grace + law, but rather it's grace or law; And such is to say hey folks, it's not life + death, but rather it's life or death. So pick one only: either with (grace) or against (law); either gather (reconcile) or scatter (alienate); either forgiven (mercy) or unforgiven (sacrifice) either good tree fruit (peace) or corrupt tree fruit (warfare) either justified (grace) or condemned (law), by your own mouth, from your own heart Hint: God did NOT send his Son to condemn (law) the world: John 3:17 Hint: God's Son would NOT accuse: John 5:45, nor condemn: John 8:11 So Galatians 3:10 notes the evidence makes it evident is no man is justified by the law, and Hebrews 10:8 notes that both sacrifice and offering are notably done by the law. So those justified by sacrifice should re-think their salvation, and put away sacrifice (law). For the will of God to do in order to receive the promise is I will have mercy, not sacrifice. If Law: Do-teronomy + Don't-eronomy, it's both damned if you do and damned if you don't. - In John 5:29 it's two resurrections: resurrection of life + resurrection of damnation: grace + law. If both good + evil, resurrection of damnation (law: evil) continues damnation process of the good; So it becomes good + evil, a last state worse (more the child of hell) instead of a last state better. Such is like both life + death, which ends badly. Death is not a part of life, it's the absence of life. So don't believe those who say death is just a part of life we have to learn to accept. It's a lie. So having two resurrections is like having truth + lie, and a little lie lies the whole truth. If we take a glass full of pure water and add a pinch of dirt it becomes a mingled drink we ought not receive. For there are no dead to resurrect in the God of the living: Grace is not the God of the dead: Law. All too often we hear makers of lies in the churches saying you too can have partiality with impartial God by making Jesus your personal Saviour. It's BS. Jesus = salvation + destruction ends badly: forsaken. Furthermore there is no personal Saviour in global reconciliation; So this sort of personal Saviour men-tality ought to be addressed, dressed down for being a lie, and in the same manner Paul withstood Peter unto the face at Antioch for having dissimulation: Galatians 2:11-13. There is no respect of persons (partiality, dissimulation) with God. Dissembled is not of God. Assembled is of God. Law dissembles. Grace assembles. Law alienates. Grace reconciles. So a mingled drink of grace + law both reconciles + alienates, which is why James told scatter brain brethren not to have the faith (grace) of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons: James 2. Grace is not Law, so they ought not be mingled. Mercy is not Sacrifice, so they ought not be mingled. Peace is not Confusion, so they ought not be mingled. Good is not Evil, so they ought not be mingled. Life is not Death, so they ought not be mingled. Sweet is not Bitter, so they ought not be mingled. Above is not Beneath, so they ought not be mingled. Harmless is not Harmful, so they ought not be mingled. Unity is not Dissimulation, so they ought not be mingled. One of these contrary things just does not belong. Can you guess which one of twain to flush as dung, and do it before they sing their Revelation 15 song. STUDY 1: Law: all vanity and vexation of spirit. Eg: Ecclesiastes 12:12 (fatherly Solomon to a son) of making many books [there is] no end; and much STUDY is a weariness of the flesh STUDY 2: Grace: neither vain nor frustrating. Eg: 2Timothy 2:15 (fatherly Paul to a son) STUDY to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman having no need of (blame game) shame, by rightly (not wrongly) dividing the word of truth Hint1: Genesis 2: 16 + 17 is mingled grace + law resulting in transgression. Christ would not receive the mingled drink: Mt 27:34; Mk 15:23; Lk 13:1. For where no law, there [is] no transgression to even be in: Romans 4:15. Hint2: Genesis 1:6-8 is rightly dividing waters under/above, but Matthew 25:31-33 is wrongly dividing people left/right. If right of goats/sheep there's still under-taker jeopardy every hour, but if above of under/above it's harmless: no enemies, only friends. Hint3: It is a good thing that the heart be established WITH grace, not with meats that have not profited them who are UNDER grace. For Romans 2:11 notes there is no respect of persons WITH God; And Matthew 12:30 notes he that is not with me is AGAINST me. One of these twain swords is not like the other one. One of these contrary swords just does not belong. Can you guess which to keep, witch to flush as dung, and do it before they sing their Revelation 15 song? Sword 1: a sharp twoedged sword bites and smites Eg: Revelation 1:16; 2:12; 2:16; 6:4; 6:8; 13:10; 13:14; 19:15; 19:21 Sword 2: a sharper sword of the Spirit upbraideth not Eg: Micah 7:4; Ephesians 6:17; Hebrews 4:12; 13:4; 13:9; James 1:5
Hint1: Plural Psalms 149 notes a right handed
twoedged sword does two things:
it executes both: vengeance upon the heathen and punishments upon the people. It happens when high praises are sung to the LORD in the congregation of saints. Hint2: Matthew 10:34 notes 2 Sons Jesus did not come to bring peace, but rather he came to bring a "sword"; swordy "division" in Luke 12:51. Romans 16:17 notes mark and avoid them causing (swordy) divisions. 1Corinthians 14:33 notes God is not author of confusion, but of peace. Ephesians 2:15 notes Christ is our peace who abolished law was enmity. Hint3: There is neither peace nor safety in law worketh wrath, and they who say Peace and safety in law receive destruction, instead of receive the promise: eternal life by do the will of God. Eg: Japan recently got a big WAVE from law worketh wrath, came over the sea wall they built thinking it would keep them safe, but didn't, and it also began the sorrows of nuclear meltdown. Science gets a FAIL. ..............................................................................................................................................................
One of these twain religions is not like the other one. One of these contrary religions just does not belong. Can you guess which to keep, witch to flush as dung, and do it before they sing their Revelation 15 song? Religion 1: Vain Religion: all vanity and vexation of spirit Eg: James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion [is] vain. Religion 2: Pure Religion: has learned to bridle the tongue Eg: James 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, [and] to keep himself unspotted from the world. Hint1: James, Cephas (popish Peter), John seemed to be pillars, but are named by Paul in Galatians as three top dogs to beware. For when it comes to Pharisees like Paul, it's beware the leaven, but when it comes to dogs turn to their vomit, it's beware of dogs. Hint2: both old and new twelve were a hung jury and still a dirty dozen, because Judas "also" betrayed him, and Peter did it thrice, and even twice. James & John moved the ten to indignation, a consequence of contention. If "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump", all seven leavened in Acts 6:5. 1. Stephen... full of Holy Ghost martyr-dumb .............. first 2. Philip 3. Propchorus 4. Nicanor 5. Timon 6. Parmenas 7. Nicolas... a proselyte of Antioch1 ............................... last So let's not be fooled by him claiming to be the first and the last in Revelation 1. For the "operation of God" removeth all the cancer us law killeth, and in time. Hint3: Jesus was not (yet) perfected in Luke 13:32 while casting out devils and doing cures for two millennial days; But said go tell that fox I shall be perfected the third day. Well, it wasn't Easter, as even risen Jesus still upbraided. God upbraideth not. Perfected has no devils to cast out nor any ills to cure. It's now the third day. So it's now the time of the end, time to leave vain religion to go on to pure religion, and as Hebrews 12:1 notes it's not a walk about then, but a "run" when surrounded; Compassed about on both sides by cloudy witnesses who notably speak of "decease". ................................................................................................................................
One of these twain wisdoms
is not like the
other one.One of these contrary wisdoms just does not belong. Can you guess which to keep, witch to flush as dung, and do it before they sing their Revelation 15 song? Wisdom 1: Earthy sensual devilish wisdom Eg: James 3:15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but [is] earthly, sensual, devilish. Wisdom 2: First pure wisdom from above Eg: James 3:17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then 1 - peaceable, 2 - gentle, [and] 3 - easy to be intreated, 4 - full of mercy and ... midst 5 - (full of) good fruits, 6 - without partiality, and 7 - without hypocrisy (leaven). Hint 1: sweet + bitter feels like hell when swallowed, so both grace + law ought not so to be, neither spoke nor given amen, even if spoke by plural God and Sons. Hint2: Jesus sat down in an olivet grave yard to talk about the beginning of sorrows that would occur in diverse places, kinda like the wickedness that notably occurs in high places. Christ sitteth above such, so if risen with Christ think higher than the wickedness and the sorrows of laws that are earthy. Grace is not a grave subject like law was, and Eternal Life is not life after death, but life void of death (grace void of law). Only what's higher is harmless: has no jeopardy every hour. Hint 3: Spock quote from a star trek movie: 'logic is only the beginning (not the end) of wisdom'; So then beware of Gospelogic sites thinking them-selves the better wise, by still having better sacrifice, instead of mercy void of sacrifice. .....................................................................................................................
OK, I think I've made my point, that there are many twain things in the allegoric Bible mystery to sort out, and one of these twain things is not like the other one. Since contrary things cannot co-exist in peace, it reasons one of these things has to be flushed as dung (abolished from the flesh) to have peace (gain Christ), and not the sort of peace that passeth understanding, but the sort of peace that gets it: under-standing, and thereby stands firm in grace of law/grace until called higher, where there's no under-taker jeopardy every hour nor enemies to love, only friends know. So as John 15:15 says, servants know not what their schoolmaster doeth, so let's all be friends k-now. Friends, know there's also 2 sorts of Liberty from 2 snares of the devil; Because another law is as another snare of law many so-called Christians oft get snared by. For example churches of Galatia soon got removed from the grace of Christ. It was by another gospel (another law) they fell from grace to justified by Law2. Consequence of a humpty dumpty fall is: Christ is of no effect to you of ye/you. One of twain Liberties is not like the other one, so one liberty just does not belong. Liberty 1: first get it right of left/right in to get under-standing that stands firm. Liberty 2: get it above of under/above to be seated with grace, not under grace. Hint: he taketh away the under-standing liberty, that he may establish set at liberty. For even if right of law/grace on high there's still under-taker jeopardy every hour, because it's still division, not peace, still part-iality, not perfect-ion, still under grace. So the heart should be e-stablished with grace, ... Above (Plan A: Approved) not with meats did not profit them under grace. ... Beneath (Plan B: Bondage) New Web Page: Set at Liberty 2, from the
snare of the devil x2, as in Timothy x2
The "snare of the
devil" is a phrase used twice
by Paul unto Timothy in
a
father to a son
manner, since Timothy had become depressed (snared)
about churches of Galatia he was sent to bishop being Bewitched (by falling for plan B: Beneath: Bondage: Bewitched). So in his two epistles
unto Timothy, a fatherly Paul The Apostle
notes Timothy should firstly recover himself from the snare of the
devil
(eg: study to shew thyself Approved unto God by plan A: Above: Approved: Accepted) to be able to help those
who oppose themselves "recover themselves from the snare of the devil".It's notably study to shew thyself, not shew others.
Only when you're set at liberty can you help others. It's kinda like saying get the beam (law) out of your own eye first, to see better how to help others; Or kinda like saying first bind the strong man (strength of sin) to spoil the house of sin and death. For if the blind lead the blind, both fall in the ditch. It's preposterous order to teach first, learn after. So go ye and learn what Hosea 6:6 meaneth: Matthew 9:13. Then come and let us reason together. Genesis 1:6-8 Allegory of the firmament (Heaven) in the midst of above and beneath:
And God said, Let there be
a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the
waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which [were] under the firmament from the waters which [were] above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. Genesis 2:16 - every tree, freely given ... harmless grace: the waters above --- midst: firmament (Heaven) divides waters above from waters under --- Genesis 2:17 - not every tree, surely die ... harmful law: the waters under In the case of the Woman, being deceived, and thereby being in the transgression, such is explained in the web page called Transgression. For where no law, there no transgression. So then for the Woman to be in the transgression, there had to be a law given long before the ten commandments. John 1:17 tells "the law was given by Moses"; But ten commandments were not given by Moses, rather were "added" because of the transgresssion: Galatians 3:19. So the law "given by Moses" is Genesis 2:17, called "the law of commandments" which Christ abolished in Ephesians 2:15. For it's not of God, as only what's freely given us is given us of God. Only Genesis 2:16 is freely given: Genesis 2:16 - "freely" given us: "of God" ... Grace: Plan A: Above: the spirit of God Genesis 2:17 - surely die lie: not of God ... Law: Plan B: Beneath: the spirit of the world 1Corinthians 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. So in the case of the Woman and the serpent, the serpent asks the Woman: hath "God" said Genesis 2:17? For if "God" said both Gen 2:16 -vs- 2:17, which is every tree -vs- not every tree, it would make God an oxy-moron: the mingling of contrary things, which cannot co-exist in peace. Unfortunately the Woman replies yeah, God said both Genesis 2:16 + 2:17. But it was not God, it was LORD God (allegory: LAWED Grace). God "created heaven and earth": Genesis 1; But LORD God "made earth and heavens": Genesis 2. So it's not only plural "generations" of heavens and of earth, but also the reverse via LORD God (ADAM God, JEHOVAH God, LAWED Grace). New Testament: the "generation" of Jesus-->Christ (in whom all live): Matthew 1... After Old Testament: the plural "generations" of Adam (in whom all die): Genesis 5 ....... Before Plan A: Above, Approved, Accepted: Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ............. After Plan B: Beneath, Bondage, Bewitched: The law was given by Moses....................... Before Since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.......... After The law and the prophets [were] until John (the Baptist: aka the spirit of Elijah).......... Before Further on in Genesis 4 Adam is called the LORD, and further on in Genesis 6-8's flood story Noah is given plural and contrary commandments by both God and by the LORD: two -vs- sevens and two. Clever Noah notably did both: "all God commanded" and "all the LORD commanded"; But mingling such grace + law mingled by Noah got him both saved + destroyed afterward, also inducted into a hall of shame, not fame; For playing the blame game. "God" saw only "good" x7 in Genesis 1, not both good + evil; Only clean, not both clean + unclean; Only grace, not grace + law. For if we mingle the plural and contrary commandments of Genesis 2:16 -vs- 2:17 it's confusion, not peace. So Paul tells us God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace; Which is to allegory say God is not the author of Genesis 2:16 + 2:17, but only of Genesis 2:16. Genesis 2:16 - every tree, freely given: Grace ... Peace (via Grace only)... of God Genesis 2:17 - not every tree, surely die: Law ... Confusion (via Grace + Law)... not of God 1Corinthians 14:33 God is not [the author] of confusion (grace + law), but of peace (grace). In Acts 19:29 the whole city was full of confusion (grace + law). In James 3:16 we're told where envying and strife, there is confusion and every evil work. So envying is associated with confusion (grace + law), and strife is associated with evil (law) work. For law is both good + evil, as law both blesses + curses = accursed. So grace found in LAW (grace Noah found in the eyes of the LORD) is not the same sort of grace which came by Jesus Christ. There are two sorts of grace to sort out. Grace Noah found in the LAW had partiality to eight "souls", but God (Grace) has no partiality. Furthermore the word of God (Grace) divides asunder soul<-->spirit, as if dividing asunder Adam1<-->Adam2 in 1Corinthians 15, and also divides asunder joints(laws)<-->marrow(grace): Hebrews 4:12. So dividing asunder x2 is not only left<-->right to first be rightly spiritual afterward, but also beneath<-->above to rightly divide the word of truth in a manner it ends without shame after for playing a blame game. Such is only possible by leaving both law vs law and law vs grace sides wars for pure grace above neither makes sides to have war nor takes any side in a sides war. For even the grace of law vs grace is still division, not true peace, and still partiality, not perfection. Genesis 2:16 - above forgiving one another; no evil is thought to even forgive ... Grace Genesis 2:17 - endless forgiving required when both good and evil given place ... Law Conclusion: There's only flaws when there's laws. So Christ abolished the law of commandments in Genesis 2:17; And by abolishing this one lousy tree law (the surely die lie) Christ effectively abolished all law written in stone and in ink (the ministration of condemnation and death), because all other law (10 in stone, 613 in ink) was "added", and "because of the transgression". For the Woman, being deceived, was in the transgression (law); But where no law, there no transgression. Yet where law, there is never everlasting forgiveness nor true freedom from the snare of the devil. For law is both good and evil: ends bad, with evil concupiscence and surely die, if law given place. So Christ (of Jesus/Christ) is the end of the law, is the perfect prototype, perfect man, our peace. So it is written about "the perfect man": "the beginning/end of that child/man is division/peace"; And blessed the child/man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. Now
you kNOW the rest (peace) of the story.
There's only flaws when there are laws. Where no law, there no flaw. There's only germs when there are laws. Where no law, there no germ. There's only accidents when there's laws. Where no law, there no accident. Only when we put away law do we avoid being deceived, victimized, snared, abused, even killed. So to be liberated from the snare of the devil (law), flush all law as if dung, by abolishing one lousy tree law, the law of commandments, given by Moses. Eternal Grace has no
beginning, nor end,
neither beginning of sorrows nor end of life. .................................................................................... |
What does Epistle mean?
Definition of Epistle?
|
| Home Page - About Us - We're open to scrutiny: Email Us a comment on our epistle - Bibles - Sight Map |
