When it comes to study of the actual "Holy Bible containing Old and New Testaments" itself, of one Book (of books) having two testaments, even the mention therein of two Holies, yet is notably not called a Holy Holy Bible; And I speak of the Book (of books) which defines and explains itself quite adequately to the reader thereof if the student thereof is actually seeking God's holy truth (by being "led of the Spirit" instead of driven by the Ghost)... Then the truth which is come along with grace, and notably "came" (already) by Jesus Christ: John 1:17, is the sort of truth out which makes you free of "fear hath torment", via truth about the law which shall be ever more made known unto all, and as if "also that" shall be told wheresoever this is told, also that gospel (grace) shall be told wheresoever this gospel (law) of this/that gospels is preached throughout the whole world, even unto the full monty revelation (uncovering of what's covered up) promised us in Luke 12:


Perhaps what still needs to be made more known (something covered up needing to be revealed) is the Hebrews 12 "weight" to lose in order to do the end "run" along "with patience"; A weight which so easily besets many runners of the human race, is sacrifice, which is "of the law": Hebrews 10, which God and Son will not have: Matthew 9:13, not then, not now, not ever: Psalms 40:6; Psalms 51:16; Hosea 6:6; Hebrews 10: all. For the will of God, which the Son came to do (lo, I come to do thy will O God; thy will be done on earth), is notably: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice". Furthermore do the will of God precedes receive the promise; And those all, who did not do the will of God, received not the promise. So, perhaps the cover up first referred to in the childish blessed of the two child/man blesseds compared  in Psalms 32:1,2 (Romans 4:7,8) is sacrifice: shedding of blood, which does not totally purge the conscience of all sins, rather almost all: Heb 9, leaving even better sacrifice adherents short of purged. Perhaps sacrifice is the "stumlbing stone" laid in "Sion" (isn't Zion) which many childish-adults stumble over and fall, from grace to law. What then? Christ (the end of the law) is of "no effect" to you (of ye/you): Galatians 5:4

When it comes to that sort of study, uncovering what's been covered up, hidden, I've done more than most, including the likes of Billy (goat) Graham and JVI: Jack of the 'Impe' family. Having worn out more Bibles and versions (many perversions) thereof than a man can carry, and prior to age 50; My study preference of the Holy Bible containing Old & New Testaments is the Authorized KJV, which became the standardized KJV. But notably not the traditional 1611 perversions having the Roman Catholic Apocrypha nor the Protestant perversion lacking the Epistle Dedicatory; Rather the KJV which is neither Protestant nor Roman Catholic as told in the Epistle Dedicatory (perhaps why many Protestants and Roman Catholics war against the Authorized KJV).

I find the Holy Bible (Authorized KJV ... Standardized KJV) reliably accurate, especially when searching out the allegory clues required to solve the "mystery" of God. For of many versions I've studied, it is by far the most consistent when doing biblical searches and connecting biblical dots.


                      The Holy Bible is Seventh of Seven: A complete and perfect work
                      (notably not counting a 1385 Wycliffe Bible nor a 1582 Douay-Rheims Bible as good)
                      1. Tyndale's Bible ... 1525AD
                      2. Coverdale's Bible... 1535AD
                      3. Matthew's Bible (by Tyndale & John Rogers) ... 1537AD
                      4. Cramer's (Great Bible) printed by Whit church ... 1539AD
                      5. Geneva Bible... 1560AD Puritan flavored
                      6. Bishop's Bible... 1568AD Church of England flavored
                      7. Holy Bible (Authorized KJV) containing Old & New Testaments...1611 - 1789


King James' guidelines to Translators did not include mention of a 1385AD Wycliffe Bible (NT already translated into english), nor mention a Douay-Rheims 1582AD Bible (Latin Vulgate flavored) as good. Why is not such a great mystery, for the Epistle Dedicatory, Notes to Readers, and Guidelines For Translation suggest they were probably blame game flavored or contained dangerous helps. I would also note King James was catholic(universal), but neither Roman Catholic nor Protestant. Such is noted in the Translator's Epistle Dedicatory and Notes to Reader. I have  sampled and compared many versions, also studied enough about King James history, and Shakespearean history (he was contemporary with King James and Bible translators, and had the same royal favor as Bible Translators); Also studied past and present version debates, and information about Bible Translators: enough to feel safest of safe safer safest in using the Holy Bible (Authorized KJV with an Epistle Dedicatory but not the Apocrypha) for allegoric study to solve the mystery of God thereof.

As to the 1611 Authorized KJV, there were perhaps several KJVs printed around 1611 and afterward, just as there are many different KJVs still being printed today. For the mandate of Oxford University Press was to make money for the University printing things paid for by people. Hence any who paid for it got whatever version of the KJV they paid for, such as a Roman Catholic flavored 1611 KJV with the Apocrypha. A Protestant flavored KJV would likely not contain the Apocrypha. A neutral KJV might have the Apocrypha sandwiched between OT and NT as being neither, yet there for readers to compare with scriptures. As to the final authority on the matter, the Holy Bible says if any lack wisdom: "ask of God"; And more specifically ask the God who upbraids (laws) not: James 1:5. Furthermore ask in faith, and note the law is not of faith: James 1:6 (Galatians 3:11,12), and whatsoever is not of faith is sin: Romans 14:23. So then, if any lack wisdom, ask "the God of all grace" (no law at all), "that God", in order to get the truth having no lie at all. For God (Grace) cannot lie (law) is the main reason God (Grace) cannot die.


It should also be noted an Authorized KJV (Standardized KJV) has survived much false accusation of being erroneous or outdated by many (deceived by many shall come to deceive) for nearly 400 years, about the same length of time the allegoric works of Shakespeare have survived and are nearly as widely studied. It may interest some to note Shakespeare was contemporary with and given the same royal favor (grace) of King James as Bible Translators. When it comes to allegory, which Paul says the Bible is in both covenants, Shakespeare is considered one of the best. He was probably biblically astute. A Bible was found in the attic of Shakespeare's house.


I try not to offer dangerous helps. Rather I point all to the throne of grace, where only mercy is obtain-able and "help" is available, in time of need. The Holy Bible doesn't say ask men for wisdom, not even learned men, nor pastors and priests. Rather the Bible says "ask God" for wisdom, and more specifically the God who does not upbraid (law): James 1. The Bible is allegoric. Once a biblical fact gets established, Bible study becomes more interesting. Godshew.org offers revelatory topics and revelatory sermons to help you get understanding; But not in a manner of teaching or preaching, rather in a manner of sharing what I've learned, both from much study and from asking God for wisdom, nothing wavering, after much study became a weariness of the flesh.

   Plural "generations" of Adam (Genesis 5) are not the "generation" of Jesus Christ (Matthew 1);
   Also plural and contrary "scriptures" are not all "scripture" that's God inspired (2Timothy 3:16);
   Also plural sons of God are not the Son of God, and God did not send his Son to condemn (law).
   God did not send his Son until the "fulness of time" (the expiry date for law) expired: Galatians 4.
   God's Son neither obeyed nor disobeyed law, but gave it no place: was not, no, nor ever shall be.
   Law's a counter part in a shew, a contrary part to be done away when perfection (grace) comes;
   Just as childish things are put away when becoming man kind, the better of one man vs one man.
   For by Jesus there came not peace, but division; But Christ became our true peace is not divided.
   By Jesus it was them vs them; But in Christ it's all us-ward is neither of divisional them vs them.
   So eternal salvation and peace are "through Jesus-->Christ", and reconciliation is done "in Christ".
   For we are not called the body of two Sons Jesus; But rather we are called "the body of Christ".
   He became "us": holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, made higher than the heavens.
   Christ appeared to God in heaven (higher than the plural divided heavens), and notably for "us".
   Us is neither of them vs them; As All is neither many nor few; As grace is neither of law vs law.

As for Evangelists: perhaps "many" being evangelastic deceivers: many shall come... to deceive; Here's what fatherly Paul The Apostle said to sonly Timothy: "Evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry", also study (disapproved by law/approved by grace) to shew thyself approved (only) unto God, and then help those who oppose themselves to recover themselves from such law vs law is as loser vs loser: divided against itself. Such falls in line with first get the beam (law) out of your own eye to see better how to help (grace and truth) others; which also falls in line with "when (not if) thou art converted, then strengthen thy brethren" (notably told to "Peter" of Simon-->Peter, who is also called "Satan"). For true conversion is from law to grace (not from law to another law), and born again is of "incorruptible" grace (not corruptible seed: law), which Christ is, by becoming Christ is the end of the law: Romans 10:4 (not the mend of law: Luke 5:35-37); Since reconciliation to God (through J-->C, in C) does not law impute sin to them to confess or cover up, and if you're not reconciling (gathering), you're alienating (scattering): Matthew 12:30, which many do by law imputing sin and death to others, and thereby condemn (law: sin: death) themselves in the process: Romans 2:1, because law is "inexcusable": unpardonable (sin), both in this world and the to come. So if any of many (shall come to deceive: to law) say lo (law) here, or lo (law) there, concerning Christ (is the end of the law), then "believe [it] not" x2: Matthew 24: 23,26.

As for Biblical Scholars: some reveal major dah when it comes to the "better" Testament. I find most so-called Bible Scholars do not even get past the first verse of Revelation without failing the final exam of the Bible. What many teach and preach is what Paul The Apostle calls "dung", which he flushed to gain Christ (is the end of the law). As Bible Translators said: it's preposterous order to teach first and learn after, which many so-called Biblical Scholars still do (teach first, learn after).